Jump to content

RAZBAM_ELMO

Members
  • Posts

    2093
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by RAZBAM_ELMO

  1. Fixed in latest patch. MarkinG as RESOLVED and moving to RESOLVED.
  2. Can you walk me through what you're doing to get it in the ME? How many waypoints are you setting? Are you making the aircraft client or player and not AI? Be very specific.
  3. I'll have to have the FM Dev take a deeper dive but that wont happen until mid January. In all honesty, why would you willingly continue to accelerate beyond m.95? Like if you keep accelerating and know that you're going to rip the wings......why continue? Just cut the throttle and turn outbound. Im confused.
  4. Known issue, waiting on ED to help us out there. In the mean time you should have brake pressure built up already so just make sure to remove chocks before you start. Eventually you will have 0 pressure and will remove the chocks when brake pressure has built up.
  5. As a fix short term could not be found, and due to it being an odd bug that happens under very certain circumstances its being put on the back burner. Logically you would not be hauling 10 GBUs into combat, even on a MP server it hampers you more than is effective.
  6. I was able to get all hits with 10 bombs GBUall hitsTOO.trk
  7. The logic and symbology for the LARs right now is a stand in until we can create an elliptical zone. As for any other issues im struggling to see what the bug here is. If that cannot be identified then Ill move it to resolved.
  8. Marking as USER ERROR and moving to RESOLVED
  9. AFC is operating as intended and has been checked by the SME. Marking AS INTENDED and moving to RESOLVED. To note, any further posts referencing the AFC not functioning correctly with be deleted immediately unless an ACTUAL bug exists with the system causing a CTD or other catastrophic issue
  10. Confirmed by SME, box should enlarge when slewed but be over the area which its looking. Marking REPORTED
  11. After numerous tests and running through with CB testers, bug is not present and cannot replicate. I believe this may be a USER ERROR and movbing to RESOLVED. Should you have further issues please reach out to me directly on thr forums or on discord and we can run through this together 1 on 1.
  12. Trust me, I watched the video, i attempted the same parameters you did. Our FM dev looked into all of the parameters and the SME even had a go but no adjustments to the FM would correct the behaviour. So as I mentioned before, while you Can go supersonic, theres quite a few warning signs that should prevent you front continuing past M1.0, in any mission I dont even let the jet get up past .95.
  13. The way sidearms and sidewinders for in DCS is a little funky unfortunately, so the sidearms wont work well inless the IR cool is on and the sidewinders need to be pre cooled to be fired or get a better lock.
  14. Harrier never used G MAVs. Marking AS INTENDED and moving to RESOLVED
  15. Bug is no longer present from last update. Marking as RESOLVED and moving to RESOLVED.
  16. No bug found. Just because you can does not mean you should. Plenty of indicators telling you not to go that fast. Marking AS INTENDED and moving to RESOLVED
  17. Holy crap, people still complaining in here and not adding constructive criticism still?
  18. Youve got them all correct. I made sure they are as simple to understand and interpret as possible. If a large majority are confused I can change it but for now everyone seems to comprehend and interpret their meanings.
  19. Seen, Ill have the SME check this and see if it needs to be reduced or if its accurate.
  20. Marking as USER ERROR and moving to RESOLVED
  21. AFAIK issue is resolved as of last patch. Marking as RESOLVED and moving to RESOLVED
  22. Working as of last update. Marking RESOLVED and moving to RESOLVED
  23. Issued addressed in previous update. Marking RESOLVED and moving to RESOLVED.
  24. In todays latest OB update is this bug still an issue? If so i need a new .trk please.
  25. After todays update can you re test and give a new.trk if that problem persists? Glad to know everything else works for you.
×
×
  • Create New...