M0ltar

That is correct. Id suggest testing it with one month before moving on to the others. There is also a mod that was put out that adds an option to your GUI in game. I don;t remember the name of it though. It allowed you to pick which texture mod you wanted for each season. Give a look further down in the mods forum to see if you can find it.

Let's hope so. Let me know if there is a new version that you want me to test.

I forgot something else. I am running an accessory card to run another monitor. So the dual card theory could still hold. It is possible that that is causing as an issue, but it is not setup to use SLI. The 1080 is the primary and the GT710 is just running another monitor.

Right now Im running a GTX 1080. I was having this same issue when I was running 2 AMD 290Xs in Crossfire. I can try doing a reinstall of DX11. I gathered that it was a DX error, but I was unsure of what was causing it.

This is what I am seeing. Would this have anything to do with the export.lua in the scripts file located in my saved games directory? It currently has some stuff for helios in it. However, I want to say this is the same error I was getting before you did the 2.1 upgrade and came back to take a look while you were on hiatus.

When I run it, UltraMFCD starts fine and waits for me to start DCS. When I start DCS I am confronted with a C++ run time error. I have C++ distributions installed, but I still get the error. The error I get states that it is requesting something terminate in an unusual way. Any idea what is causing this?

Great news! Looking forward to the new release!

Feel free to message me if you need any testing or anything at all. Glad to have you back on the scene.

Would be amazing if this addition was even on the table for possible adding! Also, let me know if you need any guinea pigs for testing and of your fixes. Im currently running helios, but am always open to other things.

I have a quick question and Im not sure if this pertains to this thread, but I have been unable to get an answer. Is it possible to export, say, the left mfcd twice? Meaning that it would be exported in 2 different locations whether it be using ULTRAMFCD or using the normal export monitor options? Been trying to hunt for an answer and I can't seem to get it to work. If I add another line in the monitor config it just makes the first mfcd blank and exports to the second.

I don't know. Im enjoying watching this unfold. :argue: But, in all seriousness, I think we need to let the Buddyspike teak work out the air frames that are allowed in.

Not sure what your question is Rage. If exports are disabled on the server, than Leavu3 will not work. It works locally for you local information, like the F15 radar being exported to another one of your screens, but datalink does not work etc.

We really don't know what round 9 is going to be yet. Yes, the testing currently shows heaters only and the mirage being moved. However, Greg has said in the short past in this thread that this what not set it stone and that the current settings are only for testing. Why don't you wait until the actual round 9 thread is posted that lists the rules etc. before making statements like this. The BS team does the best they can at making things the way they think will be the most fun and challenging. I know I have complained in the past, but lets leave that for when we actually know for sure what the round will be, shall we?

Id be more than happy to take people through systems and such to get people going. Shoot me a PM and we can work something out.

Newest changes have nothing to do with why that testing round ended... Everyone was just playing on red. Nothing wrong with that. I think the most blue players I ever saw on was 6. Again, nothing wrong with that. I don't think this was an official testing round anyways. I thought it was just being used to do an initial test on what people would think of the changes.

Reaper I'm down if you'll have me. Just picked up the ka50 in a thought of going red next round away from my beloved A10C. Would love to learn from someone that's flown it for so long.

Its more than likely that you do not have the port forwarded from your router to your PC. When your router receives the network traffic from the remotely connected player it needs to know where to send it. This is done by logging into your router and configuring it. NOTE: Not all routers can do this. Some, especially ones that are provided by ISPs are heavily locked down. Here is a link that should give you a bit of insight on how to do it.

My point continues to stand!

Thanks for looking into it. I must say my last post was a masterpiece of Grammer. :doh:

I think he's saying it never repaired after it was closed. If that's the case it happens to blue last week once with maykop.we closed it and captured it, but it never repaired and just stayed at 0.the bunkers never responded so you couldn't refuel.

I don't think we can use the full 8 minute alignment time with the mirage to be far. You don't have to wait for the full alignment. Really you only need it if you are doing bombing runs,correct?

