Jump to content

BadHabit

Members
  • Posts

    719
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BadHabit

  1. Happy birthday Fishbed!
  2. Pitot tube maybe. Forgotten or failing? Sent from my iQE100 using Tapatalk
  3. BadHabit

    G

    Quickly before sound mods get IC!! Sent from my iQE100 using Tapatalk
  4. Ofc obvious! daaaa...But have you considered the "not drivable" option in mission builder?
  5. Last night i joined us cmdr abd i all u could see were my coalition units. How can someone abuse the other coalition units? Sent from my iQE100 using Tapatalk
  6. ${1} In this video among others, we can see the main problem that the Mig-21 has "among others". Very stiff controls and sensitive control surfaces. Move the stick 1% the aircraft starts banking which gives no time for corrections. Curvatures don't really matter since the in pit stick-control surfaces movement is instant. The stick in-cockpit should have a travel range before control surfaces respond depending on speed and etc. Take a look at T/O And in flight and Hope this stuff we trigger some movement in the devs team. I see ppl flying this thing nowadays like a boat which is normal since the modeling of the stick to surfaces system is so damn wrong. PEACE!
  7. Almighty Irony!
  8. Arrange HAVCAP flights if you can, ask for FORCAP if you will and definitely do MIGCAPs :P If the server is empty that's another story.
  9. Use Escorts AI, or even better escort it yourselfs!
  10. I don't really see a problem for being reluctant. History was there to transform to our need, if however everyone could have assets packs in a manner.
  11. Instant after Normandy released the WWII then south for the main map of DCS, while we could have historical scenarios that took place on the region, whilst it was in 1942 and the AC's we got are late models, but who cares?! Bring the WWII back on Caucasus please! :pilotfly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Caucasus
  12. Because battlefields were always balanced..
  13. If we use it, we would like to keep that, wouldn't we?
  14. Disable the option on the mission editor by forcing no external views. Its very simple.
  15. Guys a few points for the server. Most of you are against the label mod for a simple dot just a few pixels to help with the terrible visibility because there is a possibility that someone can see that dot (if the are carefully looking) through the cockpit or a cloud layer, yet I see no comments about external views especially the padlock F5 key in all missions! WTH?! Use of A-10 with no era oriented weaponry plus A-A missiles from the future. This included A-10's, Hawks and Su-25's and the Viggens 74's even R-60M's. You can't have everyone pleased. One A-10 can destroy large number of units with no effort even in a contested area. Plus it is out of the era. I would love to see areas of interest in the map for strike missions. Infrastructure, ports, radio towers, fuel tanks etc. Would make a lot more fun time to plan than few GT and mostly pvp. Bases are impossible to reach with a huge amount of Sam systems and AAA is on excellent making strafing runs even on the FABS a no go. We need a more suitable environment for the Mig-21 and the F-5, possibly a good solution for the sabre and mig-15. And since this is almost the only server I hope my words reach your ears.
  16. Doesn't make sense that a WIP product is available in a release brunch. Sorry won't bite. And I have zero hopes of this being solved following that road, as many engines may come and go. It is still 2D.
  17. ED just has to sanitize themselves and give ultra high priority to visibility above all else.
  18. Also noticed that delay but seems to me more natural for the engines to behave like that than instantly going on AB. Don't know if u noticed that if you push the throttle fast for full AB the RPM idling a bit to >90 then going up again but if you slowly advance the throttle RPM are maxing normally to AB power. Seems to me very realistic.
  19. What about your maneuvering when you trying to launch? 2-3g max
  20. So damn True. REP! Yes there IS :D So far the only AC's I feel simulate some kind of what you say is simulated turbulence is the F-5 and the Mig-21 (ground effect), but turbulence is not created only by being on landing with bad weather. You should feel it in Clouds, in some random moment when atmospheric condition are met and should be more violent regarding your ac's condition/load. DCS simplifies those things too much for a sim and ignores them. It is so simplified that an AC will drift from the runway/taxiway on crosswind conditions when on wheels.:doh:
  21. Mig-28 refers to the red coalition. I think we have cooler and more camouflage wise livery's for the F-5
  22. I am suggesting to the admin to make a poll about it and it's not only me. You are forcing your opinion by bulling all over. Go find another tree to pee You have no power here.
  23. Is this your server? Why you playing admin? Go find another tree to pee on.
×
×
  • Create New...