Mainstay

To be honest I would rather see the A-6 Intruder before the Eurofighter…

Yeah and @BIGNEWY and @NineLine while your at it please consider responding to this as well Quote @NineLine "Posted November 20, 2023 Dear all, a follow-up to the above response. The 3D models are not broken and released as intended. The different quality levels advertised in the DCS newsletter will be presented as a part of the new ED product. Please wait for the news to follow." So whats the deal here? Any news on this?

You know what he means. F-4, F-14, F-16, Apache etc etc... the whole bunch are better in the visual department. Also your point and preference is clear. You want systems and physics and you dont care about looks, graphical beauty et cetera we get it. But whats unacceptable for me is that, like Thor said earlier the person that does the graphics, textures and those sort of things is a different person. And right now the "Base" level of aesthetics are not being reached compared to other products with the KIOWA. I for one, dont understand why poly doesnt say "okay we get the point we will hire another dude and improve" this simple reaction would bring them A more customers and B they focus on the whole range of the product (physics, systems, flightmodel, graphics etc). But the reaction showed earlier on discord by one of the team really set me off, i hope they will reconsider within the team.

Thnx for the info @Eagle Dynamics are you guys planning on doing the B version specifications changes?

Any word or thoughts on the B from HB?

Call us moaners or other things that make us look bad. I truly dont care because your not my friend nor will you ever be and the one im focused one is a comnpany because if they improve i will spend money on the product. English is not my first language so im not gonna start a discussion if its wrong or right to vent you frustration which basically comes from caring to see product improvement. Crusaders, moaners, whiners give it a name... i call it feedback.

O wow...... the arrogance Whatever happened to customer is king? I am sorry but if this is a structural part of entitlement within their business model i think polychop is done in the near future. I didnt buy their product by choice (I learned my lesson with the Gazelle) before getting a good picture, and voila! Says a lot that people that did buy your product are already shifting to "not gonna spend my money on the next one", why this way of reacting? @Kinkkujuustovoileipä Looks like you guys have some stuff to talk about internally.... Come on guys get back on track and make this work.

I’m personally done with this ka-50 series. I would like to see the ka-52.

If it’s good enough for you then congrats. For a lot of customers a sub par job of a so called “completed” module is just a big no no. Didn’t even know they reacted “we fly from inside the cockpit”…. Even more reason not to spend my money on them. A well.. their loss.

Only one that can clear this up is ED.... So whats the situation?

I just wanna see this MiG brought to 2.0 and completely redone from scratch.. If they cant do it please let us know then i can uninstall. Maybe merge with another 3rd party dev team?

Nope.. but some pictures of the 3D laser scanning and photogrammetry process would be nice.

So any news on this? we are nearing the end of august...

I havent forgot the B-1B Lancer situation from last year. Quote @NineLine "Posted November 20, 2023 Dear all, a follow-up to the above response. The 3D models are not broken and released as intended. The different quality levels advertised in the DCS newsletter will be presented as a part of the new ED product. Please wait for the news to follow." So whats the deal here? Any news on this?

Well still on the wishlist for me, but not in its current state. Modelwise is far behind other newly released products. F-4, Chinook for example… I hope they are working on a 2.0 version when it comes to the interior and exterior. Please make it happen

I don't know what your hardware is or if your running quadviews. But for me the FPS is really good and i love the amount of detail. Also have 0 problems loading in compared to other modules, i had loading in problems a month ago for a long period and couldn't figure out what was going on. I decided since i had the install for years and it kept updating each time with new versions without ever doing a fresh install to do a fresh install. Loading in problems gone for me and game loads fast.

I doubt it. I would love to hear why the western side gets all the attention (military contracts?) but redfor is lacking. I know MiG and Sukhoi are not cooperating. But that still doesn’t mean they can’t implement western upgrades. Look at the nav system… we all know it’s Garmin but it doesn’t say Garmin. But functional wise they made it possible. Why can’t ED integrate systems that are not 1-1 copies but mimic a lot of features. We all know military is secrecy but it’s not impossible.

I stopped playing the F4 because like most people said at this time Jester is just not fun to fly with. Many times I entered scenarios where I know where the enemy planes are but Jester simply can’t see / lock / find them. And then bam we are dead. I hope he gets a lot of improvement in the future. Love the plane and everything about it except Jackster at the moment.

Any word on the model? Are you gonna improve it? @RealDCSpilot showed you guys a lot that can be improved.

They are always involved one way or another I feel you. I’m just asking for an upgrade package that can be chosen like the Garmin kit we have now on some planes and jets.

Looks slick and very interesting. https://www.davis-eng.com/Mi24a.html

And that’s the exact reason ED should make an MiG-23MLD as well

+100

@Eagle Dynamics so you make the radardome part of the rearm refuel window for the Apache. Why isn’t the IR surpressors added yet for the Hind in the rearm refuel window?