Vakarian

Well actually it depends on what you wish to achieve, since the Warthog has 3 position for flaps and here you bound only to move flaps one position up and one position down... So this is far from "properly", especially for people who have 3 position switch for the flaps

I think that post was meant to be sarcastic

Yes, I agree. This is really a bummer and it does look to be frank quite stupid. I'd rather have no such clutter (on some maps, even boats on the rivers pop in like this) then it magically appearing out of thin air 150m in front of me. Now, if we could have that bubble to be ~1km in front of us, it might achieve the desired effect. Or have it variable via some sort of option. Anything but this

Did you make the software for this yourself? If so, it should be fairly trivial to add additional buttons for the certain axis ranges and it would be a perfect fit for your controller. That approach makes a bit more sense since mapping a rotary control with fixed positions is very prone to behaving differently for everyone else. For example, if you have a potentiometer that turns for 270 degrees the physical rotation would be mapped a bit different to a potentiometer that rotates for 300 degrees or longer. With that, you'd end up looking more inside the cockpit in the Viggen to see if what you rotated on your controller matches what's actually selected in the cockpit.

Oh yeah, I was really surprised by it Compared to pretty much everything else, that glass was in pristine condition

Eh, just to keep the bump the thread, here are the pics if anyone is interested how our MiGs were configured (at least number 133). While I wouldn't mind having this cockpit in DCS (just for convenience if nothing else, NATO compatible IFF, radios and some navigation addons), I don't expect it in the slightest. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lr220a1sfLWGXjTeEzyu-tJ_9lhB2Yb0?usp=sharing Just bring it to the current standard and name the price. You'll get the money

Most definitely. Given how old it is, I would gladly pay another $49.99 for a v2. I think no-one sane would expect the upgrade to be free, not after 10 years. MiG-29 really stole almost all my limited time I get for DCS so I would very much like to get updated MiG-21, maybe with some more toys. I will admit I have no idea is there are things to be added for it to still remain a MiG-21bis, but if there are I'd like them in. Sat in the Croatian bis few months ago, it was interesting to see bits of non-soviet equipment in it Wasn't surprised with how cramped it is hahahah.

Well, it's releasing in a year, not tomorrow. So give them time, I would assume getting textures done is hell of a lot easier than getting buildings modeled even remotely correct and then correct-ish types in proper places.

Did you mess with the Carrier's inventory? If the carrier doesn't have weapons in stock, you won't be spawned with them.

Wish @OnReTech all the best for developing this map, very hyped for having a local map in DCS . I would have one request though (and it's a long term one). Given how I was one of the people affected by a very long period of no updates for the Sinai map, please, for the love of all you hold dear/important/holy/whatever, once you release don't wait for another year before pushing new updates. Yes, I'm aware that people with slower internet speeds don't like map patches, however that doesn't mean that there should be year long pause on updates. As there's now roughly once a month patch cycle, please try to squeeze in map updates as frequently as you can. That alone will massively increase the perceived value of the purchase and will help in crowd control. I wasn't too happy with long time of no updates, hopefully I had plenty of other modules and maps to keep me busy but it did leave me with slight doubts will I purchase your next map or not. Please, don't make the same "mistake" twice and keep the updates as frequent as possible.

Aren't those presets for old weather? Same as fog

Plain simply, it takes developer's time and has no factual backing that such configuration ever existed. That's what's "wrong" with this. You are free to make a wish, but don't get upset when that wish isn't granted.

You know of the saying, "When in rome..."? If the aircraft was used in freedom units, then learn them and conform. If the aircraft was used in metric, learn them and conform. Seems like everyone likes realism until it comes to bite them, then realism begone, I want my comfort zone. The 29 is one of the aircraft that we have in DCS that has been configured for both, so kudos to ED for trying to please both groups. When I fly, I fly it in metric with russian cockpit even though I can't read for <profanity> (yet) and I'm not used to the metric units when flying (even though I'm from a country that uses metric) because in all my DCS time I've only flown things that have freedom units so I have a frame of reference for that. Still building one for the metric.

You have double bindings. Check the controls.

In the end, it's all personal preference. We all sit at different distances/heights to the screen, screens are of different resolutions and sizes... That why there are settings to fine tune it to your own liking. What's good for me, likely isn't good for a lot of you. Same goes in the other way. If someone has problems, post what's bothering you and ask for advice.