Jump to content

BaconSarnie

Members
  • Posts

    398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BaconSarnie

  1. Verified, I went there and got same
  2. Didnt someone start an A4 but have to cancel it due to Boeing not allowing them access to the data and other such problems?
  3. No worries
  4. No longer needed
  5. Not putting in for either myself, I think this an excellent way to give back to the community. I just hope they go to someone who genuinely needs and cant afford them. Not someone with a top end system with top end peripherals. Rep incomming to CCCC
  6. Rep incoming for your hardwork
  7. The flying barell, nah I stand by what I said lol
  8. Nor is the J29 They got it together for the Lansen (which reminds me somewhat of the Hawker Hunter) and all afterwards pretty much though
  9. Meh, he made the statement and should have feasted on socky goodness already, no matter how close the arrival of the 2000 is
  10. I think the answer will be "Soon™"
  11. They were just so ugly though, unlike their aircraft, well the Draken onwards, before that there were a fair few uggos.
  12. He made this post 4 months ago, I would assume the forum staff would have recieved notification from someone of its existance in that time. As its still here I would once more assume that it is allowable. However I could be wrong.
  13. Many of us already have a love for their aircraft, their cars on the other hand.......
  14. Can you not set something on your joystick to act as rudder? I have an x52 which twists for the rudder but it also has 2 rotaries on the throttle, I have in the Mi8 and Huey set one of the rotaries to act as rudder so I can twist the dial and leave it where I want.
  15. I know its not an L39 but you can imagine how bad the inside looked if this is what the canopy looked like
  16. I can fall out with people quite easily lol
  17. Excellent work and that head on pass, wow, close.
  18. Do you have any non standard characters in your DCS username or password? Apparantly the game doesnt like those.
  19. Same, also to BravoYankee4 for his translations and insights
  20. Yup, I wont be bothering The first one was bloody awful enough.
  21. I've said this before so will say it again. There will no doubt be a standalone 2.0 installer. ED cant expect everyone installing it to have come to DCS via 1.2. Some will have it as their first taste of DCS, to to expect new users to download and install 1.2 then have to download updates and install them to convert it to 2.0 isnt logical at all.
  22. Wow, just wow Thanks for the translation.
  23. There will no doubt be a full release version of 2.0 downloadable from DCS site. Not everyone coming to 2.0 will have arrived there via 1.2. New users wont be downloading 1.2 then having to update it to 2.0, stands to reason there will be a full standalone client. There is no harm in deleting 1.2
  24. I unistalled it just after 2.0 launched, we havent used 1.2 for a while, we pretty much moved to 1.5 when that became a lot more stable.
×
×
  • Create New...