Schmidtfire

After some experimenting... Try set Horizontal/Vertical Axis to: Deadzone: 5 Saturation X: 100 Saturation Y: 90 Curvature: 45 Be gentle and light on the stick and the slewing should be quite nice with these settings :)

I also have a similar Auto issue with my TWCS throttle. The target "diamond" jumps around without any chance of fine control. Same Axis control works great for Radar and Mav slew. It seems like the same issue as slewing TGP on the Harrier with the controls binded to an axis...

I think that someone at Razbam should take a closer look at the FM, because there is no way Av-8B can be that sensitive. Seven pounds is enough to tip the aircraft? That would also explain the extreme imbalance and danger when a single bomb is dropped...

Around 50% of the time I cannot designate my selected waypoint. I try to designate a waypoint by clicking on WPDSG, but nothing happens. It flashes fast on the HUD and then nothing... No TGT, no box around WPSDG on MPCD. Just trying to figure out if this is a bug or if Im doing something wrong on my side. Controls has not been double mapped or set to toggle switch. Hope that someone here knows more about this... Thx EDIT. This user has the same issue https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=224476

We already have the condition: BOMB IN ZONE But with MISSILE IN ZONE condition, we can create triggers that switch SAM AI on/off if HARM missile is present in the triggerzone. Or if the MISSILE QUANTITY is > 2 the SAM AI turns off or something along those lines. It should have some option of probability to activate in %. Best solution would ofc be if we can set som kind of threat reaction for SAM's in the ME. But this solution can get the ball rolling towards more varied and interesting missions. EDIT - FOUND THE MISSILE IN ZONE tab..... Please delete this ;) THX

No. I have the WT stick and Undesignate/NWS it is only binded to my nosewheel steering button...

Good news, thanks :)

Would HARM be a viable Air-Air weapon? Lets say Im out of air-air missiles, but still have a HARM left. Su-27 closing in and painting me with it’s radar... in theory It should go after that radar. And since the HARM does not have a radar of any kind, the launch would go undetected. Except the big smoketrail ofc..

Please. This is a known bug. Already confirmed by USSR_Rik. It happens with Water set to High in options. Put it on Medium and the flicker will go away. Sorry if I come off as rude, but it has been brought up before and thats what you have to do to fix it.

Im still having issue with this. Sometime it works, sometimes it does not. Tried an MP mission online. First flight went well, I could designate a waypoint. After a respawn I tried the same thing and I could not designate! I can select the waypoint but I can't designate. When I do, it flickers on/off. If anyone has found a solution, please help =)

+1

+1. Hope they fix. Really ruins the immersion in VR :(

It is usually a pain in multiplayer VR, as it cannot be turned off. I hope that ED change that :(

Seems like a lot is being lost in translation. But say if it is true... How about older Aim-7 variants like E and F versions, do they have these features IRL? If so, R-27 seems like a very flawed missile in comparison... Maybe the Soviets invented the 27ER to try ”counter” this no variable pn flaw? From what I have read the R-27R suffered from short legs maybe it was partially due to missile navigation flaws?

I know MiG-19P is the focus of this project. But since there has been talks of an additional MiG-19S, I have a suggestion how to add additional value. As an option the ability to carry GAR-8 and Aim-9P for upgraded Pakistan/Egypt versions. It will greatly extend the useability in different scenarios without crossing the boundry of realism. Or not by much anyway. The Aim-9P will also make MiG-19S more relevant in a 1970/1980's scenario :) Also creating a great choice/tradeoff: MiG-19S with a better missile but without radarscope. MiG-19P has radarscope but older missiles. Or for a straight "oldschool scenario" go MiG-19 guns only and pylons removed. That will cover a lot of missions as it can be a MiG-19S/F-6/J-6 variant mixture (depending on what loadout is selected). More content for mission editors and players, and relatively easy to integrate as GAR-8 and AiM-9P missiles are already in DCS.

I have not tried this mission, but maybe communicate better with your wingmen? Make sure they are on their toes and contribute to the fight :)

No, it’s too old. But it has a simple RWR (rear aspect only)

In my opinion, level of digital combat simulation is up to the user, not the module. FC3 modules can be flown very seriously as a ”hardcore” sim and clickable modules can be flown with ridiculous payloads or flown by total clowns. The aircraft is just one component of the total sim experience. Tactics, mission planning, proper radio calls, ATC communication, navigation etc. all add up to what level of sim you fly. Not just the module fidelity.

First. I am very unbiased. I fly both Blue and Red. Mostly Blue. The Aim-120 is a much more advanced and superior missile. There is not a doubt about that. Just questioning if the guidance logic is correct on the 27ER. Even if it does not loft, I highly doubt that the Soviet/Russians would design a missile that pulls too much G's, bleeding energy like a stuck pig. That was somewhat fixed with pn on other missiles like the Aim-120, Aim-7 and R-77. And that's really why I wondered about 27ER updates in the first place :)

Ok, thanks for the info :) 3:40 into the video he mentions the Amraam vs 27ER. "Okie" has 6000hrs in different fighters. 850 traps (300 night). A-4, F-14, F-5 agressor pilot, F-16 etc. Very knowledgeable about air-air combat and tactics. But it might be bad memory or the Aim-120A he compare it against... Great Q/A, and another one recently came out.

What? So it has already been changed? I thought it would recieve new navigation/flight characteristics to fly more efficiently... Range has always been extended compared to the 27R. 27ER should (according to Keith "Okie" Nance) outrange the Aim-120, don't know if that is still the case with the new Aim-120 updates...

It’s kind of difficult to value DCS trainers in general. In one way they are complex to make (due to the dual cockpit design) but they are also a niché within a niché, so there are fewer buyers. So a big investment for a smaller return. L-39, C-101 and Hawk all came along in a time when there was few modules to choose from and trainers offered something new. With the growing list of modules, It’s hard to see that a new trainer would be viable from a commercial point. I believe that the C-101 will be the last trainer we see for a long long time. It has to be a total passion project or order from a company/organization (Yak-52)

I understood that. But why would you fork over 60$ for a ”single seat” 2-seat trainer? 60$ is to much even for a two-seater. I understand that pricing is somewhat subjective, but a trainer in my opinion should be around 39.99$ max. Content wise, it is not near the bigger modules like A-10C, F/A-18C or upcoming F-14.

As with a working map-case, adjustable rudder pedals, electrical cart at startup, ”tap” to check gauges etc. Attention to detail has always been impressive on C-101 :)

Since the Aim-120 and Aim-7 has been updated, any news on R-27ER updates? Let's see that Extended Range come to life :D