amalahama

Yes, but youtube videos featuring JF-17 RL flight sims said wrong. Moreover, barometric altimeters don't provide such accuracy, specially at high altitudes

It's a personal opinion, but I think it would be way more interesting a F-117 sim with "relaxed realism" out of the DCS ecosystem, where some licenses are taken. Think of a "Microprose F-117 3.0"

At least A-A mode are still missing.

I'm sorry, but LD-10 mechanics just don't make sense for a modern ARM: - None of the modes allows you to choose the target that the missile will track - Pilot have zero control on the final target acquired and destroyed - a real friendly-fire problem - Not even possible to stablish radar filters, to priorize the radar signals to attack. - I don't undertand SP mode, how does the missile know which emissor locked your aircraft? what happen when several RWR contacts have a lock on you at the same time? Plus, LD-10 have an incredible accuracy even when radar emissor switch off the radar mid-course. This might be OK for ACT mode (since you shoot to a specific geographical location) but shouldn't be in other modes PAS and SP.

Why? Too cumbersome to maintain?

It looks weird that compass and coordinates can't be shown, since it's synthetically produced in the pod and injected into Hornet's screen as TV signal, it doesn't have anything to do with Hornet MC OFP

Probably it's because drawing a triangle it's an exceptional programming challenge, according to razbam

Let's make a big fuzz on changes that nobody cares about, so maybe customer base forgets the relevant, gameplay breaking and probably more difficult to fix bugs that they are continously reporting. RAZBAM logic

That's so true. However, it seems that all sensors in DCS world are unrealistically perfect.

Oh it is for propelling the bomb forward

I don't think that would be a problem - F-35 features already several AAA games and Hollywood hits

I think that's the intended behaviour. I remember having seen one post discussing this

Hi! I'm looking for a nice complete book about the Panavia tornado: history, development, technical features and operational experiences There isnt many books about the aircraft to begin with, so my hopes are low, but I'm a true lover and it's worth to try Best regards

That's because BMS AG Radar is unrealistically optimistic

Thanks uboats. That the community pays attention to such secondary features is the result of a extremely well polished module, good job!

It provides a range estimation, since SPJ is able to measure not only azimuth but only emitter elevation. It has errors though, specially over hilly terrains and on AA targets.

Hi, It looks like P.U (Position Update) UFC menu is incomplete, isn't it?

Physx is soooo 2005-ish. Do you guys remember the stand-alone acceleration card they put on sale? It was a disaster business-wise

Fair enough, I think it's up to RagnarDa to clarify

Don't worry, you will be able to pay 70$ for another unfinished early access module from ED soon.

I don't understand, it works fine in the Ka-50, it shows the elevation lines...

My feelings share with many in this community is that we have more modules than we can master in years, however we would pay to third parties providing a proper "context" to use them (e.g. terrain and AI assers). This is a business still to be explored

It will come eventually - in the meantime there are so many basic features that needs attention so badly!

Yeah, OFLY position update looks like the clumsiest way to update your INS, I don't understand why there is no a Radar or HUD INS update mode. It seems there is something missing in the functionality