Rammit

Iirc they are activated by a butterfly valve linked to the nozzle lever, the more nozzle deflection the more air flowing to the reaction jets

While the RWR display can only be shown on one of the displays, will the RWR audible indications still sound regardless if the display is shown or not?

Pray 4 Harrier :cry:

I'm inclined to agree, whether it is something wrong with the modelling, or just FOV or focal points, the cockpit seems too wide in some way

We all want the best, sometimes devs get stuff wrong, sometimes the community gets stuff wrong. Only through constructive, and useful debate can we get the module which I personally am most excited for.

Great video, is there any way we could see use of the TPOD and JDAMs? Seems like a very interesting functionality. Also Sidearm depending on how development of that system is coming along? I'm really looking forwards to seeing just how the Harrier deals with modern PGMs

Ok so LGBs will probably be the preferred option, in terms of deploying LGBs, I assume you initially designate the target with the TPOD, lase it to slew the DMT to it, and then conduct a release through the DMT? In that case is there an autolase option given the TPOD has no role in the actual release of the weapon?

In terms of the DMT I'd consider that to be hugely more advanced than the A-10C, assuming no TGP can be used. However that wasn't really my point, what I was asking was what the process for designating and engaging a target with these advanced, albeit barely integrated systems

As a Brit I am a die hard Gr. fan, but equally I plan on buying any and all Harrier versions Razbam releases because...well...its a Harrier! :thumbup:

I'm asking about the workflow for the pilot, the Harrier's systems have been described earlier in the thread as more advanced than the A-10Cs, and a whole lot different. All of these complex targeting systems will be faithfully reproduced, which is what I am asking about since operating the Harrier in combat will be a whole different ballgame to the A-10

Ok, question time. With the DMT, TPOD, and all the other sensors onboard the aircraft seemingly not integrated to such a degree as the A-10, what is the process for finding, designating, and attacking a target with a JDAM or Paveway for example? I am confused how the TPOD integrates with the rest of the avionics

That looks pretty remarkable, such a step closer to the British representation DCS deserves

Absolutely +1 for any kind of British Harrier action, interested about the theatres... :thumbup:

I admire your optimism, my how I want it to be true

I know for a fact my CTRL and E keys will be getting worn down with the Harrier. Our (RAF/RN) Harrier loss rates paled in comparison to our USMC colleagues'

Oh no I completely understand mate, I was simply asking because I'm not sure I've ever seen such unique instability in DCS at all. Some of the aerodynamic idiosyncrasies like rolling in the hover resulting in jet blast hitting the higher wing and inducing an uncontrollable roll makes me question if its even possible in the AFM at all. Don't take this as a criticism, I'm extremely excited to see what the Harrier is like and its more of a fascination of what might be done with it than doubting the quality of it, its truly going to be groundbreaking if/when all of the nasty habits of the airframe are introduced

I have, but in the NATOPS (or what ever the USMC designates their aircraft manuals) some of the more extreme AoA situations in the transition result in some pretty nasty situations: Things like this as far as I know haven't been shown so far

Will the pitch instability during transition, and some of the lateral instability described at high bank angles and high AoA be reproduced? It seems like part of the charm of the Harrier is its ability to turn around and kill you, it would be a shame if it were too tame Many thanks

However, taking the MiG-21 as an example, the model which we have was unable to provide guidance for the Kh-66. Yet due for gameplay reasons the missile was included, so in terms of the DCS environment the IRL use or retirement of a weapon system does not necessarily reflect on the weapon systems provided with the module for one reason or another, a thing which I am whole heartedly in favour of

What I meant was more the very common mission in the MP environment which is 'enemy tanks/infantry/vehicles in a town, go kill' which works just fine if you have a low and slow and/or targeting pod capability, but does not suit the Viggen particularly well

Dear all, As a Viggen pilot it can sometimes be frustrating that the aircraft cannot be employed as it was intended. The AJS37 is not a CAS aircraft, it is not designed to loiter or to search for targets, rather, it is designed as a deep interdictor and penetrator. Waypoints need to be set up for the Viggen to operate successfully in this role. I am aware that the pilot can take coordinates and create the waypoint themselves but this is rather null when the location of targets is not known in the first place. It seems that a lot of MP servers have ground targets which cater for the Su-25 and the A-10 very well, but can we see an evolution which can include deep strike too? I feel it would bring another layer into the MP environment if there was an active 'front' in which the CAS aircraft operated, while a high threat environment existed behind that front in which the Viggen could operate as it was intended, striking high value targets in a strategic sense, in a low and fast, one pass haul ass mentality. Thank you very much for your consideration, please do not take this as criticism MP creators, your work is far better than anything I could do in the editor! :thumbup: Rammit

v i g g e n w a v e

Hi all, Whenever I join a server, within minutes I get kicked out due to a time out issue, sometimes even seconds after joining. This has only started after the update and renders playing on MP impossible. Is there anyone else with this issue? Also, how on earth can I fix it?

Done, come on January...