The_GOZR

Tried all The F16 stick which is great for F16 and the rest well sorry man but it is not good feeling at all with the mod with more cash it could be the best so far but sorry to offend you and The Cougar is bad from stock period.. or maybe i should say that it is not at all of my liking.. Now did you see how much he want to spend? not much so THINK.. a more nimble stick with pedals and a used throttle would do him much more good than just one expensive stick that he would have to mod

Not using the cockpit or track ir i see..

Agree Cougar have a great finish i mean feel strong but that about it.. than spend some good cash to mod it to what it would be good 400 500 $ later as for now stock Cougar are POS.

http://www.chproducts.com/retail/joysticks.html http://www.chproducts.com/retail/pedals.html If you go to the big stores you'll find those much cheaper than the prices showed An example here http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826169102&Tpk=ch%2bfighter%2bstick

Hate Cougar with passion.. you need to mod as much as you can of those sticks.. go with Ch stick Fighter and the Pedals get an used X52 and get the throttle only.

the parts that i'm selling for example just kill anything you want from AMD for cheap.. E6700 DS3 GX2 http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=28395

Yeni seriously i was AMD but now the low end intel kill the higest AMD. AMD suffer while running lockon and FSX well FSX is out of question actuyally very poor performance. mostly if Lockon is running on one cpu AMD is definitly out of question.

AMD .. forget about it for now. Dual CPU is great.. when lockon is running on one CPU many other background calculs and services are running on the second cpu this make a great free up cpu to work on Lockon.. ;) going single is just a no go. Look at this, more power than any AMD can give for not much... http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=28395

E6700 + Gygabite DS3 965P mobo + 7950 GX2 1 GB 390 $ PM me BTW the GX2 is faster than the 8800 GTS and GT (92) at FSX BY FARRR, also Lockon and IL2 ;) http://www.gozr.net/iocl/viewtopic.php?t=3634

LOL.. it remind me of Gliders pit that way :D

Max and MAD since i have been almost banned the last time i posted in english in the Russian corner .. In English please and if you need a translator i can post a link if you want..

Actually yes that is correct the result is good. I was hoping for a fix inside lockon but this can do the trick , I will look into it more in details from inside LC. I think many guys will have to do this for now and should be on a sticky somewhere. But here the problem that you will encounter by doing this ( 208 FOV view.lua) all sensitivity of your track ir will be "shifted" so you will have to built a profile specific to lockon only. Like me i used one for all FSX F4 Condor lockon il2 stryke fighters etc.. They used to all share the same profile so you have just to remember to switch it back. Thx Iron If you dont turn off one side of the Z axis of track IR like in the above picture this will look like this

No to glorified pacman boxes.. Rather go with Falcon 4... ;)

No i mean they should be the same the view is my far or flying view "112" ( in the MiG ) and i cannot find the track IR center point view angle value, I understand that the track ir z axis have a center point and this center point is something like "60" that way the z axis allow the trackir user to go back and forward on that axis now what i'm trying to find is set the center point of the Z axis same as the far out FOV that would be 112 for me. Meaning i wouldn't have a back movement but only a forward movement from 112 to 20 Do i make sens ? Thx

This doen't fix the track ir re-center view to original set ( wide on this case or at list to a specific FOV ) with zoom enabled. example -- Camera view angle limits {view angle min, view angle max}. CameraViewAngleLimits = {} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iSu_27] = {20.0, 115.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iSu_33] = {20.0, 115.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iSu_25] = {20.0, 109.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iSu_39] = {20.0, 121.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iMiG_29] = {20.0, 112.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iMiG_29K] = {20.0, 112.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iA_10] = {20.0, 97.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iF_15] = {20.0, 107.0} Example for Mig29 in snapviews.lua Snap[5][13]["viewAngle"] = 112.0 Snap[5][13]["vAngle"] = -9 Snap[5][13]["hAngle"] = 0

If you are lucky you may have an entire good answer not enygmatic lines ;) LOL..

Major problem I still didn't find the solution.

Becareful back up your files

Lc never ever crashed on me. Duo core here.

What i would like to know is.. how is it possible to have a sim and make only one patch for it.. Seulement one pregunta...

Will be added into the game model An-12B http://babelfish.altavista.com/ This will help you desna.

:(

http://www.gozr.net/iocl/viewtopic.php?t=3705 I "fixed" it on my side. . . .

The remake.

http://www.gozr.net/iocl/viewtopic.php?p=27897#27897 My focus is just to inspirer others .. always did.