Jump to content

Hans_Dampf

Members
  • Posts

    51
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hans_Dampf

  1. Sure,here you go.
  2. For some reason, some files wont play. When I load them, I get a error message saying: "The format of 'F:\Dokumente\Tacview\Tacview-20170305-000828-DCS-BASIS - Europe vs. USA 2.1.zip.acmi' is not supported" Even though it has the same format as the ones I can load.. any ideas?
  3. That right there. The Viggen only sold because it brought brandnew features like an A/G-Radar, Anti-Ship Missiles etc.. But, according to you, the appeal of the T-2 lies within its carrier capabilitys, something which the A7 can do too, and even more. The T-2 is obsolete, because it would not bring anything new to the table, which couldnt be done by airframes much more capable. I mean, its fine if you have that kind of love for it, but from a company's perspective it would be just uneconomical, sorry.
  4. Well, we've seen multiple times that devs help each other out with little things, tho providing the code for an A/G-Radar goes beyond that, I would guess. But I dont think this will be happening, too..
  5. I wouldnt say that, but I think LN's version is just tailored for the Viggen and might not be suited for much more advanced A/G-Radars like the A7/6 and F15E have, tho thats just speculation ofc.
  6. To me it reads like the ones which are listed are the ones who are being worked on. As the F15E requires the A/G-Rader from ED before it can move along, it is right now not being worked on and therefore not on the list. So I would guess, based on the statements made by RAZBAM, that we will see the 15E (and the others) once ED finished their A/G-Radar(?).
  7. Isnt the one in the pic posted by jojo a NA?
  8. @dimitriov: didnt one of the pilots even say, that the DCS Gazelle is closer to real life, than what they have in their training sim?
  9. Really appreciate the communication you guys have with us!
  10. ah ok, that makes sense! Thank you :)
  11. So has the functionallity changed? A few patches ago it used to work like this: be at e.g 10.000ft, select 15.000ft on the drums below the AP panel, engage "selected altitude hold" and the plane would start to climb and eventually switch to "altitude hold" when 15.000ft were reached, but now it does actually nothing really...
  12. It seems like that the "hold selected altitude" function does not work properly too? At least on my end the plane does not climb nor descent....
  13. for me it has, unfortunately, not been solved with this update...
  14. Wait... im confused. Just read on Facebook in a reply by RAZBAM "Later model, MIG-23MLD Flogger G" ( http://imgur.com/a/NxJng ). So are we getting the MLA or MLD?
  15. is there a way to rewatch the match?
  16. They also said in the AMA that they have the theaters "outsourced" to another company in Poland I think, so I don't think, that the maps are impacting the rest of the team as much as you might think...
  17. Maybe someone could record it?
  18. I think you didnt read the sarcasm in it, did you?
  19. @microvax and QuiGon, I really appreciate your efforts :thumbup: !
  20. Could someone lay out the differences in capability's and weapons between the different versions? I really like the Tornado but I don't now much about it :/.
×
×
  • Create New...