Jump to content

felixx75

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    831

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by felixx75

  1. felixx75
    Thank you for your answer. That's basically all I wanted to hear. So far it's just been “nobody knows”. That was of course not very satisfactory. But now I know more that it seems to be really difficult. So thank you very much and I'm sorry if I sounded a little indignant.
  2. felixx75
    Somehow you all must enjoy blaming each other and chewing over the same conjectures, assumptions and speculations over and over again without coming up with anything even slightly useful or informative... Since there are no official statements about what exactly the problem is, any speculation about it is simply a waste of time (and no, any statements from any people in any Discord channels don't count).
  3. felixx75
    Thank you very much for your help. It's almost funny that even in the Heatblur Discord, the Heatblur team themselves don't know how to...
  4. felixx75
    How can it be that no one can give an answer to this? As long as the bomb has not yet left the plane, and that is the case when I select the fuze option, that is Heatblur's responsibility. What happens after the weapon is dropped is, of course, ED's territory.
  5. felixx75
    Hi, in the rearm & refuel menu for CBU's you can select a fuze time and/or a fuze height. I assume in the airplane I select one or the other option via the nose/tail arming switch. But which setting applies to which option?
  6. felixx75
    How can it be that the Mi-24 still doesn't have a proper manual after around 4 years? And no, the excellent Chuck's Guide doesn't count. I find that rather unsatisfactory.
  7. felixx75
    I don't see it that way. The newer F-15C certainly sells better in the long term than a single old F-15, so the expression “short terms return” is wrong. I also don't see that a large part of the DCS community would “break away” because of this, why should they? The possibilities that you have in the editor to create interesting scenarios are very large and it is up to the mission designer to create realistic and interesting missions (and that is definitely possible). Btw., we would now be having a discussion here about how much better a more modern F-15C would be if ED had announced an old F-15C (perhaps with different people, but the discussion would still exist). You always want what you don't have.
  8. felixx75
    Obviously the answer is no. As always, we want what we don't get and are never satisfied with what we get, every time, with every new module.
  9. felixx75
    Ich denke, Dir ist nicht wirklich bewußt, worum es den Leuten mit den Bedenken tatsächlich geht. Jedem ist bewußt, dass DCS nicht zu 100% ein reales Kampfflugzeug nachbilden kann. Aber es macht einen Unterschied, ob zu einem bestimmten Muster alle möglichen Daten offiziell verfügbar und bekannt sind, um eben möglichst nahe am Original bleiben zu können, oder ob man sich eben auf Videos von Flugvorführungen u.ä. stützt. Die DCS F-35 wird mit Sicherheit nicht denselben Stand erreichen können, wie z.B. die DCS F-4E, da schlicht die offiziellen Daten fehlen, die man eben bei einer F-4 hat. Am Ende wird sicher eine F-35 dabei rauskommen, die Spaß macht und sich wie blöd verkaufen wird, aber eben mit dem Wissen, dass es, was die Simulation anbelangt, sicher keine F-4 ist und das mag den ein oder anderen stören und darf das auch.
  10. felixx75
    The F-15C once again shows how it always is with newly announced modules. You always want exactly what you don't get. If ED had announced an F-15A, there would be a thread saying that a new or newer F-15C would be much better, etc... It's always funny to read Actually, all these points are pretty irrelevant for DCS as a game... The fact that there would be no corresponding opponents would only be relevant in PvP, if at all. In all other scenarios, it's up to the mission builder to create interesting battles. Or did the USA complain that Iraq had no proper counterparts...
  11. felixx75
    That was the problem, I had still chosen missiles. The master arm switch has no influence on the display of the flight path marker. Many thanks for the quick help
  12. felixx75
    Das habe ich jetzt schon ein paar Mal gelesen. Ich verstehe ehrlich gesagt nicht, was man an diesem Muster für DCS so toll finden kann Der ganze Missionsverlauf ist vorher geplant, man hat 2 LGB's dabei und das wars. Das muß doch schlicht langweilig sein? Das macht man 5 oder 6 mal und dann ist doch die Luft raus.
  13. felixx75
    After a long time away from F1, I've started flying F1 again. But somehow the flightpath marker is not displayed in aproach mode. Has something changed or is this a bug?
  14. felixx75
    For me, an F-15C is simply not a replacement for an F-15E. A supplement, but absolutely no replacement.
  15. felixx75
    ...and you read that from what exactly? Can it be, yes of course. Do we know, clearly no. As always, it's all speculation.
  16. felixx75
    Modern fighters like an F-35 are designed to take as much as possible off the pilot's shoulders to reduce his workload. In terms of flying, this borders on boredom. Older models are far more interesting for me. I don't just have to fly into the vicinity and drop a JDAM or similar, I have to do something for success. Since the Eurofighter is already too modern for me, I probably won't buy the F-35.
  17. felixx75
    Then we have to wait for ED, as that is their job.
  18. felixx75
    I, for example, already have the Mig-21bis (which I hardly ever fly). So I wouldn't buy another variant of the Mig-21. There are enough other alternatives that are not yet represented in any variant in DCS. But that may also be because I generally have little to no interest in Soviet/Russian fighters.
  19. felixx75
    https://youtu.be/vhIj_udzGUY?si=z-yOxqH7rrxjtlCe
  20. felixx75
    Last Update: Nov 08, 2023...
  21. felixx75
    At least in your opinion...
  22. felixx75
    Did you expect something else? ...because you have no information about the case. This thread consists almost entirely of conjecture and assumptions.
  23. felixx75
    If you quote me, please do so correctly. I wrote that I would not buy an F-111B but would buy an F-111D immediately (or an F).
  24. felixx75
    I don't think so... Maybe end of 2025
  25. felixx75
    https://youtu.be/2u2yLEM1iHM?si=sq834BySyfAaOrgA
×
×
  • Create New...