Jump to content

djacd

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    34

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by djacd

  1. djacd
    For sure, by all means
  2. djacd
    If you need any triggers I can help with lua
  3. djacd
    Hello, as there is no Air to Air training Mission for the AJS37 Viggen, I took it upon myself to create one for general use. Attached is the mission file. Again I offer this mission to Heatblur to include with their AJS37 module as part of their training missions. Video of the Mission is at; I contemplated trying to edit the files to include it in the training missions but even if successful every update overwrites the edits and it's best to stay clear of that directory anyway. So for now just open it like any other mission. For bragging rights - I can hit the IL-76 at 6kms with the Rb-05A 12 - AJS37 Air to Air Training.miz
  4. djacd
    Hello, I've modified the Visual landing training mission for anyone who wishes. CHANGES: Added voice over - instead of reading the instructions. (English only) Modified the text instruction slightly for clarity and brevity add a couple of small graphics fixed the error in that you are NOT landing a Kutaisi as stated in the text but Senaki-Kolkhi Minor stuff I know but the speech really helps To install it either load it as a mission or if you have administrator rights, copy it to your eagle dynamics installation folder, c:\Program Files\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World OpenBeta\Mods\aircraft\AJS37\Missions\Training\ (or what ever path yours is) If Heatblur wants to add it 'officially' I have zero objections. Enjoy, 05 - AJS37 Training visual landing.miz
  5. djacd
    So I re did the track files and saved them into 3 formats. One for 1080p, one for 1440p and one for 2160p (4k) as well another video about them https://youtu.be/OC8WS8eiHHM Ran all three on different computers so should work with these settings. Benchmark Run 1080p.trk Benchmark Run 1440p.trk Benchmark Run 2160p.trk
  6. djacd
    I've create two icons for anyone that wants to use them for those that have both executables mapped. DCS MT Icon 2.ico DCS MT Icon.ico Save the .ico files to a location of your choosing. For those that need to know; right click on the shortcut on your desktop and select Properties Select 'Change Icon' and browse to where you've saved the .ico file Select open and select the icon. That's it DCS MT Icon 2.ico DCS MT Icon.ico
  7. djacd
    Yes, the track file is broken with this patch. (sigh) Two issues with I see; #1 after launching the Kh-58U's at the SA-6 units they fail to loft and/ or track and just fly into the ground. - they are broken as well #2 the AI fly's the Su-25T into the ground right after launching the Kh-58U.. I've re flown the mission with 4 Kh-25MPU and use them for the SEAD on the SA-6's but haven't uploaded the track yet. (need to record the views part) I'm curious to see the how it handles the MASSIVE carpet bombing on Nalchik. In ST mode pre patch the FPS dropped to 14 I believe - HEAVY GPU and CPU load. Will upload it shortly, I will also put my monitor in 1440p and run it as well to compare.
  8. djacd
    The programs, CapFrameX and RTTS do both work in VR - I don't see the overlay in VR but the benchmark data is collected. Also track files do NOT control your view in VR, so you need to fly it yourself.
  9. djacd
    So I created a track file and benchmark 'procedure' to yield results that can be compared against each other. I also created a YouTube video to demonstrate how I use it. https://youtu.be/6y5n0uewpsE The Track file and my bench mark results are all captured in 4K. The settings I used for all the benchmark runs are; This is a list of benchmarks run using the above setting and the track file in case anyone wants to compare results. Going to be curious when Vulkan arrives. Benchmark Run.trk
  10. djacd
    I completely forgot that, thank you!
  11. djacd
    Not sure I would agree, 1 Vs 1 Hornet / Su-27 (AI Ace) the Hornet wins. I will usually 'WASTE' a 120C to break the lock of the ER while cranking + diving. Re-engage and follow up with a second or third 120 as needed. If the Su-27 wins then it's probably because I messed up. Mig-29S different story being Fox-3 capable. The issue I have with the Hornet, is the RADAR, things like swapping sweep azimuth and range is easier in the F-16. Not having an actual MFD button to push I need to mouse click and thus removes hand from Flight stick. As well I find it harder to acquire locks with the 18 vs the 16. The RADAR is the issue for me. I thought I read somewhere the F-16 RADAR is still in development and more changes to come BUT not 100% on this, if so it may become more difficult to lock, (realistic?), as well. Compare the ease of the F-15C to the F/A-18C to lock targets. Completely agree the F-16 acceleration allows for a larger margin of error but usual load out with the F-16 is 4 long and 2 short sticks. The F/A-18 can bring 10 long and 2 short, but normally no more than 6 long for me but still gives me a couple of extras to 'waste'. You' re right the AI is exploitable, and even human vs human 16 or 18 vs Su-27 is still advantage 16/18, (IF the human is careless enough to be in open sky).
  12. djacd
    Sure no problem, here you go. F-16 Tracking Continues Tracking After FCR off.trk
  13. djacd

