Кош

The problem with virtual cockpit controls is that they don't give sensual feedback like in real life when we flip the switch and feel it click into position. But it can be substituted with sound.

Definitely not possible. Still you can always limit the missiles to K-13. And countermeasure dispensers are part of the loadout and are bolt-on.

This!!! Still, I'd better buy an earlier version that historically fits more conflicts but still would be almost as capable as the bis - S,SM,MF - any '63-69 version with RP-21, ASP, and 5 hardpoints. And RP-21 makes a legitimate guidance for RS-2 and Grom missiles, unlike RP-22 which has a double beam and while being better against ECM cant guide beamriders which require a single beam.

СЕИ(СЕИ-23) stands for Joint Indication System What bothers me is "Strobe Control" ministick on the weapon panel. Is it for Lock On cursor which is on the control stick on the MiG-29? If so its super inconvenient!

Super! Pity Sarmatt has been banned, with his 10 years flying the 21.

Foxbat155 to the rescue. And still we have desired user experience described in pilot manual and pilot's handwritten notebook posted before:https://www.dropbox.com/sh/eyh14uxc89acs4j/AADjYqjE2tokjd7VrRQTaVQXa/Russian?dl=0&subfolder_nav_tracking=1

This is gold, thanks!!! And Georgia seems to be a home for a lot of Su-15s and earlier Su-9 we don't have.

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/eyh14uxc89acs4j/AAA_hvGC0C9A_OyO23mQEMSua?dl=0&preview=MiG-21bis+Manual.pdf courtesy Kobymaru and thread https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=138880

http://www.easternorbat.com/html/soviet_34th_tactical_air_army_.html 176 regiment: MiG-21PF, PFM 1964-1976, MiG-23M 1976-1985 841 regiment Meria/Kobuleti - MiG-21, Su-17 982 regiment Vaziani(Kandahar Afghanistan in the 80s) - MiG-21SM, MiG-23MLA since 1978 https://f-old.a0z.ru/bc/f9/karta6km.JPG https://f-old.a0z.ru/f1/8d/shemaVD1.jpg

http://www.avialogs.com/index.php/en/aircraft/ussr/mikoyangurevitch/mig-21/mig-21bis-pilot-s-flight-operating-instructions.html page 60 and on. Read for yourself guys.

It should not lock on anything. Still it must move into calculated impact point position, using radar distance and to locked target and user-dialed target size for air; radar distance, barometric altitude and pre-set target area altitude above sea level for ground impact point. Which it never did in the module for Air-Air, and ceased to do for Air-Ground. Real manual sight preflight check which cannot be passed in DCS: https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.io/file_download.php?file_id=472&type=bug Edit: Mig-19's ASP-5 had a second display for a second piper that locks onto target, so you have to put the impact point symbol on the target symbol like in a 4th gen fighter, they just had to make a separate display for each symbol back then. For MiG-21 they dropped the idea of cumbersome 2 displays and decided to leave visually invisible targets to guided missiles.

Same here, no gun sounds, external engine is like either from afar or in really good ear protection, and I'm not sure but anyone notice any changes with cockpit switches?

Uh oh... What surprises me is your "hopefully" :) Is there any problem providing your fixes to ED?

I use only cold and dark mission start. Never use autostart. The real world procedure to check the sight before starting the engine. The sight is obviously receiving power as wingspan, range, ballistic knob scales illuminate. But fixed net and piper don't appear until engine is started which is wrong and strange as engine doesn't support the ASP with anything the ground power and onboard inverters can not. Oh, and if I turn the engine on after all that, the sight scales appear on the reflector without touching anything sight or generally avionics related. Like projector has a separate power line than the sight in general, and that power line goes straight to the generator only.

Start cold and dark, connect external power, set up everything with engine still of and gunsight started working? In my case it only illuminates its scales, but the piper is absent, so as fixed net.

https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.io/view.php?id=889 Reported.

At first I was skeptic, but the sheer amount of progress in the last months is resembling an avalanche. Outstanding work!

Сын родился, дай выдохну немного. Пока завел про питание АСП, и неработающие лампы обрамляющие индикатор РЛС.

:cry::worthy:oh please let it be ASP and radarscope lamps!

Значит надо смотреть сопротивление и скороподъемность, я так думаю. Вес при замерах точно как указано? ЧР? Где-то тут были жалобы что плохо разгоняется в пикировании - это может быть хинт на баг.

Да, собираюсь построить и завести баги в багтрекере. Еще хочется как-то проверить все ли хорошо с лобовым сопротивлением безотносительно тяги двигателя. И где вы все берёте русскоязычное РЛЭ на бис? У меня только синее арабское.

Пока предварительно. Атмосфера +15С 760мм. Без подвесок, заправка 1300л, бесконечное топливо. ЧР включен. У земли. М=0.7. Макс установившийся вираж получается при УУА=20, n=5. При достижении УУА=28 вираж неустановившийся, n=7(должно быть 8 по графику). 8g набирается начиная с М=0.8. Надо смотреть недостаток ли это тяги или подъемной силы планера.

The saddest part is that art side of your projects deserve undisputed praise. But you guys get all the stones thrown into code! Seriously, important things are misimplmented since project start, other things get broken with time and only art fixes or improvements commence. It looks like you need to hire a coder. Im sorry, my chair is burning. I love the 21, bought it on the first week of selling. Just want it to get into shape under the hood. And buy a real papers corresponding Crusader afterwards.

Its all fun and all, but will it be unsupported eternal beta abandonware like MiG-21bis?

:thumbup: Благодарю!!! Вот это разговор!