Teknetinium

What makes you think that ED have more intel on ER/ET-27 tracking now compere to FC1/FC2/FC3?

Cap'n kamikaze, The problem is now that you don't get a realistic representation of RL, because pilots have intelligence about how good missiles are and take risks accordingly compare to RL. This need to bee looked at by ED in order to bring back the tactical aspect of DCS. I would assume that modern air combat community were happier whit how missiles tracked in FC1/FC2/FC3, And there is no prove that missiles was less realistic then. Fly paths of missiles have changed to the better, but reducing tracking to this extend compare to before makes me wonder about what intel :) I would like to argue that late FC3 to DCS 1.5.3 missiles tracking made DCS modern air to air community much more war thunder like on MP servers.

Su-27S compare to F-15C have (telekodavoju informacuju) data link. That is what makes Su-27 agreat flanker whit EOS. I guise ED is working on it, since it is working in singelplayer.

Trust me 51st know how to adapt to new tactics, the question is not about that rather then that the simulation alows way to mutch risk at the moment.

Blaze, what was wrong whit Blinking jammers, it was more alive and felt more real to me compare to now. Nothing makes jammers more RL in DCS1.5.3 It was removed only becouse it broke TWS lock :) funny that IA blink jammers now thou:) I hope ED get it sorted soon, It has been a long wait. Modern Air Combat Need to find a fundation. We need some love ED.

We all adjust and fly by simulations limits, I dont blame any fighter pilot for his way of flying. It is EDs jobb to find the settings that brings a more realistic representation and behavier from fighter pilots. ED are doing grate in that respect where missiles fly paths feel more alive and realistic.

Have I mentioned balance ? I talk about people exploit bad tracking of missiles that leads to unrealistic behavior on MP servers. I have no proof how good missiles should track. But if ED had some intel to set the missiles in FC1/FC2/FC3. In those versions missiles had better tracking witch in my opinion leads to more realistic MP environment. Because pilots need to take popper action and not do some straight in flying in to ET/ER whit no fear because you have countermeasures.

PLZ ED Make MP community respect ER/ET lunches, it is not realistic at all when people exploit bad tracking of ER-27 and ET-27. You have to understand that DCS pilots evade way more missiles then RL pilots. So we take bigger risk because DCS gives way to big reward at the moment when you do that. There is no evidence that tracking of missiles was less realistic in FC1/FC2/FC3 compare to DCS 1.5.3. Tracking needs to be set to a respectable value. It is not funny.

Same, no problem whit trim rather then when going autopilot off. If you don't use FFB joystick you need to find autopilots trim setting/position on your stick in order to have smoth transition.

YoYo, Since our stick is centered when we go autopilot off we need to find the position of the trim. Could it be possible to have a option to save the trim setting for us who don't use FFB sticks?

LN are doing outstanding job on MIG-21, I will for sure get their future products. Keep up the good work and plz make some more Soviet aircraft ;)

ER-27 track better in 1.5. Much appreciated ED. There must be some respect for missiles.

Trimming is fine to me as well.

Do you have planes to compensate for those who don't use FFB sticks? Could be added in Special options. To compensate for it could be done by saving autopilot attitude when going autopilot off.

Great News!

That you need to trim the aircraft to the speed is quite natural. Autopilot is a different story, If you use autopilot in real Su-27 the hydraulics would move the stick to the position autopilot is trimming it to. So if you would go autopilot off you would hold the stick in same position and only compensate for acceleration. While most of us in DCS dont have stick moved by hydraulics accordingly to autopilot, that make us to compensate for finding the right position of autopilot and at the same time compensate for acceleration. ED made it right only that we dont have sticks that move with the autopilot:(

I like it :)

I want it!!!

Seams it have been forgotten that Su-27 fans made this sim possible.

Welcome!!!

2:51 the paratrooper looks scared, cool video.