Teknetinium

Thx for your understanding Blaze. 51st has a solution/rule for matches that might get to long if both teams agree on playing a finale round.

This is a tournament!!! We have to fly with weapons from same decades. Realistic and simple if we stay to the rule where opponents use weapons from same decade. We don't have any weapons that can match AIM-120C if we dont use R-77 on Su-27. So the realistic approach is to use AIM-120B vs ER-27 or do early 80s and late 80s where all aircraft get benefits. For SATAC 2017, 51st chose to mix early and late 80s with two consecutive rounds to win in order to benefit all parts and make it as fair as possible. When I say fair I don't mean balance, I mean weapons from same decade!!!

Switching between early and late 80s is a realistic approach we can do for a tournament, AWACS is there for all aircraft. Different time frames suite different aircraft's. SATAC 2018 will include active-missiles. So far the most even match was Team China vs NP, respective teams were flying Su-27 vs F-15 resulting Team China winning in F-15.

Lets just pretend it was a fuse failure. Thanks all who are participating/helping and extra thanks to streamers showing it to public. We are trying our best to suit times for respective matches. SATAC weekend one can be re-watched on this link: https://go.twitch.tv/videos/182446844 51st PVO Regiment wish all a joyful SATAC 2017.

Moltars SATAC 2017 Live Stream. https://go.twitch.tv/m01tar_

Moltar's SATAC 2017 streaming. https://www.splashonegaming.com/moltar https://go.twitch.tv/videos/182179126

We all go straight to hell.

Signed up 1vs1.

Norrköping, I lile it.

Outstanding!!!

Yes it did, much appreciated, thank you!!!

Fortunately Su-27/33 have a G-limiter, Would be appreciated if the G-limiter could be addressed for Su-33 and Su-27 rudders.

51st are honored to welcome back the current SATAC Champions!!! Welcome 104th to SATAC 2017 /0.

We might look in to it next SATAC, had no time to test it properly to see what it dose to IC and if it is buggy. Bushmanni you are more then welcome to 51st Regiment to talk about how we can get the event even better. TS Ip: 92.232.46.28 Lets try to stick to the topic of signing up.

Squadron Name: 51st PVO Aircraft Selection. 6*Su-27 Pilot Roster: <51>Frostie (+1 Zulu) <51>Teknetinium (+2 Zulu) <51>Rage (+1 Zulu) <51>Moli (+2 Zulu) <51>Scarface (+8 Zulu) <51>Seetricks (+9 Zulu) <51P>Slutcher (+8 Zulu) <51P>Moltar (-7 Zulu) <51K>Croncat (+2 Zulu) <51K>Krippz (-7 Zulu) <51K>Yaga (-7 Zulu)

We all are very grateful as DCS community having Heatblure Simulations with us. You are doing great job and getting more fans as we speak for your close relationship with costumers and DCS enthusiasts. Good luck and wish you a smooth ride a long the way Heatblure Simulations. Thank you for the update.

We are very close to make the announcement for S.A.T.A.C 2017!!!

My first one as well, Loved it.

LOL Great Maverick!!!

Thank you all in 104th who made this possible. looking forward for the next one.

Look at F-22 ;)

Its been there from day one Su-27 PFM was out. The question is if it is realistic that you dont have more down-trim authority after 950-960. I find it very irritating. Another thing is that if you trim down you dont have full authority to pull up, you need to go trim reset to get it, dont know if that realistic as well?

Yes technology gets better but physics still apply. Bigger dish with same technology or bigger power output is still stronger then the smaller one. If that was not the case F-22 would be smaller then F-35.

It all depend what area you defend or attack. MIG-31 for Switzerland might be a bad idea, But for Russia you can not find better. And yes size do matter, bigger radar dishes, stronger power output, stronger processor, more fuel and so on. Thats why I find it funny when F-18C radar react on Chaff in one video but some believe aim-120 would not, those who believe that dont believe in Physics.

Thank you for your work helping so many to understand Su-27S systems.