JNASova

Great thanks from me.

I sugest not to use cicrcles.Landing at carrier is not so easy as it looks like. You must watch HSI.At the centre of the HSI you have ILS lines.Horizontal line of the ILS shows you that you are currently taller or lower than it should be.Vertical these shows you the direction of the runway, do you step back to the left or right. Also at HUD,to the upper right and left corner you have the recommended height and speed.You MUST, pay attention at recommended altitude. ALSO,you have to strictly take into account the value of the vertical velocity. Plane computer will lead you to a land on the so-called glade pathern.You must maneuver the plane as the computer says.What better adapt recommendation computers, landing will be more accurate.At night time the only possible.Aircraft's computer guide you at touchdown point,but take note that point is moving forward, going away from you at the speed at which the carrier sail,so maintain a height slightly greater than the recommended.Let the AI do it few times,and watch instruments.

Hello. I would like to do skin for the Su 27.I do not want to do any major change. I want to remove the red star and the emblems of the Russian Air Force and put a tag of another state. I see on the forum that with the changing versions of the game can lead to changes in ways of installing skins.Can I take template skin for Su 27,downloaded from digitalcombatsimulator.com,is it still compatible with 1.2.8. open beta? I see skins at bazar/liveries folder.Is that the right folder? Do I need to replace one of the existing ones, or I can add a new folder with my skin? And what all I have to do to complite this? Thanks in advance.

I dont know how to vote.With some practise and right joystick curve set up, air refueling is not problem.I can do it even with 50USD worth stick.I like to do things at realistic way. Maby YES,for the people who dont want to enter more deeply into this.

Beczl said; "Mig 21 soon will be completed,next project is MiG 23."Now,Beczl is out,situation remain the same? MiG 21 BiS developer said thay allreday started new project,so it means thay allredy started to work at MiG 23?

In 1970, Northrop won the International Fighter Aircraft (IFA) competition to replace the F-5A, with better air-to-air performance against aircraft like the Soviet MiG-21. The resultant aircraft, initially known as F-5A-21, subsequently became the F-5E. It had more powerful (5,000 lbf) General Electric J85-21 engines, and had a lengthened and enlarged fuselage, accommodating more fuel. Its wings were fitted with enlarged leading edge extensions, giving an increased wing area and improved maneuverability. The aircraft's avionics were more sophisticated, crucially including a radar (initially the Emerson Electric AN/APQ-153) (the F-5A and B had no radar). It retained the gun armament of two M39 cannon, one on either side of the nose) of the F-5A. Various specific avionics fits could be accommodated at customer request, including an inertial navigation system, TACAN and ECM equipment.[17] And again,F 4 is two seat plane.Maby you vould like F 4 with AIM 120C agais MiG 21 BiS and MiG 23.Soppose that vould be fair fight for you.

Read more carefully. SSSR clame it was 2:1,not 1:2 as USAF clame. USAF pilots said if thay had to get back thry the time,and do everything again,thay vould prefer to be in MIG 21,than F 4 cocpit.They also argued that it is the opinion of the vast majority of pilots.I am not shure did I watch that interview at Discavery or youtube,but soppose that interview can be found at youtube. I cant get more clear than this.

What does it mean BFM? DCS MiG 23 vould be nice to fly.It is true there is no right oponent.So fine solution vould be DCS F5.In my opinion it is right oponent for DCS MiG 21 and DCS MiG 23.

SSSR sources clame 2:1.So who lie now?I chose to belive USAF pilots statement given at Discavery TV chanel interview.Thay had no any interest to lie.Thay also clame that kill ratio was at phantom side,but no 2:1.So,source was not Discavery,than USAF fighter pilots.And thay said if thay vould have to be in all that agian,thay vould like to be in MiG cocpit. One thing you need to keep in your mind.It was conflict US top phantom version agains SSSR export version.

Search on youtube.I watched intervieves at Discavery TV chanel also.Found same things at some books at library.I will thry to find one of the intervievs at youtube again.

MiG 21 need rival,but it shud be F 5.The F-4 is two seat.

This is not true.Best prof for that is statement almost all USAF fighter pilots who participate at Vietnam war. On the question if thay can back the time,wich aircraft vould like to be in,MiG or Phantom.Almost all answered MiG.:thumbup: Especialy at the begining of the war,Phantom had many problems.One of them was falling in to the spin,so MiGs where shoting them down at big numbers.

Thanks Karambiatos. I was waiting this scientist to give me answer :megalol:

Can we get possibility to create train in mission editor,to chose is there gonna be passinger train,cargo train or liquid cargo trane and set his pathern?Cars and locomotives allready have been made,so we need option to control them. This would have the opportunity to create a mission in which the striker aircrafts were tasked to destroy a train that runs between the two cities...

How to do that with Su 27 in FC3?

MiG 23 is great idea!

As far as I have noticed,discount is every three months,something like that.

Black out is present,but not visivible to me.I simply lose control for few seconds,but no black screen.

Russian aircraft are designed to take off from the fields,leveled by construction machines.One of the measurement in the case of the nuclear war and airports destructions.There are many videos at you tube with MiG 21 and MiG 29 taking of from the field.Thats why MiG 29 has grid at uper side air intakes.During the taking off,main intakes are closed,to prevent that rocks enter in to the engine during take off from fields. Best practise for "soft" Landing is to practise landing with full Su 25T,full tank and full weapons.If you can land full Su 25T,you can land F15 with no problem.:)

Good job.

A net that separates the map into sectors is done bad. Sectors overlap.Somebody has done a rectangular grid, then it is simply rotated a few degrees and overlapped one over other.Looks ugly,and it is incorect.DCS is so big and respectable project,that such kind things are simply NOT ALLOWED. And why I cant add some reputation to you? :)

Thanks for the link.Good job.Nice to see that somebody working on the map.Wrong thing is that job is done by you,not ED. You can add height relative to sea level of the airports.English expresion elevation,or barometric altitude,I am not shure. There are some problems with the map,but it is not your fault.It is done wrong in FC 3 misson editor.Open tactical map for FC 2.Pay attention on Sochi Adler area.Than open your FC 3 map and watch same area.You can notice that there is something wrong with FC 3 map .Looks empty.Hils didnt painted brown,and contour lines looks bad.You dont have feeling that you are watching the map.Or,by watching FC 3 map you can conclude that space shown on the map is flat.But white colour mean high mountines.What to think?

Why do you need more than 60 on shkval? With target size 60 you can lock ships,buildings and planes.Why do you need some more,for wich targets?

It is not.There is no few airports added in FC3.

Yes,but this is for FC2 and BS1,done by =MAF=Mongoose.I,and hoppe and the others would like to have the same for DCS FC3.