Teknetinium

Lets hope ED gets it sorted as soon as possible since this is getting exploited big time in MP, SARH missiles are not a threat at all.

Would be good if it was possible to place message window on top of the screen and make it wider.

Nickname: <51>Teknetinium Your profile at ED forum: http://forums.eagle.ru/member.php?u=41598 Chosen plane type: MIG-15bis Country of residence: Sweden Time: GMT +1 Language of communication: English/Russian Confirmation of familiarization with regulations of the tournament and the obligation to comply with them: Familiarized with regulations of this tournament, oblige myself to comply with them.

When MIG-21 get locked in DCS you dont see where you are locked from, Im sure thats is not a bug rather then simulating what you are describing about defecting MIG-21s. But when MIG-21 defeat the Aim-120, the RWR keeps screaming compare to older patches. I assume something is here that was not intended by ED.

They are defiantly not perfect, Would F-15 RWR face same problems? I believe it is a bug since Mig-21 RWR/ Ka-50 Laser warning system are broken at the moment from what I read on forums. Any testers that know if it is intentional or a bug? I have been saying before that by making RWR not as reliable would make Air2Air combat more realistic, But I would like it to be realistic not only for Su-27S:)

Is it possible to integrity check the view settings? integrety check view setting is critical for MP environment.

Holimoli in 51st have experienced same problem several times on 104th MP server!!!

I would assume that FC1 and FC2 was more accurate because pilots ware reacting more realistically to threats, F-15 had bigger advantage in BVR compare to now, as it should be when using aim-120 vs ER-27.

The problem is that this is a simulator and we all exploiting it because it is. I want to get as close to RL tactic and a reaction from a pilot when you lunch. At the moment ER-27 appose to little threat, witch leads to much more aggressive flying. In FC1 and FC2 F-15 had far more advantage compere to now while missiles were tracking better. At that time you could actually make a BVR kill compare to now.

What dose support you theory? And what makes you think that missiles tracking was less realistic in FC1/FC2/FC3? You just assume it is right since ED say so, But if you fly and try to employ tactics you find your self in very frustrating situation when everyone know that 90% of Soviet missile miss, go 10m and pop some flares and you can stay hot whit no fear against Soviet missiles. I would like you to try that in RL, The simulator result in how good you are in exploiting instead of using tactics. Vietnam SAMS had better tracking then ER-27:)

Agree 100%

What makes you think that ED have more intel on ER/ET-27 tracking now compere to FC1/FC2/FC3?

Cap'n kamikaze, The problem is now that you don't get a realistic representation of RL, because pilots have intelligence about how good missiles are and take risks accordingly compare to RL. This need to bee looked at by ED in order to bring back the tactical aspect of DCS. I would assume that modern air combat community were happier whit how missiles tracked in FC1/FC2/FC3, And there is no prove that missiles was less realistic then. Fly paths of missiles have changed to the better, but reducing tracking to this extend compare to before makes me wonder about what intel :) I would like to argue that late FC3 to DCS 1.5.3 missiles tracking made DCS modern air to air community much more war thunder like on MP servers.

Su-27S compare to F-15C have (telekodavoju informacuju) data link. That is what makes Su-27 agreat flanker whit EOS. I guise ED is working on it, since it is working in singelplayer.

Trust me 51st know how to adapt to new tactics, the question is not about that rather then that the simulation alows way to mutch risk at the moment.

Blaze, what was wrong whit Blinking jammers, it was more alive and felt more real to me compare to now. Nothing makes jammers more RL in DCS1.5.3 It was removed only becouse it broke TWS lock :) funny that IA blink jammers now thou:) I hope ED get it sorted soon, It has been a long wait. Modern Air Combat Need to find a fundation. We need some love ED.

We all adjust and fly by simulations limits, I dont blame any fighter pilot for his way of flying. It is EDs jobb to find the settings that brings a more realistic representation and behavier from fighter pilots. ED are doing grate in that respect where missiles fly paths feel more alive and realistic.

Have I mentioned balance ? I talk about people exploit bad tracking of missiles that leads to unrealistic behavior on MP servers. I have no proof how good missiles should track. But if ED had some intel to set the missiles in FC1/FC2/FC3. In those versions missiles had better tracking witch in my opinion leads to more realistic MP environment. Because pilots need to take popper action and not do some straight in flying in to ET/ER whit no fear because you have countermeasures.

PLZ ED Make MP community respect ER/ET lunches, it is not realistic at all when people exploit bad tracking of ER-27 and ET-27. You have to understand that DCS pilots evade way more missiles then RL pilots. So we take bigger risk because DCS gives way to big reward at the moment when you do that. There is no evidence that tracking of missiles was less realistic in FC1/FC2/FC3 compare to DCS 1.5.3. Tracking needs to be set to a respectable value. It is not funny.

Same, no problem whit trim rather then when going autopilot off. If you don't use FFB joystick you need to find autopilots trim setting/position on your stick in order to have smoth transition.

YoYo, Since our stick is centered when we go autopilot off we need to find the position of the trim. Could it be possible to have a option to save the trim setting for us who don't use FFB sticks?

LN are doing outstanding job on MIG-21, I will for sure get their future products. Keep up the good work and plz make some more Soviet aircraft ;)