Kerosene

Hello Razbam Thanks again for the fantastic job you did on the Mirage 2000. I have often heard the M53-P2 professionally on the ground and find that the new sounds do not produce enough high frequencies. In the latest update, the high-pitched whistle of this engine is missing. In the video you just posted the sound is closer to the real rendering than in the current version. In any case, thank you for the work you produce for our greatest pleasure.

+1

All comparative tests should probably be done in a standard atmosphere. Atmospheric pressure and temperature variations in missions may, in part, explain variations from the documentation.

yes the numbers of the counter of the backup altimeter go down to 870 mbar but the needles stop turning sooner depending on the altitude of the terrain. I don't understand this behavior. For example on the Syria map, on Paphos airfield the needles go down to 975 mbar and stop rotating and on H3 Northwest they go down to 890 mbar. Do you have technical datas concerning the real F1 altimeters?

indeed, it is not possible to set the altimeter at QFE on several airfields and this also limits the possibility of bombardment.

Hello Aerges, The altimeters setting adjustment does not lower the pressure enough. The limit is 930 mb on the slave altimeter and 902 mb on the backup altimeter. Is this a normal limitation ? This behavior is not observed on the Mirage 2000.

Firing an AIM-120 in RWS mode. I wait for my missile to pass Pitbull then I lock a second target. On my radar I see the symbology concerning my first contact applied to my second target. I know the radar is in WIP but is this normal? F-16 RWS Test.trk

Hello AEGES I am very excited to see a Mirage F1 on DCS. I noticed a few details of the landing gear that look strange. First, it appears that the loaded aircraft, landed on the ground, is not pressing on the main landing gear jacks. Secondly, the 3D modeling of the nose gear and the main gear does not seem complete unlike the other DCS modules. I know F1 is in WIP but can you confirm that? Once again, AERGES is doing a great job on this module and I will undoubtedly be a buyer as soon as it is released in EA.

to BEHill75 Yes I meant, GAU type 30mm

don't forget to divide by 100 To convert 41° 12.40' --> 40x60/100 = 24" --> 41° 12' 24"

For Wolixe you must convert decimal degrees to degrees minute second. you can put this table in your kneeboard. The result in the table is read directly. For example, 0.5 minute corresponds to 30 seconds and 0.35 minute corresponds to 21 seconds.

+1

+1 Most bugs reported for the Harrier are not listed in the bug tracker. Razbam what is your interest in hiding these bugs?

Same on Normandy and GP

Same here

Same here on MP and Persian Gulf map

For me, static building type objects appear at a very short distance and with the zoom in function fully.

Waypoint Offset elevation the ODU elevation entry for waypoint offset is in meters. It is really not practical when all the altitudes are in feet. (on the plane, F10 map, in flight or in the mission editor) Is this how it is for the Harrier in real life?

No problem with the rampstart I recommend reading this guide: https://www.mudspike.com/chucks-guides-dcs-av-8b-harrier-ii/

In terms of 3D graphics and textures, RAZBAM has done a wonderful job. From my point of view the Harrier is one of the most successful modules. For the avionics , the result is far from being as good. Each new system produced by RAZBAM comes out bugged and many uncorrected bugs remain for months or even years. If you are looking for a module to exploit only the surface, it is a good module but if on the contrary you want an airplane with normal DCS standards run way, the Harrier is far from being complete or properly functional. Razbam had planned to finish the Harrier in 2019 but they are still far from it and with all the new developments announced, I have doubts about their ability to complete this module quickly.

Same feeling here.

In my case, the DMT and the Tpod are powered up. Should the DMT be cut to use the Tpod ?

+1 Same thing for me. The Tpod loses the target on Wp designate, Mark point designate and even on TDC locking target. When a turn at low G the pod moves a few tens of meters from the target but after a high load factor turn it can lose it completely.

Excellent initiative RAZBAM, but the list of bugs in the AV8B bug tracker is not exhaustive.

@ Chapa Everything you say is very pretty but it does not answer the question. The Facebook and youtube channels only serve as a showcase for RAZBAM to communicate about some news but they never write anything about bug fixes. On this subject, total silence. Decoy, the community manager, has nothing to tell us about this list of bugs that is growing update after update. I remind you that there is a bug tracker on the site RAZBAM but this one is not maintained any more for a long time.