Yo-Yo

What a Newton's binom... ©

Nope. It is well known place of the airfield. You can use google to locate the point the camera and the plane are. And, by the way, do you really think the plane landed through these trees and just next to that orange steel garbage? :D

I can not find a track in your link, please attach it to the post. And I will show you something interesting. :)

The plane lost a half of stab, that makes neutral plane unstable -> higher AoA -> higher AoA. Lift of this plane rises up to 40 degree AoA, so even 260 kph that is good to fly at AoA = 12 deg can through the plane high.

Have you seen the difference between a clean plane and a plane with a chute? If you mean Kvochur's landing I can turn your attention to the second landing in my video. It is very close to it. And it is safe.

Why not the Me-262?

This nose-down effect described as"strong" is mentioned in every manual for this plane. If you take a look at the in-cockpit video you can see the final fast stick pulling at touchdown. Ground effect you mentioned works in both directions - it increases the lift slightly but causes nose-down pitch effect due to downwash changes. If you find a video where the pilot holds the stick frozen at touchdown as you do or where the plane hits the ground with the nose wheel . P.S. this is the video our L-39 and MiG-29 SME lands the plane exactly as it should be in RL. Take a look at the stick movement.

I posted this video not to say the planes must demonstrate EXACT behavior. As you can see the planes are a bit different with different stability margins, for example, different wheels service limits, etc, etc. The goal of this video is to show that progressive bouncing is absolutely normal for this situation, but of course the exact angles, rotational speed must not be the same, for sure. MiG-29 itself has low, up to neutral at AoA higher than 15 degrees, stability and at low speed the aircraft has low ability to counteract the moments from the ground strike. If you take a careful look to 1-28 you can see that nose wheel impulse is not a reason for a rotational acceleration as the plane hits high AoA where the plane becomes instable. DUE TO THE LOST STABILISER.

Absolutely normal. I posted L-410 cadet's landing with the same typical behavior. MiG-29 nose wheel is known as a bit bumpy by the way. Take a look at the nose wheel: it is over the ground. The point is that there is a small water drain pit there (Kubinka) and the plane at taxiing behaves this way. I know that there is a video but I can not find it now. https://russianplanes.net/images/to249000/248128.jpg

I can not say about MiG-21... it is not ED made. :) It is quite simple to master the landing at least to perform it safe. As you are confident in "school" landing you will be able to perform it more free. It is exactly what is written in the manual. 1. Stabilised approach - 5 m/s sink rate at 290-300 kph. 2. Start flaring at 280-290 kph at 8-9 m (take a look at radio alt on HUD) 3. Look forward-left to check altitude and maintain touchdown attitude progressively pulling the stick. Gently retard the throttle. 4. Freeze the stick at touchdown to avoid ballooning. As the flaring is very fast, I think, this video could help. Please pay attention to the approach parameters/attitude, flaring start and virtual stick movement (can be seen at control box window as well). Notice the right landing attitude at touchdown.

Yes, you need to apply a lot of aft stick at flaring constantly and fast keeping AoA or attitude. Additionally you need to keep in mind that reducing throttle creates nose-down pitching moment too. Su-27 is different plane, so it's handled in different way.

What do you mean "not get into certain landing parameters"? I showed that even if you land with the speed even more than 330 kph that is MAXIMAL PERMITTED SPEED nothing happens. I showed that even at three point touchdown nothing happens. I think you do not consider the first suicidal video with 400 kph nose down ground strike as "landing not get into certain landing parameters"?

Чем больше , тем лучше. В каждом зипе только один вылет, но все треки. Потому что еще набрать статистику по типовай "хорошей" сети желательно.

Про версию чуть позже, да трек со стандартным пилотажем у земли вполне подойдет. Можно пару-тройку клиентов и сервер.

Of course, I can not replicate Kvochur's landing with 1% accuracy, because we do not know 2 things - landing weight and exact speed he deployed the parachute. And obviously I can not exactly replicate his control inputs. But the second landing in my video demonstrates the chute deployed higher than standard flaring altitude, and the plane landed to three points simultaneously without bouncing, so no "weird nose wheel", etc. Please show the track or video or both, what seems weird to you.

Have you seen the video above?

Yes, 260 (270...275 at HUD) at touchdown.

300 kph is not normal for the normal landing mass and flaps down, and would be considered as a possible accident reason. If someone attempt to land at this speed he must be very careful avoiding significant sink rate, because the plane has a lot of lift to bounce. And any nose wheel touch down is strictly prohibited because of two reasons - it leads to immediate nose-up AoA lift bounce, and the nose wheel is not designed for touchdown strikes.

Higher speed than 350 kph??? As the directed touchdown speed is 260 kph? Nosewheel touchdown? Are you kidding? The cadet who tries to land MiG this way will be fired in seconds... even earlier he enters a hospital.

There are only few things from the aircraft manual to land a MiG : 1. Approach speed and glide slope (310 starting the final and 280 kph at the end) and glide slope (50 m over a radio beacon). 2. Starting flare at 7-9 m over the surface at 280 kph. 3. Do not hesitate to pull the stick just before a touchdown maintaining touchdown nose attitude. 4. Gently pull throttle back to idle only after you are see that the plane is home and dry.

I am not sure but all these references seem to me as something like variable vanes of the blower itself (except the last one) as it was in Jumo-213 or AM-35 engines. These means change blower pressure ratio at constant rpm. The last one means variable geometry (area) of the nozzles. P-47 turbo was absolutely straight forward device and the rpm, so its power, was set by setting P_nozzle/P_outside ratio. If you have no waste gate gas flow and backpressure are physically linked depending on nozzle area. As it is fixed you can only dump a part of gas flow bypassing the turbine through the waste gate.

Нет, ничего не делали.

Можно посмотреть. Это последствия очередного компромиссного решения в пользу не очень хороших сетей с пропаданием пакетов. Чтобы облегчить нам работу, можете собраться и записать сетевые треки с участием 2-3 самолетов. Но нужно прислать треки с каждого клиента и с сервера.