ESA_maligno

All you need to know:

From virtual cockpit: :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup: get simulate this ?: WWII RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Any ideas on how operated in Korea with the F51D?

Bravo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

both. The time to repair the flight deck, or whether to consider what damage making it suffers irreparable. It would also be interesting to do with the damaged plane ..., if feasible repair, or down to the lower decks, or just throw him overboard "I am considering normal operation on an aircraft carrier" ...., where other aircraft waiting to clear the flight deck where the accident occurred

I wonder if the new carrier WWII LN and their new WWII naval aircraft with flight model, encounter situations when landing as ....: And how can affect damage to the flight deck ? Time to repair? How the damage was repaired within the simulator? Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ahí lo llevas Man!!!!!!!! Well Man!!!!!!!!!!!!

Grumman bought the Chance Vougth ...... ....F4U.. ....... Grumman F6 Hellcat, TBF Avenger ...... but ....., now ...... Not hope!!!!!!

LN did seem a smoke with aircraft of WWII. do not think they go for WWII aircraft. It's a shame ...... :cry:

LN web says 02.03.2015. that's europe date no????? jajaja, no problem....., 1 day more or less.......

Thanks Alicatt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I had not seen !!!!!!!

New carriers?????

A scenario of Midway !!!! ???? Slight terrain modeling with limited Edificion ..... and the whole Pacific Ocean around !!!!!!!

Great logo at the Rudel perfil Something like this....: Corsair, Corsair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :pilotfly: :thumbup:

F4U!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. Thanks LN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:

no, but thanks for your interest; wondering if you thought that was a possibility F4UNL Keep calm!!!!!!!

Greetings. First, thank you very much for this fantastic mod !!!!. I've tweaked some textures of airports to look more befitting a desert environment and they can be used in missions of WWII. No big deal, but I leave here if anyone is interested. Thanks again for the mod Highwayman-Ed. Pd .: modification affects only airports with general textures and is intended for use with this desert mod. Installing with JSGME...................................... LINK AEROPUESTOS TEXTURAS DESERTICAS: https://mega.co.nz/#!KF8iAbLK!xSlEpBAbt934hSnuyTr4YOTPKWJ2ATU0nyakDkPdzlM

And what happened to the famous module that began with F .... and ended in L F4U-NL :pilotfly: :D:D:D; Easier to develop, easier radar, much more information, access to aircraft in flight yet, many more 3D models inherited from other simulators .... I think that the company is more profitable .... also begins ends F and L

AT SERIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D:D:D:D:D:D BUSH PILOTS FOR EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

+10000

Bueno, el tema lo he colgado también en el foro general. Y al final me confirman lo que pensaba. Esa clasificación que hizo Wags, tan solo tiene por finalidad diferenciar entre lo que hace ED y los que se fueron de ED para montar Belsimtek de lo que hagan las otras compañías de desarrollo o los compañeros que quieren aportar algo a DCSW. Es de suponer que si llega al mundo DCSW una compañía de prestigio mundial del mundo de la simulación (no digo nombres para evitar problemas), su desarrollo será de nivel Profesional y como resultado generarán un gran FM. El lío está en la nomenclatura que ha instaurado ED...., creo.

That's what I understand. PFM concerns that are professional (salaried people by ED / BST) those who develop and EFM (other people). But that terminology can never refer to the final result.

If the tools to integrate flight models are the same, I do not understand why an EFM classification is made, would not it be logical to say that ED unknown level flight models until the external community to judge? With all due respect to the work of ED, of course

Based on the review of Wags on EFM and PFM. I guess the EFM is limited compared to the PFM, Wags says: * "Used by our partner developers, the EFM uses only a part of PFM -. Rigid body physics and model contact forces and moments What are Applied to this rigid body aerodynamics and from any other sources except the contact forces is up to EFM developer." So I must assume that the tool to create the EFM is lower than ED to create PFM ?. If yes ...., a developer can create models of flight never higher than ED or Belsimtek. If the answer is no ..., a developer can create better or worse models, based on his work, data, calculations, etc ....