Jump to content

ac5

Members
  • Posts

    1458
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by ac5

  1. Completely agree. I have tried a Samsung Odissey, and it was heavy, uncomfortable, far worse graphics. Maybe in 5 years.....
  2. Indeed.... I won’t buy anything from them until Normandy is fixed....
  3. Well, they should have fixed it BEFORE taking on themselves the endevour of making a new map...
  4. Agree completely with you. :thumbup:
  5. Excellent observation. :thumbup: You said it: Almost impossible to see.
  6. Well, I don't have a G-Sync monitor, but with the settings I have posted, everything flows like butter here. With the exception of Normandy, with any plane, of course. That map is completely and utterly busted.
  7. See my post here: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=242414&page=2
  8. You sait it, ridiculous indeed.....
  9. Nothing new... it's been literally YEARS and the replay function has never really worked properly....
  10. Excellent suggestions.
  11. A word from the devs about this matter would be greatly appreciated......
  12. I’m OK also with this.
  13. I agree! Excellent idea. There is a huge discrepancy between the excellent quality of the aircrafts themselves, and the world. ( e.g. overhauled illumination engine, to be able to fly at night properly, overhauled weather system, a proper ATC).
  14. :thumbup: COMPLETELY AGREE. ED should concentrate on "World" rather then new modules, as Posted by Frag. I would agree to pay for it.
  15. The stutters are caused by the rapid fluctuation in fps. It is much smoother a solid, fix 60 FPS, wich matches the refresh rate of my monitor, 60 hz, than a higher frame rate fluctuating every second or less from 80 to 100.... Settings included. I get perfectly fluid experience with this in Caucasus, Nevada and PG, excepting the disastrous Normandy, wich is very poorly programmed, as show many threads in this forum.
  16. 1903 here. No problems at all.
  17. IT IS still necessary... Thanks again.
  18. Thanks again! Now I can read the FPS!
  19. THANKS! I will give it a try.
  20. Indeed! Why ON EARTH this weird choice?????
  21. I am beginning to understand why the Normandy map is so bad, especially compared with Caucasus and Nevada....
  22. Excellent question! why the push back now?
  23. Completely agree! :thumbup:
  24. Here, this very kind sir has provided, many thanks to him: Gulf: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php...91&postcount=1 Cauc and NTTR https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.c...se_id=18561956
×
×
  • Create New...