spikef22

hey have any of yall been able to get the ship borne countermeasure suites to activate?

I honestly hope we here some more on this project in the next 6 months, the Su-22 if it is indeed to become a module. Will with out a doubt be one of the most important cold war modules for redfor going forward. A FF soviet attacker is a MUST HAVE!

@LetMePickThatany update on the SAMP/T you've been working on?

Its still being worked on its just mostly feature complete ATM and will be revisited at a later date

Hey current hill I've been really enjoying your mods! The recent Bal complex filled a hole I've been wanting filled for a very very long time! I had a few requests for future systems and vehicles! Sino air defense HQ-9B/C HQ-61 HQ-16 (Sino buk-m2) Western/ pacfic allies SAMP/T Landceptor Martlet Starstreak Chu-SAM K/KM-SAM Land based towed gun systems like the M777 Ruso, sino and american MRAPs Armed tigr Cougar H MATV Improved american and Chinese infantry M4 and QBZ-95 as well as m249 and type 88 guys Javelins and HJ-12 AT-4 and PF-98 loitering munitions Switchblade Lancet 3 Harpey WS-43 Thanks!

I did the same but still had the same issues with some units

Hey I'm having the same issue as JFCsloss as well! It only effects a few units mostly IFVs but a reinstall was not effective

I would LOVE for systems to send up a huge white cloud when they get hit instead of the smaller explosions that every other vehicle in game currently do. Air defense systems are chalked full of fuel and warheads a nice cook off and explosion would be great feed back for us who do DEAD :3

I was getting back into the JF-17 today after a hiatus and noticed that (Dis) was in parentheses in the mission editor for them. What does this stand for? Disabled? I was having some issues with the CM-802AK which I may make a bug report on later but I'm curious as to what that this acronym means.

Well one caveot I think that needs to be mentioned is how far off is this actual implementation? From the sounds of it ED still has plenty of work to do on that pod And even then if ED are willing to do large amounts of work on the vipers TGPs I can only hope that means the sniper is very close behind. It would suck to be forced to just use the lantirn for like a year tho if that's not the case...

+1 here I think removing litening would seriously hinder the capabilities of the viper. It should at least be left as an optional capability. My hope is we are least hear some news on sniper soon which is my hunch but JUST having the lantern would well suck for modern Operations

It would appear the HQ-7 is still struggling to hit anything

Hello! I heard a performance page was planned but we havent heard any new news about it lately? Hoping to see it in future update

Ok yeah that worked for me! What's odd is that I was using simple comms

Im having issues rearming the Hip when the engines are running its behaving sort of like an FC3 module. I can rearm when its cold and dark. I assume this is a bug with the latest update

Hey, with the F-18 approaching the finish line can we expect the EMCON key on the UFC to be fully fleshed out? The F-16s Quiet/Silence switch is modeled so I expect well see this in the nearish future?

Do keep in mind this is Aerges first attempt at making an fcr for one of their modules and they needed EDs help making it so I imagine it will mature. not to mention we will be seeing a brand new radar set on the F1M

Im assuming that will come later. Alot of the binds in general are 1.0. I use a hat switch for my flaps so its no big deal to me but mileage may very

Sorry does this mean it's fixed in a testing build or that it's fine in the current OB and I just didn't notice it in my testing? Thanks

As title says. sometimes units will phase through said fences but yeah its like a massive invisible wall when its well a wire fence haha Miz right here its really simple but shows the issue AIbugV1 .miz

Well let's be pragmatic for the moment. Aerges has been throwing screen shots out daily on Facebook. And it's pretty clear that most if not all systems have been integrated as far as the screen shots/videos we have seen convey. I'm sure there is still internal bug work and well as EW and radar tuning but im honestly betting we will see it in no more than a month tops. My bets on Bastille day personally. A tad bit off topic but has aerges released an official weapons list? I'm very curious as to see what the mirage F1M gets from an arms perspective super 530F and Exocet would be very enticing especially if aerges gives us the C-101 treatment there.

Super Étendard! Would be super fun to get the Charles as well! Would bring a very unique naval strike fighter to the dcs sandbox!

Big agree with you here! From what I've gathered, Razbam are at least trying to release the Mudhen in a semi polished state. Close to something like the Mi-24s launch. If they can pull this off ill be pretty impressed. To be honest I think Razbam has learned from their mistakes with their previous work so im keeping my hopes high. One thing to note is that I woudn't be shocked if we dont get the LANTIRN NAV pod at launch. Its TFR and subsytems are pretty complex and will definitely need a lot of work to polish out. Im assuming we will at least have LITENING though!

Im currently having a very annoying issue with liberation.No matter what I do i cant get my flights to ground start :/

no problem and thankyou very much. gonna give the mod a spin for the first time!