Hulkbust44

To be clear, the only incorrect statement is regarding the SCS direction as listed above. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Post a video of it happening in a recent build, a lot of behavior has changed since then. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Nope, EOM is actually different. It is a TOO 'RANGE KNOWN' function. LAR is 0 to +/- 135 Not available in PB. (Correction it seemed it was in 2002, but with a note that it ended with 163XXX, so it was a function on some that was removed later, TOO EOM stayed.) This relies on us having TOO range functions first... Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

I certainly have it, passive ranging for the -73 and ATLFLIR is known due to data block for each. I'll see about making a report/request here. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Yes this is a bug in that we can’t change the chart type individually from the scale. You can decenter the map to get a larger scale for a lower level chart. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Combination of trigonometry, the DTED, and the radar if in the radar FOV. In DCS you can see that the radar is contibuting by RADAR or AGR on the HUD. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That’s why you use the AZ/EL, you can see how everything is stacked. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The real Hornet heavily utilizes the AZ/EL and additional MSI properties. You're supposed to be able to just step through the MSI tracks regardless of whether your radar sees them at that moment or not. Additionally, the TDC on the SA should be "magnetized" and snap to any track or point making this whole thing a lot easier. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

That’s the same as using the TDC, it’s the same cursor. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

How were you testing this? Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Got it, thanks! That’s a step in the right direction. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

What does that IFF rejection line mean for the Hornet? As I understand there is no mode/code simulation so rejection wouldn’t be possible anyway. Also the EXP slew line needs some more context it seems. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

There are a few odd lines in the changes today, but what on Earth does “Wrong IFF code rejection behavior” mean? As I understand no CIT/IFF modes/codes are modeled for any Eagle Dynamics aircraft, did that just change? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No, in the Hornet you use the AZ/EL as a visual representation of the altitude stack and radar elevation. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Looks like part of the ghost velocity vector as the VV is caged to the center of the HUD. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

What was the altitude difference? Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Realistically that would shear the PTS as you are keeping the clutch engaged Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Some thing you can do is decenter the map on either HSI or SA and that will double the scale looking infront of you. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Do you have a video to share? There are multiple flight conditions where the speed brake will retract automatically unless you are continuously holding the switch out. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Are you testing this after the APU is powered up? Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

They may, there's a possibility there is a real military contract for this like the A-10, and we'll get the redacted version. If they have a manual or two, then there's no reason this would be any less fidelity than the Hornet in it's current state.

Of course, but you don't need to turn off the radar with an AESA, the vast majority of RWRs won't see it.

Yeah I just flew around for a bit and certainly had no problem keeping perfect on-speed AoA (solid donut) until banking past 30 degrees. Sure if you want it perfect give it a single tap nose up, then back down once you roll outside, but it should certainly be well within the E-backet at all times. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk Could you post a video with the control indicator enabled? Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

It said he was fast, which is how you refer to AoA below on-speed. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

It's the groove that matters yes, but you should have no problem maintaining on-speed in the turn. I just grabbed a random video, but here's a guy demonstrating the turn on-speed. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk