Teknetinium

In order to get realistic reaction from pilots is only possible if missile pose a danger. I dont see a problem in Su-27 using R-77 in order to get some reaction from pilots. Other option could be to fly 80s. The best solution would be if ED could make SARH and modern heaters more respected by pilot that are defending them.

Compared Er-27PK to Aim-120Pk in 104th Server stats, That gave me a general Idea.

Lets get strait to the point: 1. since there is no info on how good missile are tracking a educational guise has to be made. And the educational guise can change with more info getting up to the surface or with technical advancements with in the simulator engine it self. It has been proven with new versions in DCS. This gives room to make changes to missiles tracking in order to get closer to reality. 2. I agree that Pk should be for SARH missiles around 30%, as it is now in SP. The issue is in MP because of different reasons as ping or anything els brings the PK down to 17% or 20%. This shots are taken from no escape zone as 15km-10km-7km. If we could get PK to 30% in MP as it is in SP a lot of SARH problems would be solved. 3. in older versions Heater as aim-9 or R-73 were not that easy to spoof by countermeasures, you had to go idle and pop flares, if you had power on heaters would hit. This is not the case right now where a full after-burning aircraft pops some flares and the missile miss, 4. All this combined with SARH + heaters are much less reliable compare to actives makes tactics really hard to employ. from 7km Aim-120 is posing a deadly threat while heaters and SARH missiles pose no threat if countermeasures are employed. This was not the case in older versions of DCS and was much more realistic from tactical point of view. I hope ED can address some of this concerns in order to get more realistic reaction from pilots when SARH or a Heater is lunched.

Su-27S, Su-27SM, SU-34, Su-33, Su-35, Su-30, Su-30M Any of them would give a big profit and please many virtual pilots out there. Mig-29K, Mig-23x, Mig-25/Mig-31 Su-25M, Su-24x Mi-24x, Just my wet dream :)

I hope ED implement the safe system for lateral-Gs soon. In RL Su-27 have a safe-system as for the G-limits. Broke my tailfins by using rudders to hard in order to get a faster roll. Hard to catch you self in stressed situation.

Hold the radar button when you are pointed at you target, then release it. If pipper becomes as big as aircraft's wingspan you aim at means there's a good return. ground clutter block your radar to get a good return.

the proper enemy is Mig-23 an Mig-27. But Im sure there were situations where Mig-21 Bis was involved. Great news, cant wait to get my hands on this lovely aircraft. Would like the Fighter version as well. Lets hope leatherneck dose two versions as for the F-14, I would not mind if you had to pay for different version.

Nice adition to CA, need to test it.

By the way I need to correct my self, ED has stated that missiles are in the works.

"If you're flying US (not UK) aircraft and fire an aim9 you must assume the pK to be 5%. the data suggests the Aim9 has been downgraded between the Falklands conflict and Desert Storm. it's the only data we have to go on, assuming better performance would be guessing games. Ill say it again: pK on its own means nothing. Please try to understand." Rage.

Ridiculous!!! Sams in Vietnam had better tracking, Dont ED missile developers think that what is shown i the acmi track will not be exploited in events and championships :) Can ED missile developers show me tactics I should use to counter what is shown in Ragnaroks acmi-track? Or at least confirm that R/ER-27 are broken. Su-27 squads are on our knees for three years already, we can not adapt any further when there is no respect for a missile lunch, plz help us!!!

LOL, That' s dramatic, and no go for MP environment, you speed was not slower then 240km/h. IR missiles don't have any flare-filter as well they go for first flare you pop.

Its clear that missiles need to track better, or Su-27 will be forced to fly only Aim-7 vs R-27 or aim-120C vs R-77. Why not make missiles track as in FC2? SATAC 2013 was a good example that ER-27 were useless then, it is almost 2016 and there is no response from ED rather then just downgrading missiles every patch. I really hope as well that SU-27 and MIG-29 pilots get some love we deserve. Dedicated Air 2 Air squads are on their knees :) If any ED missile developers are interested, I can send the tracks from SATAC 2013, you to analyse how air 2 air tactics looked FC2 compare to late FC3. The change is to dramatic if you ask me.

Lets hope ED gets it sorted as soon as possible since this is getting exploited big time in MP, SARH missiles are not a threat at all.

Would be good if it was possible to place message window on top of the screen and make it wider.

Nickname: <51>Teknetinium Your profile at ED forum: http://forums.eagle.ru/member.php?u=41598 Chosen plane type: MIG-15bis Country of residence: Sweden Time: GMT +1 Language of communication: English/Russian Confirmation of familiarization with regulations of the tournament and the obligation to comply with them: Familiarized with regulations of this tournament, oblige myself to comply with them.

When MIG-21 get locked in DCS you dont see where you are locked from, Im sure thats is not a bug rather then simulating what you are describing about defecting MIG-21s. But when MIG-21 defeat the Aim-120, the RWR keeps screaming compare to older patches. I assume something is here that was not intended by ED.

They are defiantly not perfect, Would F-15 RWR face same problems? I believe it is a bug since Mig-21 RWR/ Ka-50 Laser warning system are broken at the moment from what I read on forums. Any testers that know if it is intentional or a bug? I have been saying before that by making RWR not as reliable would make Air2Air combat more realistic, But I would like it to be realistic not only for Su-27S:)

Is it possible to integrity check the view settings? integrety check view setting is critical for MP environment.

Holimoli in 51st have experienced same problem several times on 104th MP server!!!

I would assume that FC1 and FC2 was more accurate because pilots ware reacting more realistically to threats, F-15 had bigger advantage in BVR compare to now, as it should be when using aim-120 vs ER-27.

The problem is that this is a simulator and we all exploiting it because it is. I want to get as close to RL tactic and a reaction from a pilot when you lunch. At the moment ER-27 appose to little threat, witch leads to much more aggressive flying. In FC1 and FC2 F-15 had far more advantage compere to now while missiles were tracking better. At that time you could actually make a BVR kill compare to now.

What dose support you theory? And what makes you think that missiles tracking was less realistic in FC1/FC2/FC3? You just assume it is right since ED say so, But if you fly and try to employ tactics you find your self in very frustrating situation when everyone know that 90% of Soviet missile miss, go 10m and pop some flares and you can stay hot whit no fear against Soviet missiles. I would like you to try that in RL, The simulator result in how good you are in exploiting instead of using tactics. Vietnam SAMS had better tracking then ER-27:)

Agree 100%