Nedum

The questions that arise are solely the following: 1. Do the displays in the HUD actually work differently? If so: 2. Why should there be a different mode of operation depending on the orientation (vertical or horizontal)? I would like to have these questions answered, because these are the questions that are really important! What is the logic behind the RADAR alignment indicator being displayed in horizontal alignment with the nose of the aircraft, while the vertical alignment is displayed level with the altitude? What could be the reason for this? If the RADAR antenna indicator is actually supposed to show the alignment of the antenna with the object, the current vertical display would of course be incorrect. It doesn't make sense for that reason alone, as the pilot needs to be able to see when the RADAR will lose contact due to the angle to the object. This is currently not possible vertically. So what is the purpose of this cursor? If the answer is: “To be able to recognize in time when the tracked object will leave the maximum gimbal range!”, then the current display in the vertical range is >>incorrect<<! To recognize this, all it takes is simple logic, and nothing else!

He was writing one can start the engines without a running APU and without ground power. How does that work?

Would you please explain, why the DCS MIG 29 is the only DCS 4th gen fighter with such a weak Landing Gear? Why does the "weak" DCS F16 Landing Gear not suffer from the same "weakness" as the Landing Gear of the MiG 29? If we compare, then please in the right way! If a DCS F16 Landing Gear doesn't break if I ride several hundred meters over the grass, why does a DCS MiG 29 get a broken leg from only touching the grass with its toe? One is for sure! The current Landing Gear of the DCS MiG 29 is much, much, much too weak in comparison to the Landing Gear of the DCS F16. A blind man should see this! If the behavior, the weakness of the Landing Gear from the MiG 29 should be ok, and so be the new reference, I would really like to see how all the other Landing Gears would behave in relation to this new reference!

There are a few things I can see. First, the DCS environment is nearly 20 % too small. Buildings and Cars are too small. Second, the DCS IPD change only the Cockpit scale and does nothing for the World scale.

Please Guys, if you want help, then help those who want to help you. Show us your DCS settings. It's strange that those who want to help you post pictures more often and more frequently than those who want this help. Problems are often just symptoms, frequently triggered by multiple settings in the DCS system. Are mods installed? If so, which ones? Do you have the fxo and metashaders2 folders in the game settings section under DCS? If not, do so. Shader problems are not always solved by simply toggling the switches in the DCS settings.

The "PIMAX" settings you talk about are by 100 % the ones from Tally Mouse guide. Even the not necessary "Eye Tracking Switch" is enabled, who only causes issues with XRNeckSafer and does nothing for the Eye Tracking. There is no need for the Nvidia sharpening.

Hi, steht auf Seite 61.

@HOKUM52 Thank your for your report. There is a new Thread for the new PIMAX-Tool. It would be nice, if you would use this Thread to collect all the issues there. The fix could be disabling Bloom in the DCS VR settings section and Flares and Dirt in the System settings. Strange if you have the issue only with the newest PIMAX tool. Cheers

Same.

What you have described is the issue you will get if you enable the Eye Tracking switch in the DCS VR settings. There is !!no!! need to enable this switch for Eye Tracking with a PIMAX OG or Super Headset.

@Dangerzone the line about Hot Plug are not necessary anymore. It works perfect with the buttons in the system tab. You can enable or disable Hot Plug in the game on the fly. With the lines in the autoexec.cfg you are unable to use those buttons, which could cause problems, because most people are unable to remember what they have written in the autoexec.cfg after a few weeks. Or is there a reason to make it the autoexec way?

@MadMonty Thank you for your work! I want to address one thing. The Eye Tracking switch in the DCS VR settings does nothing for a Pimax Headset and causes problems with the XRNeckSafer tool. You should never use this switch if you want to use XRNeckSafer. To date, I am not aware of any Headset that require this switch.

yep, one of my favorite features right now.

Quad views customize, what is hidden behind all the fancy names? How does which slider make differences in visuals and better fps/frame times? A single pictures can say more than 1000 words! I always have to ask companies why they are unable to work with the most powerful human being interfaces, the eyes? Make a picture of the expected visuals, name the zones with the names of the sliders and tell, what will happen, if you move the slider to the right or the left. Only one single picture could catch thousands of questions. What's the reason, companies still trying to compress all the necessary information into 2 text lines, and at the end no question mark of the customer is erased? Click the Information point (I) and open a single picture with most if not all information. Thousands of questions less for the support, because now most people can !!see!! what each slider will do! It could be so easy, so good for both sides, and perhaps the good idea behind all the work, would get the attention it deserves. To let the customer fiddle it out by himself is the worst way to get acceptance of what you try to sell. At max 10 hours of work could bring you more customers and spare you thousands off dollars for the support. Please, give us pictures! And if PIMAX wants to act like a pro, make an animation pop up, if you change the sliders, and with each move of one of the sliders the customer can see what he is !!doing!, in real-time. Too hard for Pimax? I don't think so.

For me, it looks like you have a big problem with your PC. I am pretty sure it has nothing to do with the Pimax Software or the Crystal Super. Your CPU can be one of the those which has the degenerate issue. Ones it has started, nothing can stop it. Your CPU will die! You should check this at first! Have you OC your PC? If yes, try to test all this with a BIOS reset. Still Problems? Open the consol as admin and type the following: sfc /scannow Windows scans your System and if it finds issues it will try to repair them. After each repair, you have to restart the PC and repeat this till there are no issue messages anymore! Still issues? Install the newest drivers for your board and all your hardware. If there are still issues, take a closer look at your hardware! Is your power supply sufficient for your hardware? At least 850 Watts. Is the cooling good? Does something overheat? There are many things you should check before we take deeper looks. Try to upload your dxdiag file (type it in your Windows search bar and after seeing the tool, store all the information and upload the file).