pr1malr8ge

Well, this explanation is a bit more tuned. It makes perfect sense to me. I had thought about that after I posted my response before you replied back. None the less just saying it doesn't work because it's electric is what stuck me as odd and why I responded.

I'm not saying this isn't the case but I don't think because the AP is Electric has anything to do with it not being able to trim. If that were the case then the pilot also would not be able to "TRIM' the aircraft since the trim hat on the stick is just an electric link.

It does have memory but following me 180* it shouldn't do. Once in the merge the RWR should only display the contact infront for a few seconds the go silent it should not hook 180* while constantly beeping. Current 1.5 it does not give a launch warning nor show up on rwr

edit so video works for OP

by the way I'm not trying to tell you how to A2A RF but you shouldn't have AP on when Refueling mid air. Who knows maybe I'm wrong dunno.. but I'd think you wouldn't want it on.

maybe try a bit more dead zone but if that doesnt work then I have no clue. but don't forget you need deadzone for both pitch and roll, and make sure you don't have pitch and roll linked to any other device either.

I thought about that also the first few times it happened but when that friendly fire incident when we were flying against each other the other day this is when I put two and two together.. His spike on my rwr followed 180* around and I know for a fact he couldn't have turned fast enough. he was doing 400kts at the time we "merged"

I do believe Full AB should be 100% nozzle and rpm should also be at 96% there is a vmax switch in the bird that allows higher rpms but its not modeled in game.

it's possible you do not have a dead zone setup on your joystick. with that there is just enough input in the stick that the game thinks you're moving it and will not activate AP. I had the same issue as you back when the PFM was made with my warthog I think I added 5 points to the deadzone [from 0] and boom AP worked.

No they did not. I first thought this issue was the missile hooking but after playing the other day I'm pretty sure there is an issue with the RWR.. What i saw was when I was being locked up by a friendly [who either trying to piss me off or just was plain stupid.] and while he had me hard lock we flew right past each other with in 20 feet or so. anyway as we passed his rwr signature followed all the way around on the display and showed him behind me for a good 3-5 seconds still giving me the lock cue. Which is what I've noticed with amrams also. After I defeat a missile by kimatic and or notching its cue follows around the rwr and then continues behind me.

Sorry I searched before I posted but didn't catch your post.

Heres my Death by sam

While this possibly could be due to the mission I find it unlikly. In 1.5 when loading into an f15c Nav mode is stuck on ILSN mode only. When you first load in nav mode works for way points when you're killed crash etc. when you get back in to a new bird it's stuck in ILSN only and will not fix unless logging out and shutting down DCS then restarting DCS. Unfortunately I have not tried to go into single player or just reconnected to the server to see if it fixed the issue. I atm have only just stopped dcs and restarted it.

Nope no awesome sauce presented by you or your cronies. But you're the one whom asked for it in the first place and then asked again and looks like a thrice time. But There was more then just MX and fire dept stuff. I had my Personal aviation stuff. None the less Doesn't matter while you sit behind your computer screen bugg eyed looking to type about how much your DCS Su27 is the end all be all. I'm out doing things in the real world that are productive. Seems to me you might need a girlfriend or a boyfriend which ever you prefer I'm not judging. Nope no false pseudonyms or false names for me. I play/fly as my call sign on the forum reads PR1MAL or Pr1malr8ge either or. So No I have no EGO issues and could care less if someone is better then I am in a multiplayer computer game. Let's see here. I haven't lost an argument. You're just fooling your self if you think you've won any argument online. Nope not butthurt It's a computer environment and has no bearing on the rest of my life. You're the one asking for awesome sauce and when you get it your only recourse is to try and make fun of it.. I know what I've acomplished in my life I provided it as you requested multiple times and again now. You seem to have a desire to live through some one else's life which hey I guess if that makes you feel better I'm happy to send you more pictures of my good times racing/riding my MX bike, or flying real airplanes or risking my life doing fire department things. I think it's time you stop wasting your life behind a computer and go out and get a life mate what ever that might be either a boy or a girl. Nope my opinion is based on the community as a whole. Not based on a select few specialized events that only a minority actually play. So again you're deflecting. With that my opinion is not moot.

Umm Tumble, already been posted m8

Nope never said every F/F pilot does. How ever if you go into a vast majority of servers the majority rule of this is true. As far as generalizing you're trying to conclude that your select few that you know do this[use the sensors as they should] when a majority of those whom you do not know do not. Hell any person who games online could easily deduce that the majority of people who play online are out for their sole gratification on getting the most kills with the least amount of deaths and will do anything[not talking about cheating] to do it. Even if that is not how it should be done. You would have to be the most ignorant person in the world to believe that not to be true! Side stepping again. My observations are based on a majority. That does not say everyone does it. So with that KDR and EOS are a majority in use. Do not disagree with you on the last bit but it comes back to you're trying to select a few over the many to argue a point.

