Sov13t

Interesting document. Thanks for sharing, in the same document we have some good tables for AIM-7 (this is for an earlier discussion in this thread): as well as quotes like these: Which is 46.3km - not saying anything but just an interesting note. Still going through the document, didn't find what you are referring to with the M4+ figure. ---- Интересный документ. Спасибо за название, в этом документе есть несколько хорошихй таблиц - по АИМ-7 например. А так же пару директив "пуск АИМ-120 произвести на удалении 25 миль (46.3км)" Всё ещё читаю документ, но пока не наткнулся на М4+ цифру для АИМ-120. Для тех кому интересно вот ссылка на документ который ГГ привел: http://www.cnatra.navy.mil/pubs/folder5/NFO_SNFO/P-825.pdf

Jeez man... creeping me out!! :lol: What is his favorite breakfast meal?

Us NOVAians have to stick together :thumbup:

Matt went to JMU huh, are you from NOVA area Matt?

In fifteen years.

Ребят, а вы не думали таквью выкладывать? Некоторые моменты на видео было бы интересно параллельно с таквью смотреть. Спасибо за очередной выпуск!

Will have my tinfoil hat and geiger counter out, just in case.

И все таки цифра не правильная. G/S=330-340кг/м2

Don't forget that DCS engine is not the most optimized either. There comes a point where no matter how much you throw at it, it will have diminishing returns.

I just set an FPS cap of 30 for my 5860x1080 set up to avoid noticing huge drops in FPS. Going from 120 to 50 can be rather noticeable. Running a GTX 670 4GB and 5860x1080.

Wish the E-E conflict was better documented. From the numbers I saw, launches were performed in pairs, and if outside parameters both missiles were doomed from the get-go. Which can quickly deflate statistical analysis.

The development of the 27 programme didn't sit still after 1984 either. By 1988 the first T-10M was produced and future upgrades to avionics, radar, TVC and even low IR nozzles were all tested/experimented with. A lot of what we see today on such birds like the 35/PAKFA has direct roots from that time period. Our "Nineties" didn't help much. Either way, both aircraft deserve proper treatment and a more accurate realization - and from the "hints" of it, ED does not disagree.

I believe only a successful hit of any missile/projectile that causes damage to your airframe should be considered for any statistical manipulation. The game already does this if the damaged airframe crashes the kill message and the kill goes to the shooter. Hypothetical hits are just that. As GG pointed out what if it is indeed a legitimate disconnect? Sorry, but the guy didn't have a chance to even evade the missile and the missile never hit him anyway. The urge to "cheat" the system is quite high Speed, we have seen guys changing nicknames quite often, we have seen them spam missiles beyond their allotted numbers even when they knew they have exceeded their limits, we have seen people change UCIDs just to "reset" their stats and/or avoid their kicks/bans. My .02

Strange, the Soviet manuals/scenarios I have read or have access to all normally compare the Flanker to F-15C not A. But I understand your point.

In his algorithms for kill calculation Case was able to combat this relatively well. Missile hits were recorded with enough information to make a calculated guess that the person exited the aircraft/server because he was shot down. This can be automated by looking at timestamps of events within certain margin. If it is a disconnect while your aircraft is being engaged and it gets hit while you are still in the "time out phase", I feel that it is still fair to count it as a kill. If anomalous activity was detected, a "chat" with the person would follow. Afterwards, gulag. I would assume any competent statistical engine will take this into account in the future as well.

SU-27 was in service 1984. MSIP didn't happen till 1985 no?

I just try to /ignore most of these now. How's yours?

Dates please... --- Man these conversations/monologues after years and years.... just become :doh:

Просто продолжаем "полезный" разговор, пока ждем поправок/патчей. Разве это вредно?

"Цифры вслух" Перепроверим... 5350 / 2 = 2675 кг Топлива 2х Р-27Р = 506 кг или 2х Р-27ЭР = 702.8 кг 2х Р-73 = 210 кг СУ-27С = 17500 кг ---- Сумма = 20891кг (Р) 21087.8кг (ЭР)

After performing a successful fingertip landing on the Kuznetsov, number 2 (me), sank immediately through the Kuznetsov into it's lower deck and then got left behind fishing.

Problem fixed by setting character generation rate to 10 keys per second and pulse event time to 50ms.

Шутеры конечно плохой пример, там растояния и время полета патрона не те. Ошибка наведения аккумулируются очень быстро с нашими дистанциями и времеными рамками. Можно сверять координаты ракеты и цели со стороны стрелка и со стороны цели. Если они имеют расхождение больше определенного значения то ракета не попала. Но это приведет к такому "беспределу" на трэках/таквью что думаю будет больше головняка. Сейчас получается что стрелок имеет точные координаты своей ракеты, а цель имеет более точные координаты своего ЛА. И в этом случае ракета выигрывает если цель маневрирует с задержкой...

Hey guys: Stumbled on an input issue that at first didn't give much attention to, but now notice that it wasn't accidental but in fact has some underlying issue to it. I use TARGET to create simple and straight forward key assignments. With DCS World I have noticed that sometimes when I activate a switch that uses a modifier such as CTRL, SHIFT, ALT DCS World will not notice it and just take the second part of the command. Here is an example: Joystick button is bound to LCTRL + L for Navigation lights. In DCS World when toggling the joystick button randomly the Cockpit lights will come on instead of the Navigation lights. Which leads me to believe it only sees L being pressed instead of LCTRL + L. What I have done so far: - Increased pulse time to 30ms from the default 25ms in TARGET. (didn't help) - Ran event tester while flying. The event tester shows perfect execution LCTRL + L being pressed and released as they should. While the game still inconsistently misses the modifier. Any help or suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks!

Great job slam, what was the story? Just to make sure we see your view of it?