Ice

Just for you DMUT :D Because you are such a great guy 169th Panthers Dedicated Server. IP adress: 66.165.113.74 Please chage connection setting to 128/128

Paulie, your reply IS apreciated :) You did not give me any feedback though. Any comments? Your thoughts would ALSO be appreciated

I had same problem, typed the filename into google found it, downloaded it, and put it in windows/system32 where it belongs :rolleyes:

My Miniwar mission available here also uses these locations as SAM bases protecting the EW Radars at the top of the mountain. Very fun mission, I have some great screenshots somewhere of Shepski and I attacking the target.

Same as this But hopefully ED will fix this "Problem" with next patch. How's life in the Ubi forums anyway. Miss me ? :biggrin:

So Far my favourite era for Air to Air combat is LO-MAC Flaming Cliffs Era :icon_pidu

Awesome ! thankyou for replies. I go to work a happy chappy S! Oh by the way. Be sure you have the latest version.

Its not surprising to me that the LO-MAC community is dying. I spend a whole weekend making a unique mission. Over 2 hundred people look at the post but next to no one can be bothered checking it out or better still actually having a fly of it and posting some feedback. It makes me wonder why I and many others even bother.

I made a mission that's very challenging. Without tampering with the settings, see how long you can go for without losing a plane. Good luck! ==NEW VERSION== mission on this thread

I put these missions together to give some guns practice against AI aircraft. The 2 player is particularly fun. Here's a Short Demo Track to give the idea. Enjoy! GunsEx GunsEx-level-2

Hopefully ED wont forget to fix this bug next patch

Especially good news for 128Mb Card users http://ati.com

How's about a "realistic" Mod where the eagle can carry a couple of free fallers Mark ?

Nice 1 Shep, I will integrate this into my miniwar mission this weekend. If not before.

The Way I see it LO-MAC is just one step in a long long staircase that started with flanker 1.0. Flaming Cliffs is the next and so-on. My message here to everyone is if we support Eagle Dynamics. Sooner or later all of our wishes will come true. That means AFM's for all aircraft. In the end ED will have a repertoire of aircraft not unlike IL2 does today. Obviously each aircraft in a modern day jet sim is much more complicated and the community is alot smaller. But it is obvious to me that this is the ultimate goal. So cheer up I know that one day my squadron will get our carrier based F18. Ground Pounders will get there beloved F15E. The Euros will get their mirages. So on and So on. Until then. Apreciate what you have. There is no time like the present.

Alright, seeing as I HAD to chose an aircraft to see the results, I picked the 33. I'm with Cali. Its the closest one to a carrier based F18 :cool: Oh if some of you are thinking my new sig is boring. This is where I got the idea :tongue:

My History knowledge is poor but, Isn't "Achilles" a Heel ? :rolleyes:

Before this thread got out of hand, I actually intervened and tried to put some water on the flames I honestly havent noticed any real difference at least not with the way I fire and try to evade missiles. One thing that definitely seems to be the same and that is the 27ET is way too lethal head on. Being a IR or "Heat Seeker" it should not be nearly as dangerous as it is in head on shots.

I luvs em all :icon_jook

I've had the "Slider" at halfway for a week now, doesnt seem to be all that different I must say

For winning the 2012 Olympic bid. Should be a great event! :icon_pidu :icon_pidu :icon_pidu :icon_pidu :icon_pidu

Using Han's tracks as data.. 6 - 70 s: Not achieved. 56 Seconds at best and the needle dropped under 6 a couple of times 7 - 40 s: Not achieved. 32 seconds by my test !BlackOut-test-7 8 - 22 s: Spot on. From 19 seconds to 41 seconds in the track 9 - 12 s: Close. 10 Seconds !BlackOut-test-9 As for the guns only dogfight. Im not a fighter pilot but I find it hard to believe that a real pilot could sustain such extreme Grey-Outs repeatedly in such a short space of time. To me they would be classed as blackouts. It seems that if the pilot greyed out that much he would need a long period of time to recover before doing the same thing again. In that dogfight most of it was tunnel vision.

Airframes however do not blackout, and im sure if you read the intial post that is what this thread is about. How airframes handle Gz is a totally different subject and should be posted on its own thread.

Cobra360 This thread has NOTHING to do with Airframes. This is SPECIFICALLY to do with pilots. This is to do with 1 v 1 Guns fights. So please stay on the subject. Drakkhen, If you watch the track I made you will see I eased into 6Gz as lightly as I could specifically for this reason.

I found some interesting reading Centrifuge Training Some notes.. "The minimum standard for the course is 7 G for 15 seconds, which is an accepted norm throughout the world." "One of the important results of high-G research is the demonstration that subjects could be trained to tolerate high-G loads for prolonged periods (9-G up to 45 sec)" Currently in Lomac (test track supplied) at 10 seconds over 6 Gz, greying out starts to occur. By 25 seconds complete blackout. Personally I dont worry about the accuracy of Combat flight sims as much as some. I also dont limit myself to one aircraft so if i think the Su27 for instance has an advantage I will fly it. My comeback when someone has a complaint is allways "Its the same for both players. However in this instance it might be worth considering upping the tolerances just a little :icon_jook