The Eagle takes 6 minutes to fully refuel. the SU27 takes 8. So I understand why this 20% thing was put in. The drop tanks need to just start empty to get the fuel weight to time ratio equal. However, a couple of other things here. The Mig29S starts with 100% fuel. Is the Mig29S meant to compete against the M2000? Reason I ask is because it can carry the same, though fewer, armament as the 27. Also, something that I don't know if it has been discussed. What is the range of the Eagle and the SU27 with full fuel in DCS? Does the SU27 have a longer or shorter range? That could justify the longer refuel time? Im not asking for rl, but DCS ranges. I, frankly have no idea. The reason I ask this is - does the SU27 have an extended range than the Eagle and if you remove some of the fuel from the 100% tank does it than make the fueling times even? A question about the drop tanks for the Eagle. In rl, are they prefilled or are they fill when fueling the plane? Below are what I have found to be, possibly, the rl ranges, but I want to know what the in game DCS ranges are. The SU27 has a longer combat range than the Eagle, but a shorter fairy range. I think that is attributed to the drop tanks and the SU27s massive internal stores. SU27 Ferry Range: 4,400 km Combat Radius: 1,200 km Eagle Ferry Range: 5745 km Combat Radius: 1000 km Lastly, stop attacking each other. I started this discussion to have a discussion, not the crap show that has been happening.

I would assume this would be impacted partly by how much time has elapsed after the server has restarted. I have no actually. There are too many variables in a multiplayer environment to say for sure which is why I am testing it right now. I am timing the time it takes the SU27 and the Eagle to refuel to 100%. Im giving the Eagle 2 bags because that is what most people fly with. I will post back with results here shortly.

Really? Im saying lets have constructive conversations and people keep posting garbage. Its really funny how people think that we used that. Think what you will. You can even ask the server admins here and 104th about discussions that our guys had with them about us not using leavu3. Its amazing that that is one of the only arguments people have against us is that they think we used it. Yes, we would have had it been allowed by the server admins, but they deemed it an exploit so we didn't. Frankly I feel bad for Yoda, who created it, because of the backlash against it. Yes, I understand why it was not allowed in multiplayer, but the way people voiced themselves was horrific. That man spent hours creating that and gave it to the community. RvE could have kept that for ourselves, but we didn't. Yoda gave his creation to everyone and was eaten alive for it. If it makes you feel better to think that RvE used leavu3 and that is the reason you died before the integrity check was put in than be my guessed. Whatever allows you to sleep at night. Enough about Leave3. I don't want this thread to divulge into what that thread in the mods and apps section was. You guys are only responding to parts of what I am typing. Yes I edit, but that is because Im thinking of other things to add to my post not because I don't want you to respond to everything. I said clearly before that I don't care if its RvE or anyone else exploiting, they should be banned. So you saying that only you should be banned is a load of, well you know. Lastly, why is that an issue with the Eagle taking off faster? Thats part of its ADVANTAGE! The SU27 has other advantages over the Eagle. Again, lets stop this nerfing and just let the jets be, for everything from CAP to CAS to rotor.

Id counter by saying things getting brought up repeatedly can sometimes mean things need to be changed. Secondly, its not a very wise plan to accuse someone of something and then say, 'ask him what he did.' It just makes you sound like you have nothing or are making up what you are accusing. Plus again, you admitted to exploiting. That makes you just as bad as this so called person. If you wanted the issue fixed you should have shown the person exploiting on Twitch to an admin instead of resorting to exploiting yourself. Lastly, I even said in my first comment that I wanted a discussion and not a sh*t show. Are you sure you read the whole thing because Im pretty sure me saying that from the start means that I want to talk about it instead of yelling at each other. I just wanted to bring it up to talk about and your red comrades made some good points. Again, its people like you accusing others of being dumb or what have you for saying certain things in general and then providing no counter arguments or facts to the discussion. Instead you resort to attacking the poster and accusing others of cheating and then state that you cheat yourself. Way to try and prove your point.