-
Posts
1766 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Personal Information
-
Flight Simulators
Player of 40+ combat flight sims since '90s
F-15 Strike Eagle II
ChuckYeager AirCombat
LHX Attack Chopper
TOPGUN: Fire At Will
F-16 Fighting Falcon
Red Baron 3D
iF-22
F-16&MiG-29, novalogic
F/A-18 Hornet 3.0
Flanker 2.0
iF/A-18E Carrier Strike F.
Super EF 2000
Combat FS 3
LockOn: AirCombatSim.
Tomcat Alley
A-10 Cuba
StrikeF. 1,2,NorthAtlant
B-17 flying fortress
DCS Black Shark
Falcon 4.0, Allied, BMS...
Take On Helicop: Hinds
FSX , Aerosoft F-14X
DCS World
... -
Location
Portugal
-
Interests
Jet fighters, pc games, cars
Recent Profile Visitors
32836 profile views
-
Top Jockey started following "Downgraded" Documentation Requirements for modules , DCS F-16C Early Access, what's left, what's next. , DCS MiG-29A and 7 others
-
Hello Furiz, yes unfortunatelly I do have DCS currently uninstalled from my PC as I was forced to format it recently. The reason why I asked, is to have an idea of how certain basic features are in the F-16, before I go through all the hassle of installing / configuring / setting everything again.
-
Can anyone tell if the AIM-9 SPOT / SCAN function in the F-16 is implemented already ? Thank you.
-
Not finding it necessary to open a new thread, regarding the AIM-9 Modes and Functions in the F-16. Sometime has passed, is this solved ? Thank you.
-
F-14 A/B feature follow-up, wish list and beyond
Top Jockey replied to scommander2's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
+ 1 one here. It's one of the reasons why I haven't been buying modules for a good while. This sim is getting too much resource intensive, and therefore highly expen$ive which eventually will cause me moving away. Plus it only adds to the confusion of something that should be gameplay fluid. (I'm also still waiting for the option to remove the duct tape / wire / metal plate from the ACM panel.) -
That being, the AIM-54's line of sight on the rail is not even parallel to the aircraft's ADL. I knew this specific mode of employment was somewhat 'finicky'...
-
There was a thread around here (which I cannot locate right now), where I also posted about that very same issue 1 or 2 years ago. In most of the cases we've come to the conclusion, that the the AIM-54's FOV in that mode is very narrow, and so it is very 'finicky' regarding where your aiming. And there's also the possibility that the AIM-54's FOV is pointing somewhat below the ADL symbol... so you may have more luck pointing at the target with the "aircraft reticle" (pitch and roll symbol) at the HUD... or somewhere between the two symbols.
-
Yep, from the looks of it, I'm not seeing the EF-2000 coming this year either.
-
Agree. Would be outstanding if it really became available this year.
-
Hello, Taking the MiG-29A, its HMS and R-73 combo as example. Does anyone know, how does the R-73 missile seeker head aim / follow the pilot HMS LoS (line of sight) to the target ? I mean, keeping in mind that either the HMS and missile seeker head are both in different spatial positions... their LoS to the target will also be different, so : - does the missile's seeker head aims in a parallel LoS with the HMS ? - or does the missile's seeker head aims in a convergent LoS with the HMS ? If they aim in a convergent LoS with each other (converging on target), then there must be also a distance (range to target) measuring... is this the job of the "OLS" IRST with its laser range-finder ? If this is the case ( IRST laser range measuring ), how does the IRST follows the HMS LoS - parallel or convergent following ? Thank you.
-
@ESAc_flankercobra This is what I was refering to :