Jump to content

Кош

Members
  • Posts

    1256
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Кош

  1. Серьезно ? :mad::mad::mad: Кто написал что ему "не хватает тяги"??? Откуда ты знаешь хватает или наоборот слишком много??? Как определил?
  2. Сколько g или градусов/сек он не дотягивает до графика установившегося виража без форсажа/с форсажем?
  3. Its not hard to code a variometer. Getting the engine gas and thermodynamics into its envelope is. As for systems - scratchbuilt TV and laser, Orbita-20 computer, SEAD container, KN-23 waypoint navigation and more are not present in the 23MLA.
  4. Absolutely no sense in flyable big civilian birds for obvious reasons, still some AI airliners for peacetime and local conflict/coin scenarios(especially Nevada) are much welcome.(and we already have Yak-40 and An-26, add An-24 and Tu-154 and Caucasus traffic would be complete. Add 737 and any traffic would be complete :)) ).
  5. No way, 27 is a different airframe(take the fixed air intakes instead of ramped ones alone), totally different equipment. Its like Hornet and Superhornet, or Mi-8 and Mi-24. Nevertheless, would buy both 23 and 27, especially K(the night precision strike), at full price. But then we need 80's Afghanistan.
  6. :cheer3nc: Thanks!
  7. Glad that 23 is still flying, a magnificent piece of engineering. Still that ТЭЧ needs a working compressor:) Mileage may vary :D
  8. The bird in the photo is decades old, a museum relic, painted with a brush. While some people would like a historic tour and pretend its 1958. I am nowhere near asking for anything, its your artistic expression after all. Just conveying my preference, don't mean to offend, besides I'm a game developer too. Closing the thrashed aircraft topic for myself.
  9. Looks lively. Just a little recommendation - now weathering seems to be evenly distributed almost everywhere, while real cockpits have paint wear and chipped places worn to the metal only where actual WEAR - takes place. While other places keep being intact. Just take a non-worn cockpit an imagine where would your body touch it the most - floor, left board of the pit where you step over it from the ladder, places your wrists slide near the throttle.. So most of the pit is intact even after 10+ years of service, and some places get paintless in two months. Same with the grime - how come the rear panel behind the seat is evenly covered in it - yep there is oxygen bottle there but no oil or hydro filling caps. Otherwise, thanks for your efforts and good luck with the progress. PS - again we have a "tank armor with thick layer of paint" feel, while real cocpit panels are like a cofee/tea tin can - thin sheet aluminum with semi-gloss single layer of very thin spray paint. Those evenly distributed chips and dents in the bump map are just not needed at all.
  10. Мои, выходные убил помнится. Для начала хорошо бы проверить взлетно-посадочные характеристики заявленным, макс скорость у земли и на высоте, что будет при превышении; полёт на разгон и потолок, скороподъемность. Если получится проверить дальность полета по документу - тоже было бы хорошо. Штопор... Тут бы узнать правильно ли он летает блинчиком для начала....
  11. Приборы?!! - Триста!!! https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3576512&postcount=369 - вот так можно?
  12. Вы можете в цифрах расписать в каком?
  13. :megalol::thumbup::doh:
  14. Там одинаковое крыло с одинаковой механизацией и оперение. Отличается развесовка(незначительно) и воздухозаборник. Оно не должно отличаться сильнее чем реальный Су-27 от ЕДшного. Хотя я конечно всё понимаю, посидеть пару вечеров настроить условия, полетать выдерживая параметры, пошаманить в Tacview, это конечно тяжело и лень. ЗЫ - разработчики признались что модель делали на основе данных по С, подтянув ПМ до его известных характеристик. Так что документы по С в нашем случае вполне валидны.
  15. Сравните для начала с С. С тем что с таким же хвостом.
  16. Вот читаю тред и пока не вижу ни одного сравнения графиков реала и модели. "Кажется, я думаю, должен, так а не так" - гуманитарии... При том что аж Чиж выложил РТЭ с характеристиками, испытывай не хочу.
  17. Can mods please delete this?
  18. Here's how its supposed to work and be used.
  19. It shows a weather forecast for Mars. Completely useless. The piper even does not move on the bullet drop axis with the manual distance setting. You can still train with the fixed net.
  20. Кош

    Cockpit 2.0

    Yep, we want a time travel machine:smilewink: Komsomol Warranty and all :smilewink:
  21. Кош

    Cockpit 2.0

    Would send the devs a drink after my first radar autoranged guns kill. Really hope for a properly sized, aligned, calibrated and working ASP.
  22. MiG-27K would cost a good separate 60 bucks, no less. Will eagerly throw them into the screen. Damn, it even has brrrrrt
  23. Analog systems made of vacuum tubes and mechanics have a constant refresh rate equaling infinity. RP-5 radar refresh rate is based on dish rotation speed. If you see anything not synchronized with it - than its not complete yet. RP-22 of the MiG-21bis has much more work to do to pass its scan pattern, something like an s inside of S, while RP-5 has two opposite dishes which just rotate in one plane like an old police flash.
×
×
  • Create New...