Jump to content

amalahama

Members
  • Posts

    1811
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by amalahama

  1. Radar is not complete, I still find AA modes irregular and buggy sometimes, compared with DCS F-18. Also, datalink is unreallistically overpowerful at the moment
  2. Thank you Santi. Any word on when it will be available? It's an important feature and it was already developed for the warthog. Thanks
  3. The Jeff is a J-10 with an English cockpit mod Jokes aside, it would be nice to see the J-10 as part of CAP at least
  4. Why is not this thread closed already? Poll was completed, results are pretty illustrative, there is no need for further discussion, if ED implements a monthly payment model they will bankrupt because large parts of their player base will go away. Period
  5. I wouldn't use the harrier as benchmark...
  6. Flagrum, thanks for the example, I think the bug is pretty clear now for the devs to check. In A-10C it works properly
  7. Have you reported it in the bug section?
  8. C'mon, the J15 is not more than a revamped SU33. I expect more common types in the PLAAF such as JH7, J10 or Shaanxi transports
  9. I'm curious to see that China asset pack is getting populated with ground and sea units, but there is a relevant lack on air assets (J10, JH7 and other transport/SIGINT platforms) Will we see some love to air units any time soon?
  10. That's a pity. We would have to content with the joke we have now
  11. Hi, Last ED newspaper left me wary... not only the specific paragraph about the Harrier is suspicious, apparently ED has updated AV-8B shop page with new screenshots, including what it looks like Tarawa integration with Super Carrier API. That let me wonder if ED is maybe lending a hand to RB for bringing the Harrier to an acceptable quality and maturity level, more in line with what a DCS-stamped title should have. If true, it would be wonderful news and I hope to see the results very soon!
  12. More than 80% of the DCS community rejected your proposal. You tried and you failed. Just leave it with dignity. You are making yourself a fool now
  13. Shall we open a bug report then?
  14. Thanks. Is a bug or a feature?
  15. Hi Uboat, thank you for your attention. You are referring to the circle with the "1" enclosed definitely, however the FPM is just the element above it As you can see in my first picture, the delta between the FPM and the horizon line in the AA scope is not correct when aircraft flies inverted or at high bank angles. Worth mentioning that in horizontal flight, the representation is just fine.
  16. A bit OT, but, don't you find MAVF resolution too high? In DCS A-10C, it looked more realistic somewhat
  17. I tried today and looked like HARMs are still lofting in TOO mode. I think this behaviour changed some patches ago, because lofting is only possible with range information is available (PB mode)
  18. Hi, When flying inverted, the FPM shown in the AA radar screen shows an erratic beahaviour and foul indication
  19. Try to tap the screen
  20. Just a reminder: paying monthly doesn't mean you will get all the bugs fixed sooner. Example: Star Citizen
  21. So all razbam developers passed through 5-year-long personal issues that don't impeded them to release new 70$ modules but somehow it impacts their capability to fix bugs and finish features. I see...
  22. Can you show those references please? Thanks
  23. Hey MOHAB, Vertigo72, if you are so willing to pay mothly I can pass you my bank account so everybody's happy :D
  24. Dunno, but if they do, definitively it'd be like this!
  25. So because you didn't like the result of the previous poll, you make a new one this time omitting the winner - keep things as it is today. Very northkore-ish
×
×
  • Create New...