ac5

With a loadout of two RB-04E Anti-Ship Missile and two ARAK M/70B ROCKETS dispenser one is supposed for BOTH weapons to Set Weapon selector to ATTACK Well, when firing the two (or one) RB-04E Anti-Ship Missiles, then also two ARAK M/70B ROCKETS fire, even if one does not want them to, what am I doing wrong?

Or simply not allow incompatible loadouts in the editor. If you attempt to mix weapons that are incompatible in the Mirage, for example, a black square will appear. And by the way, same bug here: Loadout: ONLY AkAN Gun pod and RB-24J Air-to-Air Missile, Before or after RB-24J release no sound from the AkAN Gun pod.

My Viggen EP-13 is far sharper than the maverick (AGM 65D) display on the A-10C, at which resolution do you sim? Never had a RB-75 exploding in the air. I agree on this : "In the A-10 I can't lock on Strelas less than half a mile in front of me". Anyhow, as I said, one of both is wrong. Fact is that the A-10C displays were better in 1.2, can't remember the locking.

Whatever... Important is that ED and LdN are aware (Are they?) of this discrepancies I pointed out....

Chizh? Advanced physical one ?

Understood.

Never.... The A-10 C is the main plane in DCS for me..... Only the TGP and the Maverick displays should be go back to 1.2 quality levels.

Hi all, thank you for your comments. mattebubben, you comment mainly about AGM's A's and B's, though I used for that mission AGM's D which I find lock better and from a further range. Ramsay, indeed, since 1.2 the image on both the A-10C TGP AND maverick has worsen, as one can confirm by the many threads / posts about this matter in this forum. Though I don't wish to mod them, it suffice that ED is aware of that (is it)? and hopefully this will be corrected in a near future... 2.5?

The Viggen’s RB-75’s (all variants) seem to lock to the targets from further away and more easily than the AGM-65’s (all variants) of the A-10C, regardless if the TGP is used to target and then the maverick slaved to it or not. Moreover, the image from the Viggen’s RB-75’s head in the cockpit is far clearer and sharper. Either is the Viggen too “easy” or the A-10 too “hard” or are the suedes better at it or I am doing something wrong here? :cry: Missions included, (identical, only the plane changes). RBSandAGMS.zip

Already! Comprehensive but simple, as always, excellent work. Thank you very much INDEED !

I completely agree. This is getting pointless.. I'm with you kaboki and I don't consider I have a low end rig. Bye, I'm out of here.

So the mig 21 is also more complex than the Viggen, you say?

Well, thank you for the blessings, and by no means this fact takes away the beauty of the MIG 21 all the way in the top of the DCS modules.... Get those additional 8 gigs of RAM, nowadays is not so expensive any more.

Not only for you. And it is not only FPS. The Mig 21 is quite heavier performance wise than all the other modules, period. And it is difficult to understand why, as other modules are more complex, e.g. A-10 C

kaboki, RAM is definitely going to improve your situation, but not going to solve the issues of the MIG 21 which I posted before. (I have 32 gigs)....

I think kaboki is quite right... Even with my system (see specs below) the Mig 21, although a gorgeous module, is far far "heavier" than all the other DCS planes. Just pay attention on how long it takes to load into ram, compared to the other planes. Moreover, at least here, it causes the problems I have posted in my thread: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=165729 And "loading" pauses of 2-3 sec. are more often than other planes. With the Viggen I have not encountered this issues.

Yes PLEASE, and T H A N K S!

PSD I meant...

That's great! But how do you do that without a PDS layered template / paintkit?

Thanks!!!

Nothing is too complex for the mighty Chuck, right?:thumbup:

If you find that sad, then you find sad also all the takeoff assistances of the WW2 planes, (which by the way I set to 0), and the nosewheel behaviour of the sabre? A bit of flexibility, maybe a clever engineer came up with a solution to carry several different AtG weapons on the Viggen in 2017.... By the way, as the A-10 and the Mirage, and the Su-2, and and... can do.....

I don't see any difference alt-enter or not, settings:full screen. ?

Where? I did not see it....

If one loads BK-90’s in the OUTER pylons, everything works perfectly, BOTH BK 90’s can be released, regardless of the position of the Release mode selector: IMPULS (Single) or SERIE (Series), OR the Targeting mode selector / preparation. If one loads BK-90’s in the INNER pylons, ONLY THE LEFT NK 90 can be released, regardless of the position of the Release mode selector: IMPULS (Single) or SERIE (Series), OR the Targeting mode selector / preparation. There is no way to launch the RIGHT BK 90, other than jettison it. Maybe I’m doing something wrong, though I don’t think so. Mission and pictures included.