Charly314159

Well done ;)

I noticed this happening when playing with process lasso to try to improve things. It was link to the process priority set to realtime if I remember correctly. Have you turned this kind of thing?

And what's the point of OB if every user who encounters a problem roll back to stable? Reported problems should be fixed in a reasonable time frame, that's the only answer.

Sorry yes I am a bit angry, since February there have been numerous post about the fact that this version was broken and unplayable for many all we got were "we're looking into it statements" and quite useless updates. Had ED taken this seriously from the beginning we wouldn't be in such a bad shape today. I know I shouldn't be that angry, it's just a game after all and there are more important matter nowadays, but it's how much I liked it.

I guess that's what you get when not listening to (or censoring) the beta testing community

The point of a beta version is to try things while being able to roll back if required. What's makes it difficult now is that the roll back should have occurred weeks ago instead of pilling up things on top of this broken version.

If we do that VR could be forgotten and might end up being forever broken...

I think you have more than enough data, people have been posting about this issue since February. Time to get serious about this

Haha good one! We have not been able to play DCS for more than 2 months so be sure we have tried everything already...

I will most likely quit DCS all together if things keep going this way.

Can I remind you that the F18 has been in EA for 2 years and that they almost stop it to focus on the F16? What do you think will happen with the SC? Have you seen the list of the features that should be present at release vs what was advertised in the YouTube trailer? And I am not complaining about the delay, I would gladly wait if I was certain the module was released on a playable core.

In some instance

I have been buying Early Access for the past years to support ED but quality has been lower and lower. Remember the Viper launch? LOL. It is not an Early Access program anymore, it is a Ponzy scheme. ED is funding on promises. That's enough

Good morning, Having lost all faith in Eagle Dynamic's ability to deliver acceptable performance (VR unplayable for more than 2 months) and finished modules I would like to get a refund for the SuperCarrier. How should I proceed? I refuse to encourage this flawed business model which is slowly but surely leading to the death of DCS.

In some instance, 2.5.6 has been unable to run decently in VR even with the best PC money can buy nowadays. That's the difference.

It seems clear something like this is happening. Moreover this performance issue should have been the top priority.since the release of 2.5.6 instead of that they kept building on top of this borked version. At this point they should just revert back to 2.5.5 graphics. Anyway I don't see the point in having new lightning if everything else needs to be set to the minimum to have something not even running well. At this point I believe ED would save time by rewriting everything from the ground up but it's not going to happen as long as people are buying modules...

I tried today's update both with and without the mod but it doesn't seem to make any difference anymore. Probably because my settings are turned all the way down to try , without success, to have something playable...

Yes especially when VR performance improvement has been stated several times in the DCS roadmap update thread over the past two days.

No FPS improvement neither...

I really don't see the point of releasing the supercarrier on an unusable version of DCS. I am probabling going to ask for a refund if it's the case..

Unfortunately it is not a matter of hardware. Even people with the best PC money can buy are reporting unacceptable performance. The problem is piling up features on top of a fundamentally un-optimized/broken core.

That's a lot of data, when do we get the +50% of perf? It's about time since we just lost 30% with 2.5.6.

The issue is that the nice graphics ED worked hard to produced have now destroyed VR gaming ... And if you turn things down to have it running it is uglier than ever before...

The OB core has been broken for 2 months now and is unusable for a lot of users especially in VR. ED is investigating but it looks like the spagetti code is exploding. Two more weeks ...

Sorry I was just underlining the apparent lack of consideration this issue seems to receive from the devs. I don't see how it's off topic. I think we have all been really patient over the last two months but it is really discouraging to see changelogs adding features on top of a broken core. And that you have been unable to understand what change you made have created this issue (which should be trivial with modern development methods). I have been promoting DCS for the past to years and doing instruction on M2K for half a year. I am really starting to regret my implication in all this.