No you said CHEAP f15 pilots. not getting cheap kills against f15 pilots Yes I did but you're pinning that one statement as the end all be all and my only point on it being unrealistic. Yet I clearly stated other reasoning for this also. Again you just confirmed what I said all along. I've said multiple times already Multiplayer is not realistic as it's based solely on KDR and not a true common goal. With that tactics in MP are unrealistic but due to the way things are happening it's just the way it is. To add to this we are talking about Multiplayer side of DCS. Not talking about a single player doing a campaign. So no it is not crazy because I'm not comparing the game it self when playing a setup campaign and following it like it would be done in real life. Even then I am willing to bet a vast amount of players will still do unrealistic tactics to win in single player also!

I'm not angry you're just close minded. I'm willing to bet any kill an f15 gets against you with a missile you will consider it cheap. If you get guns killed that too is cheap because the f15c is to you unrealistic ability. Quit crying about how you're butt hurt over being killed by f15s The ET/eos is the same as the aim120c in terms of being "CHEAP" Get over it. The more and more you deflect and select small quotes out of an entirety of a conversation just proves you to be on a which hunt against anyone who supports the f15. No I did not say DCS is Unrealistic just because Flanker drivers use EOS. There is a magnitude of other reasons along side this. I also did not say there is anything wrong with the tactic of this either in terms of the make believe world of DCS Multiplayer! Seems you're just grasping at straws the same as Rage does. You're confusing a select few vs the community as a whole. So my opinion is based on the entirety of DCS as a whole and not your select few, so it is not skewed and most defiantly not moot.

Again you're going around avoiding the issue. As far as a chip on my shoulder nah man. You're statement says it. It reads that the majority of Flanker/Fulcrum pilots never use the EOS as a sole and primary sensor. Stop back peddling. Why are you bringing up Cheap f15 pilots. Seems you're the one with a chip on his shoulder. If you didn't you might have said new/inexperienced pilots of both US and Russian equipment. So please continue with that large chip Yes I did say that is unrealistic. Prove me otherwise that in any conflict using these planes that the flanker/fulcrum in real life would go hide in the mountains with eos only and act as an air defense or as air superiority. I'm pretty sure you cannot. Your idea of what is unrealistic is just that, your idea. What is better about this statement is that the true reality is that the f15c in game at the time we started this thread 1.2.xxx the flight model could not defend it self in the upper flight regime due to TRO so unrealistic inability would be more of a sound statement to say. But yeah your only valid argument might be the STR/ITR but it's not wildy off the charts and for the most part as MP as a whole not many STR/ITR issues occur where two players of equal skill in that arena face off. Keep in mind those who mostly complaining about turning probably don't have a clue. I suck [and I admit it] at BFM but I've seen all to many times pilots in flankers with full load outs and probably full fuel trying to start turning with me and pressing the S key etc etc and just get pummeled. I'm good enough to understand that I'm not going to think about turning unless I'm sub 50% fuel and 50%ALO otherwise I'm keeping my distance. You're being bigheaded bringing this into this statement. As we are not talking about one squadron. Nor do I care about your achievements. I've never argued the soundness of tactics in this sim pertaining to MP events as what works for one might not for others or what ever. I Stated the reason for why as a question was asked that the fights are in the dirt. You're the one with the chip on his shoulder and bring in your groups achievements as some smoke and mirrors to detract from what was said.

Santi, your tactics work and I'm not arguing them. Personally I think your guide is well made and pretty darn cool. The point of my statement was not to degrade nor argue your tactics. In this sim flying the flanker/fulcrum you have to adapt and your tactics are sound. Please do not think I'm putting them down. As I commented on some ones question as why the fights are in the weeds. I pointed out that the tactics employed in this sim eos is used as a primary sensor and I was argued/flamed for it. Unfortunately it has to be due to nature of the sims multiplayer enviromennt and lack of an overall community goal. It boils down to a single persons goal of kdr. So with that I commend you for your good work on your guide. Best of luck

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=150315 Please read page 4 paragraph 1 the last sentence page 4 paragraph 3 the last sentence on the page. page 20 paragraph 2 sentence 1 in backets. There's more into that guide that says the Radar is basically not to be used. In the above mentioned post you praised the OP about how good it is etc yet by your indication here you should be telling him it's wrong Flanker/drivers should not be flying that way. So with that please continue with your Hippocratic posts.

Ferry range of aircraft is not at mill power.. It's also at generally 32-36,000 ft. If you want to test long range cruise get the bird up to 32-36,000 ft and keep it just above "stall speed" and as low of AOA as possible in a clean configuration for the speed. This will give you max endurance. should be ~85%rpm or 55% throttle movement past idle.

I might want to add one thing.. You should remember that numbers are allways KEY.. Even the best of the best of the best cannot win when the numbers dictate it.. You need to understand when to press and when not.. If you press in a situation of 1 vs many you're probably going to die and there will still be one left.

ET should not give warning.. as it is not a radar guided missile.

umm nah m8 please don't bring that into this as you're completely misunderstanding what is being said.