Jump to content

Vatikus

Members
  • Posts

    657
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Vatikus

  1. Not really... nothing what the guy said was not known before... if one looks at the flight manual, one will understand when this inertia rotation could happen. It is not a normal roll at all...
  2. Thx Azrayen
  3. If it is, it is not working ... you can see on the picture I had attached: same contact, just one shows PID other PIC mode.
  4. What is the function of this chevron? (chk pic)
  5. 13.VLS Vati mig21 I have experience as a GCI
  6. Thx Ironhand for giving the link... I got it elsewhere, but it's the same, yes.
  7. If someone is interested how real life R-27R1 works, there is a great reading material explaining exact guidance, etc. in the following book:
  8. As noted in my post "quasi"... I am fully aware that we do not have modelled instruments. What I did was show same data which would been transimted with Lazur via text. It was my experiment if it is possible to have something like that in DCS and it is. The harder part is making GCI AI to dynamically alter flight paths for intercept package (usually it was consisted of at least 3 pairs in wartime: bait, attack, escort)
  9. Please see the attached screenshot... is this just feature of contact memory or bug?
  10. It's not pretty, but it's doable... I've coded quasi Vozduh GCI system which guides you via Lazur on the target in a mode depending on target behaviour.. However since I got kind of burned out with waiting for mig21 bug fixes, the project is on hold.
  11. It is a great module... as some already noted, there some quircks about it, but overall it's a must ... I really look forward to its progress in development/fixes.
  12. It was a nice show... I f*cked with stalling engine in the fight at the end :D ... I look forward to next event. Cheers to all my mig21 bros :)
  13. There is a misconception of this floating around. What "fly" does, is that GCI sends flight direction to the plane and not that GCI actually flies the plane. Lazur and newer systems inform pilot how to fly the plane for the ideal intercept and this data is automatically extracted from GCI radar plots, computed and then sent via datalink. Pilot receives what speed, altitude, heading should he fly, and it also receives where to point his radar.... reading the manuals of these automatic intercept systems, it is amazing what level of automation was achieved already in the 60s.
  14. Since a lot has changed from the last manual revision, when can we expect the update?
  15. look carefully at the video... bombs are not at the same pylons group
  16. This could work... I've tested it in the past. However there is a bug that when you spawn as jtac, etc. you need to reselect the slot, to show opposition, else you see only friendly units...
  17. Will there be LotAtc option available?
  18. 13.VLS Vati - mig21
  19. Could you guys try to replicate what happens if you land and then t/o again w/o respawning? [edit]: Ok, i tested this more and I think I might have found the problem... my toe brakes axis were inverted, so it could happen that left toe brake got stucked in down position... I will test more in the following days to see if this was the real cause.
  20. I've rechecked.. bummer... I guess, I did not change enough of speed before... it does work like I thought it should been... thx :)
  21. Chrinik, I use the exact same procedure... using NWS to get to the runway and then make sure it's aligned with it and turn it off. If I leave it on, the pull is even harder.
  22. I was looking at the arrow you have drawn on display... should it be really fixed in length (and be just nose direction) or should its length change with the speed so that it actually shows own velocity vector which can be useful for intercept?
  23. What I have noticed is that if I ream/refuel in MP, pull to the left will happen... if I make fresh respawn, there wont be any pull on t/o.
  24. It does look a bit small, yes...
  25. The m-link max range is 25km, yes... however what kind of guidance law in terms of ratio of m-link/seeker lock is used ragarding launches under 25km, I do not have any information. Screenshot I posted from manual says 70% (for 27R1), but there is ambiguity, as it does not states the ranges. However the section I also posted, where it talkes about engaging targets which use chaffs, there are no problems for guidance. So if you keep lock, chaff makes no difference.
×
×
  • Create New...