Jump to content

LuSi_6

Members
  • Posts

    430
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LuSi_6

  1. just to be clear, same bug as posted some time ago
  2. I can't geht any of the campaigns to work. After each Mission I get an error message but I can continue. BUT mission results are only updated after the first mission. So I get stuck always in the second Mission. Pleased Help! Thx
  3. Das Hauptproblem aus meiner Sicht sind drei Dinge: 1) das Messen mit zweierlei Maß, siehe MiG-19 release. Jemand befand das für nicht ausreichend und der release verschob sich ewig. Aber dann die F-16 so raushauen passt nicht zusammen. 2) Der F-14B early access hatte einfach eine Qualität die viele nun schmerzlich vermissen... 3) Multiplayer: Multiplayer ist, obwohl seitens ED sehr vernachlässigt, der Kern der DCS comm. Und hier hat ED einfach auch alle nicht F-16 besitzter vor den Kopf gestoßen. Fast alle populären Server sind auf open-beta, und da fliegt nun die Viper lustig rum, ohne IFF und unzerstörbar. Das versaut allen (!) Teilnehmern das Spielerlebnis (Sorry: Simulationserlebnis). Fehlendes IFF hat zu Frust beim M2k release geführt, fehlendes IFF hat beim Hornet release zu chaos geführt, und nun wieder --> nichts gelernt! Zumindest basic IFF ala FC3 hätte für den Anfang gereicht, realistisches IFF nachgereicht. Und ohne Schadensmodel hätte die F-16 auf keinen Server gedurft. --------------------- kein Mensch stört sich wirklich an fehlenden Lichtern oder WIP Texturen, aber das summiert sich eben auf. IFF und Schadensmodel, das ist es was die Viper als pre-alpha erscheinen lassen. Egal wie die updates nun kommen, ED hat viel verspielt hier.
  4. I get this bug. I can click it away, I can play next Mission and destroyed Ground Targets are saved, shot down A/C not so much… it happens when the CMD window after a Mission should open. happens in all campaigns, fresh install, 11.05 script Version (did it via the zip file and copy&past) any suggestions?
  5. seems quite good by now with the -19
  6. it's a script, just like every other script. It's part of the Mission. You as a Player have to do Nothing :) for SRS: stuff like line-of-sight and so on is not enabled, that would give us a nice extra touch ;)
  7. here we go: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=158076&highlight=EWRS+script :):joystick: €dit: SRS seems to be not fully configured, see attachment
  8. use the EWRS script, you still have non voice GCI via F10 Option with that, but it should motivate to use comms :)
  9. I think it's the nature of the missions: it's much more easy here to figure out what to do, and people use the Server as a kind of easy Team death match enviroment (inlcuding myself). The constant AWACS will always lead you to your next contact, there is almost no need to do comms at all except for calling bogey dope every 0.1sec This is very different on DDCS or Blueflag, that's why People go on SRS + the missing dynamic results are less motivating to plan and coordinate. I like the Server for what it is, a quick team death match without that BVR Fox3 nonsense :)
  10. SRS is really nice if you're in a plane with a decent radio. When you're in a MiG-15, you're super alone in comms. Not sure about the MiG-19, but I from what I saw, it's more close to the -15 than to the -21. (and the same for the Sabre on blue side)
  11. That's not what I meant when I said you should force people to use SRS ;)
  12. +1 you actually can land the MiG now at slower speeds, super easy in VR to land now. In most conditions, I land purely visual, not checking the instruments. For non-VR users: just check your decent rate, you need to treat her like a girl, very gentle.
  13. Hi, wie in der PM versprochen, EWRS Script demo Mission :pilotfly: skript test.miz
  14. Out of interest: how much does it take to keep a server like this running? Besides from the $ issue, did you think of using the EWR skript instead of the AWACS? Or use both, so I can tune away from 20 people calling at the same time... :) And a request: enforce players to be on SRS like the DDCS server. SRS is always super quite. A shame...
  15. please leave out the Viggen. It has no real place in that scenario. No, they tried, but no one ever bought one besides the Swedish themselves.
  16. well, the MiG-19 is fully independent from the M2k or the Harrier. It's a different team. Rearding the Harrier: it's getting small but constant updates if you follow the Razbam Facebook page. I bought (almost) all modules, and honestly, Belsimtec is much worse in terms of progress. There's no love for the Huey, the MiG-15 or the F-5. Even the instant action missions used to feel like a 2min mission editing (ok, they improved here a lot). Even worse is ML3 with the MiG-21, that's constantly broken in one way or another. I'll get the MiG-19 as soon as it's out and the MiG-23 that follows the -19.
  17. I think we need more Shilkas and Vulcans all over the battlefield area, and remove the "air quake" zones: Create one battlefield area where opposing ground forces meet -or- a single sided objective like: 1. mission red strike - blue defend 2. blue counter strike - red defence something like this. would be much more interesting if we don't have mirrored objectives. In addition, focus on one strike area, we we can actually find each other even without our limited radars (this a more a gameplay request) Other than that: I can only connect via IP, in the server list I have a Ping >500, ingame it's max. 110... But anyway, good fun server!
  18. Hi, could you update the first post with the new rules? It's not convenient to search through 70+ pages here. Thx!
  19. awsome! How could I miss that? But please: update the first post so we don't need to scroll all pages :) Q1: do you sell samples right now? Q2: do you ship to Europe? Q3: regarding Vive issues: do you ship the Oculus version anyway? Thx!
×
×
  • Create New...