Ahmed

I am happy to see that this area is being looked at. The "feel" of the flight model was always weird for me, but that is a difficult point to argue in a flightsim. I have to say guys that when I bought the M2000C on early access I was very critical with its state. But one sure thing that you have demonstrated all the time since then is that you keep working on your products until you perfect them. Kudos on that! Looking forward to the release of the Harrier as well! :smilewink:

Thanks Beamscanner. It definitely seems that BSK may have misunderstood their doc sources when coding the SEARCH button as initially simulated, as many posted before. Regarding the PRF audio debate, things get a little bit more delicate, due to the simulated ALR-87 being such an unknown model. The fact of having a HANDOFF button on the panel could suggest that the system has that capability. On the other hand, the button could also have been carried on from the ALR-46 to save costs on certification, and the button could have no function on the ALR-87 as stated on the DCS F5E manual... As long as the SEARCH button gets fixed I can live with the rest :)

Lens angle also depends on wind conditions (WOD). Best option IMO would be to let the mission builder decide the base GP angle using the ME. Ideal option would be to have an LSO view and allow for the LSO to change it live on a multiplayer session (maybe even MOVLAS but that's probably asking for too much)

This is an incredibly non-sensing point of view. Some people bought BS2 for less than 20USD. Most upgraders bought BS1 + BS2 upgrade for 60. And yet cichlidfan, you accuse those guys, that I remind you are among the earliest supporters of ED's work, of taking the cheap and easy way out... I don't mind the hassle of installing BS1 before installing the upgrade module at all (as ED are stubborn with their policy regarding the upgrade), as long as I kept being provided activations for my BS1 as I change my hardware, because I noticed that they are not being recharged every month...

As additional trivia for this matter, several of the stories in the book A-10s over Kosovo (recommended read for anyone owning the mod) recount how SEAD support was considered essential for CAS operations during Op. Allied Force, and how operation areas were systematically shut down when the SEAD had to RTB or make a trip to the tanker.

Yep, I tested and it is fixed. Good job.

Crosswind effects are definitely not fixed

Tried crosswind landings. - Aircraft doesn't crab into the wind at all, seems directionally unaffected by it - Tends to roll into the wind (expect to encounter downwind roll, if any) Test mission attached with 20 m/s (~40kt) crosswind xw.miz

During taxi a considerable amount of thrust is needed to maintain the speed. Idle thrust results in a massive deceleration. Seems like ground friction is exaggerated in the current flight model : EDIT: Example of real taxiing. Notice power is needed to start rolling but then it can easily coast for a while, as any other jet (skip to 7:00)

Hi, So I found literally no information in the manual about the effect of the different radar jamming filters. I only see some symbology changing when I depress them while painting a jamming hog but no noticeable effect. Same goes on for the SPS switches. Most of them are mentioned but not described in the manual. Any light on the current implementation of these systems?