Vakarian

Yup, it's well known A-10 bug which was hard to nail down in a track for a while

No need to be snarky, I said nothing about the inscription. However, check the russian part of the forums, there is some info about the switches.

What muffler is saying is that there is no switch under the "cover", the cover is the switch.

Just a few posts under yours

@BIGNEWY Well, you posted the proof that the current implementation is incorrect nullFirst is the pic you posted, notice how the taxiway is inline with the shelter ending. Second pic is the original post, with the drawing overlaid. Basically, the taxiways should be a little more outwards null

Eh, you guys are talking about one thing, I'm talking about another. That's fine, after all it's just my personal opinion, no need for anyone to get upset about it. Just wanted to share my thoughts.

And how does this go against what I said?

Well, then the mission posted on YT wasn't indicative of that as most of the voice lines were useless banter between the instructor and pilot with pilot acknowledging the instruction and the let's be honest useless interaction with the loadmaster. As I mentioned in my first post, if that "chatter" was replaced with instructor explaining why a procedure is like it is or how it actually works IRL, I wouldn't have said a thing and I would have preferred such solution. I'm not new neither here nor in DCS, just voicing my opinion that I don't like what I saw and why I don't like it. With all that said, I will certainly go through the training missions once to get the visual flow and I learn stuff a lot easier when having some visual reference, but I don't think I'll go over such missions multiple times and for anything I didn't understand I'd rather use manual as then I can get to the information a lot quicker.

Don't do public MP as 99.69% of the servers are: Take off (if you're lucky), dump all missiles in under 3 minutes of takeoff. Landing optional. Not interested in that kind of gameplay. And on the servers that offer this kind of gameplay there is often some custom scoring script running in the background. So yeah, I find having a scoreboard in a simulator weird idea to begin with, but everyone has their own fun...

If the instructor wishes to take time and explain why something works, sure, be my guest. But I'm really not a fan of this excessive talk and banter. Hopefully I'll only have to to through them once to visualize the process and complement the rest with the manual. I don't like hand-holding as most of the times it makes me feel like something that I can't say here I'm sure there are folks that will like that and I know how much effort that has taken, but it's just not for me.

Someone actually uses the scoreboard in the sim?

I like the way you're thinking We'll see in time. Up until recently, Rafale was a big no-no and things changed. Maybe in the future opportunities open up for a Gripen as well. Oh, what I'd give to have it in DCS...

And today I learned something new. Thanks for the explanation

What does magnetic declination have to do with misspelled number on the compass?

Oooooooooooooooooooooh, I completely forgot that's an option I didn't need it so yeah, it slipped my mind completely