Jump to content

felixx75

Members
  • Posts

    831
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by felixx75

  1. ...which nevertheless does not change the fact that legal cases simply take time. And that is what is meant by it does not happen quickly.
  2. I dare to doubt that...
  3. You even gave yourself the answer, so why not just stick to it?
  4. As soon as there is something official to say (and no rumors or the like), you will be able to read it in the first post of this thread.
  5. Do you have any serious evidence or sources for your claims? (surely not) Or are you just expressing your subjective dislike of Razbam? (most likely)
  6. Definitely and immediately (assuming it's a module that interests me).
  7. So the English manual has been proofread for more than a year? --> https://forum.dcs.world/topic/340168-mi-24p-manual/#findComment-5368718
  8. Cool, so you have a solution without knowing the problem? You should play the lottery, because you surely know the numbers before the lottery...
  9. Since you (just like all of us) have no idea what the actual problem is, your suggestion makes no sense.
  10. Did you seriously expect anything else here?
  11. And that's exactly it, you're “guessing”. Until we hear the reasons from ED, everything else is pure speculation that is of no use to anyone. I don't think you should throw wild guesses into the room.
  12. Is it true that the Hind has been withdrawn from sale on the Russian store page?
  13. I have already written it above. Of course you can wish for it, but I don't think it would be worth it for ED, so I wouldn't hope for it. Right, I wouldn't have to buy it and I wouldn't buy it, just like an F-16D or an F-18D. Trainers in DCS have little real purpose other than immersion sitting in the same airplane with "students". That's perfectly ok, but it certainly only affects a relatively small group of DCS players. One module where this works very well is the Mirage F1, as the trainer is included there. But if I had to pay extra for the "B" version, for example, I wouldn't buy it. As I said, wish for an F-15D, because that's what the Wishlist is for, but I don't believe it will be realized. Edit If ED does develop a FF F-15D, it would probably be a full price module, as it would be a completely new module...
  14. An upgrade? You're probably looking at around 20$. I don't think that would be worth it for ED. But you can wish for it. Why buy an F-15D when we have an F-15E and will have an FF F-15C (and already have an FC F-15C). In my opinion, this whole trainer thing is more for “role-players” (and that's absolutely ok and not meant in a derogatory way) than something like this is really necessary in DCS.
  15. It seems that it is currently not possible to change the laser code of a GBU-54 in the A-10C II. The corresponding box is missing in the rearm/refuel window and in contrast to the AV8, for example, you cannot change any codes in the kneeboard of the A-10C (unless I have overlooked it). GBU-12 with Laser Code window GBU-54 without the Laser Code Window
  16. I don't think I really understand what your problem is. However, I have absolutely no problem with the HMD. Neither in the F-18, nor in the F-16 (I also use TrackIr).
  17. It's not impossible. On the contrary, it works (for me) without any problems and is very easy to use.
  18. Interestingly, I don't really have any problems maintaining altitude with the autopilot... I also don't trim much beforehand. ...and that remains to be seen, as nothing is certain (neither in one direction nor the other). But that's a topic for another thread.
  19. You've written that three times now, but why before June?
  20. But only if it were possible to operate without our own radar. A radar contact at the RWR can be seen despite a low rcs.
×
×
  • Create New...