msalama

Saved? But of course. We're not using them yet, we're just sharpening them now ;) :D

Elementary helo physics, just compensate with your controls.

They'll close automatically once you've got the engine running, so you'll need to open them manually later anyway.

Regardless. I expect the modules I've bought to be completed someday, and since many of them are still in various stages of (in)completion, I'm now waiting for them to finish before buying anything else.

Not applicable online though. There's the integrity check still.

Moment(s) of inertia.

Fixed, thank you.

Well I, too, decided to not buy any more modules from ED unless and until the Yak is finished someday.

It's not logic, it's Fri13. And never shall the twain meet.

Why the hell should I have any proof one way or another? I didn't model the plane and I'm not claiming anything either, so I don't have to prove anything. Go ask the dev if this bugs you. Regardless, they're either realism-oriented or "what-if", not both.

If there's no real-life evidence of airframe X having carried weapon Y, no realism-oriented developer is going to model such a combination either.

This is what PilotMi8 responded.

Dagger, regardless of what you say to him, his response will always be a turgid, melodramatic and foamy-mouthed wall of text written in bad English. So I'd just ignore the guy and let him stew in his own juices.

And according to you, so does ED. So go rant at their guys if this really irks you so much, because no amount of sheer knowledge seems to affect your foamy-mouthed stance one bit.

Hey Dagger. He'll never get it anyway, so you better just save your breath here.

You mean all the modules, not just WW2? Because my first was the original Shark back in 2008, and while the DMs for AI A/C and ground units both were always simplistic, they definitely weren't this broken back in the day.

They did work better earlier, or at least more consistently. Although thas was a while ago, probably before DCS WW2 became a thing.

Don't think it's denial, it's just stuff being broken.

So maybe, just maybe, you didn't hit anything critical? Not saying the DM isn't kind of wonky as-is though, but still.

You can actually make your own beacons. Open the ME, plonk down a jeep, add an optional Morse soundfile for aural ID, make it transmit AM on the KHz range and that's your NDB up and working.

Well, a pint of bitter would be nice. Thanks for asking.

Right then. Well, let's just say that I'm waiting for the people in the know to comment again and we'll then see how this develops.

Fri, seriously, you just CAN'T be this thick. If you want something altered, it is your job to produce evidence supporting the changes you want done.

Fri, you're not doing yourself any favors by being daft. The burden of proof is always on the person who brings a claim in a dispute.

Fri, provide evidence instead of conjecture if you want to get anywhere with this. Because the burden of proof is on you here.