D4n

Please add this bug to the list: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=282285

Since only a few weeks, the maximum 3rd-person zoom was decreased on a few vehicles like Tor SAM, Shilka and Tunguska so that the rear part of those vehicles is below the screen/outside the viewport. 3rd-person zoom on all tested american vehicles is still fine. see this trackfile: https://ufile.io/8lxnaxcl

Strange move by ED to disable this ability with one of the last OpenBeta patches and not mentioning it in the changelog. Or was it mentioned in the patcher-changelog?

Doesn't matter anymore, we figured it was overheating of engine component. (file was available for 4 weeks...)

Should say "if you want to use or see the supercarrier in all its glory you need to own it, it is that simple." so not only usage, but also appearance is affected. @Vanguard, yes, strongly agree with your opinion.

Ok, finally got clarified, ED changed their mind and deck crew will only be visible to module owners it seems, so now no confusion anymore for all the new DCS players. :)

who "he" ?

so "it seems it is not equal" ? How is that statement even related to my question??

any news, 3 weeks later? Did ED make up their mind?

So do both ED and DEKA have to work on this? Deka also wrote they have to make new FM and claimed that that will fix it... o_O

isn't external model awesome enough by now?

" != " ?

Wow, and I believed it was intended because that angle gives that 25mm gatling a super dogfight-capability xD

Want a temporary forum timeout, Zhen?? Because ED obviously wouldn't have added Silkworm to the game if it would be totally useless.......

We're STILL waiting, ED..... and still crashing our F-16s because of this unrealistic behaviour...

Still not fixed

see trackfile, 4 out of 4 Silkworm get taken out https://ufile.io/g68o45eh (even at "average" ship-skill, same result) Important for PvP servers with player-deployable Silkworms is that the Silkworm actually can hit a ship (even if that would mean that only 75% of the Silkworm missiles reach their target.)

Still bugged

which I'd interpret as "SAM operator can launch at targets flying up to 6000m", and NOT as "missile self destructs as soon as it reaches 600000 cm altitude no matter missile trajectory" for example...

You use controllers+Warthog+MFG crosswinds for flying in DCS?

The self-destruct currently seems very unlogical, in this example, as the target climbs through 6000 meters (long after missile fired), missile self-destructs although it can easily reach the target, still going 2600 km/h and within 2 km of the slow-moving target... https://ufile.io/iqs8l1z3

Why's the line-87 bug (gun depression) set to "acknowledged" but not "fixed", although it's in "resolved bugs" subforum? o_O (nobody acknowledged it in that thread from what I saw) https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=220178

batteries for what??

and exactly that's what my entire point is... currently, too simple, with this unlogical SD.

Ok here another trackfile, Dagger and ED, of very very unlogical self-destruct, as target climbs through 6000 meters (long after missile fired), missile self-destructs although it can easily reach the target, still going 2600 km/h and within 2 km of the target... https://ufile.io/iqs8l1z3