    Torpedo bomber

    djacd replied to djacd's topic in Wish List

    You're right, the I didn't read my reference article close enough, they only went into production post WWII and in development in 1944. Good information, thank you
  14. djacd
    The F-16 RADAR will still track a locked target after the FCR displays OFF on the MFD and the FCR switch is turned off. 4:27 mark of this video illustrates it.
  15. djacd
    So we were flying in a server our group has set up and we noticed, (myself included), that the F/A-18C's we missing more than the F-16's. So I did an analysis on it. Made a video of my analysis and I wasn't surprised by the results. ED has done a good job on this. For reference;
  16. djacd

    Torpedo bomber

    djacd posted a topic in Wish List

    The P-47D can carry more, the Spitfire, P-51D and P-47D all are faster. There is no reconnaissance version, so where is the niche for this Warbird? Torpedo bomber, the Ju-88 carries them, so we need one - albeit all we can hunt is subs
  17. djacd
    Thank you, for the reply, I think the damage is not bad - the only questionable thing I have is that the fuze delay, for the most part, makes things worse or is that what your referring to about the Ammo depot? All in all was more of a fact finding video for me. Seeing what works and what doesn't, no intention to single out any flaws.
  18. djacd
    I did a comparison between the different 2000lb bombs in DCS to test their effectiveness on a hardened shelter. Attached, (by request) is the mission file with a simple lua script that measures the health of the statics and the effectiveness of the various bombs in DCS. Tested munitions were the various JDAMS GBU-31(V)1, 2, 3, 4 /B on three airframes, A-10C II, F-16CM, and the F/A-18C other tests were Mk-84, GBU-10 and GBU-24. full test is here; Bombing Analysis.miz
  19. djacd

    Control Bindings

    djacd posted a topic in Wish List

    It would be nice if controls were bound with the On/Else off logic. Any switch/ control that offers an On/Off could offer On/Else off as well. This way a single input would control the switch properly and better immersion. For example, Currently: if the Electrical power ON/OFF is bound to an input. Flip the switch on and power comes but to turn it back off you need to cycle the switch off and back on to turn the power off. On/Else off logic: Turn the switch on but when you turn the switch off the INPUT is removed and the switch turns off. Your polling the input any way and very simple code.
  20. djacd
    Thank you, I forgot to mention, don't have DCS running while doing this.
  21. djacd
    What do you mean 'Elevated Mode'? Every time DCS is patched I need to fix Voice Attack by * delete or move the export.lua from the saved games\scripts directory * launching Vaicomm - having it create a new export.lua * edit the new export.lua (actually just replace it with the old one) and it works... don't know why as the 'new' and the original are identical but it 'unbreaks' Voice Attack. - VERY strange If I didn't need to do this dance it would be great.
  22. djacd
    Debug mode showed nothing - exact same response as before. HOWEVER, your instructions to EXPORT than IMPORT the new profile fixed the issue. Working as advertised. Thanks to you both, Hornblower and Hollywood. I must have corrupted the original profile somehow, although, I did no editing to it other than setting up the Push-To-Talk section. The file sizes of the profiles were/are; Broken: 131,696 Working: 150,885 So ADDING the HOTAS functions to the PTT should have I assume grow the file size but it shrunk. So I must have Fat Fingered it. I've included the working Debug window for reference if others have this or a similar issue. Everything above the "Recognized: 'request startup' (Confidence 98)" was missing in debug mode in the broken profile. Now to add chatter and see if I can break that! :smilewink:
  23. djacd
    ok will do that here is a second - but came here to update I've been trying various configurations/ re-installs/ earlier versions and got an "Error" message cut and pasted 1:00:23.643 Command 'request startup' is currently disabled for this session and was not executed. will try the debug mode
  24. djacd
    I'm confused, why would you assume that - it's recognizing the phrases but not executing them. When I use just voice attack it recognizes the phrase and completes the command as configured. The confidence level on the is 95. Am I reading that wrong? is lower better? Oh, I have run through twice already ftr. To simplify the commands I have removed the necessity for ATC/player names just issue the commands such as request startup. When you say things like "Chief" before the update is would state waiting for further or something like that - now just say recognized chief So voice training I think is the wrong path.
  25. djacd
    Thanks for the replies; I've continued to plug away and still doesn't work. I've tried deleting the Vaicom directory and re-installing I've re-installed DCS At this point I just want my money back - JUST bought it and I get 1 day's use. For those that it works for I get the attraction for this software but it's a major source of frustration for me. Could be I'm missing something simple so I've taken screen shots of the behavior. It recognizes the command but fails to execute. The only modules active are the ones sold/distributed by ED. (Except the Garmin) I've tried different missions and several aircraft.
×
×
  • Create New...