Scabbers

That is one of the things i am working on now is the LCD Primary Flight Display

yah that would work but Avi stated to project it to a glass plate. so iw as following those lines. i have helped people build pits. :)

that would be awesome. but i am not sure who could afford the projetor to draw the hud....lol

side note. there is interest to replace the instruments with a Primary flight display monitor that will show all of the indications on one large montor with the exceptions of the MFD's

i know the 99 has a rat. Wasnt sure if they were modeling the ALQ-131 or a different version.

F35 for the win

yes it will interface. as it only detects the missle motors, specifically plumes. But I was curious to which early warning systems that were being included in the sim.

thanks deadman. I am up on what is currently in the real bird. i am curious to what they are modeling in the game. The ALR-67 and 69 are very close to each other. the difference is in the computers. I was just curious to see what they were modeling in game is all. ;)

thanks alphaone any possibility to give a screenie of a threat on the RWR in game?

Are you refering to the article for the AAR-47?

Though the 69 makes sense :)

nothing your not on the dev team....lol. I was curious as to what RWR display pattern they were going to use

I beleive it is the ECM POD on the left wing atleast that always was an ECM POD. no telling what you guys are calling it. Left wing stations outboard to in board. POD - LAU Pod - Maverick Rack - Bomb rack - Bomb Rack.

then what RWR are we getting. AAR-47 does not detect radar and the A-10 has an early warning system

What version of threat warning are you modeling. The APR-39/44 ALR-67? Was curios as to what RWR you were going to use?

Are you going to model the propellor for the pod. The Propellor generates power for the pod. I see you have the fan blades turning in the engine. I was wondering if you could model this and how much of a potential FPS hit it might be if it were modeled.

BTW the ARC-210 supports 1553 data bus and ARINC-429. That means that a remote head is not needed. it can be completely controlled through the CDU.

Kaiza not sure what you are refering too. I am refering to the screenshots from the new A-10C web page.

No no those are definately the ARC-186 and 164 Controls boxes. I was just asking about the 210.

kaiza I am glad I amuse you.... :P

In the 10C i thought the 210 replaced the 164 and 186's The 210 offers A-J options as well as have quick and singars. It also interface for the Data link function as well as VOR/ADF

well if you all ever need anything let me know. I have no problem reviewing for accuracy :)

i understand. But if the info i gave can help then i am a happy guy :) Avionics is what do.....lol

Guys I am looking at the screenie of the VHF Controls and I see an issue or two. One the top control is an ARC-186 Control but modled correctly. Not an issue if you chose an ARC-186. Two the middle UHF looks nice and tuned to guard. very nice inded. just wondering with a man/gaurd control why would you tune 243 Mhz when you can just flip the switch? Also where is the TR+G Mode. This is to monitor the selected frequency or preset and the guard frequency. Guard would have overide priority on the receiver. But the bottom is labled as a VHF. however it is displaying an HF frequency. HF is 2 to 29.999 Mhz VHF/UHF is 30-399.975 Mhz. your setting is 12.500 MHz. Just wondering if it is a goof? BTW the MFD's are awesome and I like the CDU. Very nice indeed.:pilotfly:

Because the USAF does not use the MK-83. The navy does. USAF uses the MK-82 and MK-84