Mainstay

O I almost forgot about this… nostalgic

Was wondering the same. Seems like a missile thats actually useful ingame. AGM-45A Engagement envelope Propulsion Single stage solid fuel rocket motor Engine model Rocketdyne Mk 38 Speed Mach 2 Range 12 km Up to 16 km from high altitude AGM-45B Engagement envelope Propulsion Single stage solid fuel rocket motor Engine model Hercules Mk 58 dual-thrust rocket motor Speed Mach 2 Range 40 km The difference between 12 km and 40 is huge besides the ugraded warheads

What time frame are we looking at for developing this air frame ED?

@NineLine lawl this is gonna be a hell of a forum signature after this one! “Zombie survivor of the ED/RAZBAM apocalypse”

No it didn’t. Nothing wrong with people being honest and sharing their thoughts. I would even go so far that if we don’t do these threads we do not stimulate the creators to do better. Personally i will buy it when the sound and textures get improved. It’s to everyone own choice if the product meets the standard and the price your personally willing to spend on.

Hi, Is polychop planning on a modelupdate? I see there is a partnership for the audio and your redoing the tutorials with voiceovers. Are you planning the same for the 3D model / textures?

I really love this era of planes myself. Wish we had more RED planes in DCS fullsim like the Su-24 Fencer and the Su-25 Frogfoot.

We should ask ED for badges O hell yeah! forgot about that music man that's awesome to hear again

Yes you are right but you know what i mean. The products that gave birth to all of this I remember i bought Blackshark online the russian version first. No idea because i cant read russian so had to figure it all out by just clicking menu items.... Then i bought it again when the english version came out. The good old days Nostalgic menu

I myself started back in the days of the 90's. Still have all these boxes and CD's / DVD's in a box somewhere. Blackshark was the first digital download for me.

Nothing hostile about it, depends on the reader how to interpreter what i wrote. I said what i said and even credit them so... Your last sentence says more about you then me i guess. Have a nice day sir

I'm sorry but i have to disagree. Good for the ones not caring what it looks like.... i mean if you wanna fly a carton box with rotors on top to keep the poly count low to get better FPS be my guest. But i want the best of both worlds and demand nothing less for myself. Have you looked at the F-4 Phantom from within the pit and external? Man that sort of passion in developing gives me goosebumps! That's what i want as a customer. I'm spending a fortune on hardware because i want the quality that most can offer and that's fine because its my passion as well. In all honesty i cant judge on the flight model and systems implemented since i don't have the module. And as far as i can see people are pretty positive and happy about it, kudos and good job to Polychop for the hard work and dedication in this department. But that doesn't mean that we cant give feedback or base our choices on buying a module because A: The price is really high compared to other modules and B: The external module (graphics and damage) model are far behind other developers. Anyways i hope Polychop can bring this beautiful helicopter to the same standard as other modules in the eye-candy department and then they will have another customer to their list.

No its not.... if beauty aint your thing go ahead and fly the thing. But personally i demand topnotch textures for a topnotch dollar price. Im done with halfbaked modules.....

Okay thnx for the headsup. I want the full package so ill skip this one.

Are these textures real? If so then im flabbergasted..... im a sucker for eyecandy and this is a big no no for me.

I just asked for a refund on the F-15E to my DCS account. Getting a bit irritated and tired of this situation by being left in the dark. If this takes a few months longer im actually gonna ask for a refund on all RAZBAM products.

@Holger Sandmann Yes? No? Maybe?

With all respect @NineLine and all involved, i have to say an official word towards the community that put a lot of money in your (ED) and your 3d party official products (RAZBAM) would be respectful. Weeks have passed and its just not fair to leave your audience in the dark for so long.

Looking at the table @Northstar98 made (thank you!) A loadout for true SEAD in a large frequency environment SA-- would consist a loadout as follows; 4xAGM-45 Missile 1 : MK24 Guidance unit Missile 2 : MK36 Guidance unit Missile 3 : MK37 Guidance unit Missile 4 : MK50 Guidance unit If i read everything correct this would provide me the widest spectrum to be able to engage SAM threats

Same problem here with a WinWing Orion Base 2 in combination with F-16 Stick. Trim button clicks ever so short cause massive input ingame. Doesnt really feel correct and glad a F-4 driver confirms its a bit overdone.

Can confirm this bug. Same here.

Can you guys @IronMike put the SA names in the menu ingame?

Pimax Crystal user here. F4 i see a cutoff and the F14 doesnt have the problem at all.

Sometimes your going through your preflight checklist.. your rolling on the concrete towards runway xx. Your anxious and hoping mission planning is gonna work out like planned. Don’t wanna disappoint flightlead and the squadron. One rolls out… two rolls out… your up next. Lining up, brakes on and throttle to mil power. Looking at the gauges you see a drop in engine two rpm… you tick the gauge with your flight gloves. Then you realize that this engine ain’t gonna happen. Your out! Sorry flight.. Sometimes it ain’t works as planned guys and girls. That doesn’t mean the person behind the engine, the pilot, the wso or anyone involved didn’t do their upmost best to get the show on the road!