Jump to content

amalahama

Members
  • Posts

    1802
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by amalahama

  1. Nice substantial report! Unfortunately the AUTO mechanics are not trivial and therefore I expect ED to take their time to model it properly
  2. Currently TWS AUTO centers the scan to L&S target. In reality it should center on the centroid of the established track files. I can provide evidence via PM if needed.
  3. I just want a F/A-18C++ Object Oriented Hornet
  4. It would be nice to guide SLAM-ER or any other MITL weapon from a diferent aircraft than the original vector. This capability is very real and profusely used in recent conflicts.
  5. Hi @Vibora Do you plan to bring the ex-qatar F1EQA (the ones acquired by the EdA in 1994) at some point? They had some AG advanced capabilities, like CCIP bombing modes.
  6. I don't really understand the relationship between ccip and GPS availability... It should feed from the AGR or, if not available, the radio altimeter.
  7. Third parties (e.g. Heatblur) have developed in some cases quite complex INS drift simulations. I would expect nothing less from ED.
  8. I agree, it's a fundamental feature of MITL weapons, hopefully ED will implement the needed interfaces soon (JF-17 suffers same problem)
  9. Honestly, ED should drop the AG classification filtering for SAM interceptions and just take into account store RCS regardless the type
  10. What is the peculiarity of this missile compared with the existing Sparrows?
  11. Has the seeker logic changed as well? It's more realistically modelled in the F-16
  12. There quite a bunch of highly expected bugfixes and features to come more important that the Slam-er, if you ask me
  13. Is it possible to disable Link 16 in the mission editor?
  14. Is the Shrike still been considered? And the Walleye I?
  15. As stated, the problem is really evident in large targets such as frigates, HARMS always impact on ship centroid instead of the actual radar emitter.
  16. As the title says, is SAM Multiple engagement capability (in the SA-10 for example) modelled in DCS?
  17. Hi, any news on this? I really love the SA-4 and it would add a nice tactical dimension to current IADS in game
  18. Fantastic post @Fri13 I would add absolute lack of wind correction in CCIP and AUTO modes
  19. Artic scenery anyone?
  20. Unfortunately we have perfectly boresighted Mavs, in comparison with Viper's. We don't have even the option (existing in RL). I would love Mavs in the Hornet gets improved to the level of the Viper's.
  21. Harriers sidearm are the bugged ones, not the HARMS. In general, antiradiation missiles are a denial weapon, it forces enemy forces to turn their radar off, but for destruction you need to use more conventional means, since ARM pk is in general quite poor
  22. No you can't. You operate pretty much of your sensors through the large TADS display only available in Copilot's cockpit
  23. Welcome to real life buddy!
×
×
  • Create New...