Volator

Nope.

Just noticed Dessau airfield has two NDBs (inner/outer) with the same frequency 765.0 KHz. Identifiers are different though, WN for inner and W for outer.

Please see here for further tests:

@BIGNEWY Here are some further test results: These are the settings that I set for my throttle axis for the Virpil CM3 throttle: After setting these values in an instant action mission, I did the same with the F-5E in an instant action and set these values to hit the physical AB detent. See how these values are basically inverted to those I set for the MiG-29: Next, I check the MiG-29 settings again in another instant action mission - and they have been overwritten to the values that I just had set for the F-5E?! Then, after restarting the game, I see these settings for the MiG-29... ... and for the F-5E - they are all gone again. Here's my log file as requested: I also see several .crash files in the logs folder, even though I quit DCS the correct way, there was no crash. Not sure if that means anything? dcs.log

I always took MiG-29A as a colloquial form of NATO lingo Fulcrum-A following how NATO pilots talk about it and would have absolutely no sleepless nights if it stayed that way, but that is just me.

It's this issue:

I am also a non-VR User, and yet it doesn't save.

I configure my Virpil dual throttle as sliders and add a -10 curve to match physical detent with in-game AB detent, but with every restart DCS reverts to the old settings. Axis inversion remains though. This seems to be related to the same issue in the MiG-29

I just found out that the F-5E (FF) is also affected by this... I configured my Virpil dual throttles as sliders in-game and added a -10 curve to make the physical detent match the in-game AB detend, but whenever I restart DCS, these settings are gone.

All the other fighter pilots, the aircraft manuals, the procedures of the fighter-bomber wing I served in, many books and many videos. What kind of fighter pilot told you that?!

Same. Quite annoying bug.

I'm not going down to that level of yours. You don't know much about NATO or aviation.

That's nonsense. If a military or commercial pilot was not able to speak and understand basic aviation English, he wouldn't belong in a cockpit in the first place. Speaking English in aviation is a matter of professionalism. Exactly. The L-39 cockpit was labelled in Russian for all the other Warsaw Pact nations too, not only for Russia, because Russian was the lingua franca for the Warsaw Pact and the only aviation language there.

Because it is a question of standardization. And professionalism, if you will. So again, not weird at all for those who are familiar with professional military or commercial aviation in the west. Military or commercial is not the point. The point is that even in Russia the labels were not changed into local language.