LuSi_6

I'm on a buisness trip right now, so I can't test it. Could someone test the results if you dive lower than your target so that seeker and radar are looking away from the ground?

you turn to the side the target is turning or the opposite side first?

so in this case the currend RWR works fine! :thumbup: we get STT warning (and no SARH launch warning) we get SAM launch warning we get active ARH warning besides hard to read symbology I'm fine now with the RWR :)

thx. this is brilliant!

interesting question: does the Radar change something between lock (STT) and firering a SARH? be it the M2k, SU or Eagle? launching the AIM 120 should give you no warning in any RWR, so that is correct

so by now all great musicians die, leaving us alone with disney channel pseudo stars. sad story. RIP

check their web page http://www.aircombatgroup.co.uk/

Vive should be supported, but it will be even more expensive. Do you need a lighthouse tracking while sitting in you chair for flying? I guess no. I will get whatever device has the better screen (after prices go down once vive is released. Maybe next xmas

yes, but when I lock a target I would like my Radar to keep the lock and not to loose lock as soon as the pilot of the target plane touches his stick...

You get a audio warning if a SAM was launched at you, against air borne targets you just get a audio that you have been locked

so I'm not the only one. This makes the use of the 530 even harder :(

Bonjour! I ran into some Radar problems once and a while, to name it: I loose lock (STT) on my target as soon as the targed dives and turn ( =notching?) Now I only used Radar for A2A in FC3 before and the Eagles and Flankers and MiGs do have a solid lock and it's kind of hard work to brake the lock. Not so the M2k Radar :huh: So my question: #do I use wrong Radar settings? I let all to default, just set Radar to EM #is the RDI Radar to sensetive (and related to that: are the FC3 Radars to good or not as simulated as the full scale DCS Radars like MiG-21, M2k?) #looking at the F-14s AWG-9, even that Radar has some trouble with terrain and low flying targets as it was build to target bomber over open seas -> Mirage Radar is optimised for high altidude head on interception and kind of lacks low alt small target tracking? Thanks :pilotfly:

no need to rescue pilots that dissapointed the great leader \sarcasm

don't like it, don't use it. Easy, isn't it?

neue Ordnerstruktur für Cockpit texturen. Für die probleme mit den custom skins, wende dich an den Ersteller. Die orginal skins funktionieren 1a

that is not enterly true. You "feel" sounds, meaning the body, not only the ears can add information to the brain. Also the hairs inside the ear behind the drum can get stimulated from sounds coming from the opposite side. The brain can locate the source of sound in a natural 3D enviroment without turning the head (not for all frequences!)

NTTR critics (that even get deleted here) is morstly because all airfields we have now(!) are so close all around the center. ED should have spend their time on maken more Airfileds instead of placing a million easter eggs all aroud the map. And no, it's not about RU attacking the US on US soil, it's the posibilities outside of red flag that are very limited. Take the (user made) guardians of the caucasus dynamic campaign, it fits so perfectly to the caucasus map. You just can't do this on the Navada map with currend airfields. A closed scenario (we hopefully get "someday", like WWII) would offer so much more than sandboxing all day long, esp for MP gameplay. But then, all you hear is "it's up to the mission maker"... how many servers do we have with a closed scenario? Basicly all we have is FC3 free for all deathmath aka 104th and only god knows what will happen if you try to do a 80's or 90's scenario with no AIM-120. Shitstorm and empty servers. ED should focus on rounding up the DCS:W contend and group equipment to at least decades-> I create a mission, I select "80's" and all units past 1990 will not be avaible and so on. Nobody needs smal restaurands modeled in the middle of the desert

+1 for Ardennes +1 for Deseert Storm Iraq/Kuwait/Iran map +1 for Normandy, there was lots of action in preparation of D-Day, so why not. A german fighterplane feels very much at home in France :lol: -1 for "unluky" Airfield choices of NTTR -100 for Humuz. Pointless and first ED product I will not buy

doens't the USAF consider everything past 5nm to be BVR? The document about it is even somewhere here in the forum

five ugly planes in one picture. not bad

yes. Orginal ones are a big mess on the Rift

at one point in history, there where more MiG-21 than all NATO jets alltogether. And a non AIM-120 Eagle could only engage one target at a time. As for short range, well everything in west germany was well in range for the MiG-21. Don't forget, Cold War means shitty AIM-7 and F-16A over Europe. Something the Reds could handle

I was hoping that me and other DK2 owners who funded and helped oculus don't need to pay the full price. Anyway price for germany is bad joke. No buy for me

very well done! much better textures!