Teknetinium

Yes it did, much appreciated, thank you!!!

Fortunately Su-27/33 have a G-limiter, Would be appreciated if the G-limiter could be addressed for Su-33 and Su-27 rudders.

51st are honored to welcome back the current SATAC Champions!!! Welcome 104th to SATAC 2017 /0.

We might look in to it next SATAC, had no time to test it properly to see what it dose to IC and if it is buggy. Bushmanni you are more then welcome to 51st Regiment to talk about how we can get the event even better. TS Ip: 92.232.46.28 Lets try to stick to the topic of signing up.

Squadron Name: 51st PVO Aircraft Selection. 6*Su-27 Pilot Roster: <51>Frostie (+1 Zulu) <51>Teknetinium (+2 Zulu) <51>Rage (+1 Zulu) <51>Moli (+2 Zulu) <51>Scarface (+8 Zulu) <51>Seetricks (+9 Zulu) <51P>Slutcher (+8 Zulu) <51P>Moltar (-7 Zulu) <51K>Croncat (+2 Zulu) <51K>Krippz (-7 Zulu) <51K>Yaga (-7 Zulu)

We all are very grateful as DCS community having Heatblure Simulations with us. You are doing great job and getting more fans as we speak for your close relationship with costumers and DCS enthusiasts. Good luck and wish you a smooth ride a long the way Heatblure Simulations. Thank you for the update.

We are very close to make the announcement for S.A.T.A.C 2017!!!

My first one as well, Loved it.

LOL Great Maverick!!!

Thank you all in 104th who made this possible. looking forward for the next one.

Look at F-22 ;)

Its been there from day one Su-27 PFM was out. The question is if it is realistic that you dont have more down-trim authority after 950-960. I find it very irritating. Another thing is that if you trim down you dont have full authority to pull up, you need to go trim reset to get it, dont know if that realistic as well?

Yes technology gets better but physics still apply. Bigger dish with same technology or bigger power output is still stronger then the smaller one. If that was not the case F-22 would be smaller then F-35.

It all depend what area you defend or attack. MIG-31 for Switzerland might be a bad idea, But for Russia you can not find better. And yes size do matter, bigger radar dishes, stronger power output, stronger processor, more fuel and so on. Thats why I find it funny when F-18C radar react on Chaff in one video but some believe aim-120 would not, those who believe that dont believe in Physics.

Thank you for your work helping so many to understand Su-27S systems.

I would like to take the opportunity informing dedicated Su-27 pilots that 51st PVO is looking for Pilots. Apply at Cadet Application Desk: http://forum.51st.org/ http://www.51st.org/

<51>Teknetinium - MIG-15

I hope ED find the time eventually, would be a shame since the model has so great PFM.

Thx for sharing the process, very interesting.

We all thought that Data-link for Su-27 would be developed for SP and Client to client when Chiz announced it in a interview. I wish ED best luck in all projects so we can get to Su-27S/SM development as fast as possible. So far Im finding Su-27s air-dynamic in DCS by far the most enjoyable, would be a shame if we did not get Su-27 in full fidelity:(

As i know Chiz gave us a reply that Su-27 data-link in MP will only be implemented when ED make Su-27 in full fidelity. Lets hope F-18 gets done so Su-27 can get some attention. keep up the good work ED, your Su-27 fanboys/girls are waiting.

51st pilots have been doing it for over a year now, SARH is not tracking better when I change PRF. The main issue is chaff resistance. Or that SARH reacts to chaff when it is not in its field of view, No matter PRF. Aim-7 is not doing better when guided by F-15.

When we have F-14 flying more people will use SARH missiles and the outcry will not only be done by so called Su-27 fanboys.

That modern IR missiles missed or had malfunction is not a justification for pilots in DCS not have to go idle as in previous versions. It ads to dynamic that if you want to have a 100% chance to survive against a modern IR missiles you need to be idle to cool down the heatblure. Removing that dynamic from the most modern IR missiles is a little bit over the top, we are not talking R-60s on Mig-21. I would assume Su-27 NIIP N001 radar output, processing power and rejection of countermeasures from 8-5km is better then AIM-120B and C combined. The main issue for SARH missiles is that they miss from head on situations or when there is no chaff in their scanning path. This leads to that MP players don't respect a SARH or a IR lunch. That is not realistic if we want to simulate RL. We need to take in to account how MP pilots will react to a missile after 3 years of evading them. If missiles don't pose a threat MP community starts to exploit that and tactics get less important then payload.

I want it :)