Tonker

Genuinely surprised that the next Heatblur module is, by popular belief, going to be the A-6. Obviously the voting is irrational, willfully selctive in acccepting evidence, and only tangentially related to the question actually asked - but even so I wasn't expecting so much demand for yet another US and/or strike aircraft. Isn't there enough capabality for this already? Yes it's fun and it's cool, but it's already catered for. There are huge areas that are not, and I'd love to see these investigated in DCS and Heatblur have the chops to make the unusual interesting rather than irritating. Given that DCS should just come clean about really being a c.1980-1990 Cold War simulator and drop all other pretences, there are some glaring ommisions. I know that the narrative is America vs. Russia, but is it really acceptable for DCS to continue to cater only to these two nations? Thank you Heatblur for the Viggen, congrats on the F-14 (by all account a remarkable achievement), and please please let your next module be more closely related to your first rather than second release... What do I think will be next? The Tornado fulfils a much longer and more compelling list of criteria than the A-6, and I'd be happy to see it next. I'm sure the A-6 won't be far behind, because it is great, would be a good addition to DCS, has (evidently) a lot of support etc etc etc. What would I like to see next? Anything that wasn't used in Vietnam but would've been used in the Fulda Gap. There is so much to choose from, and it's all quirky and interesting and fun - like the Viggen and the F14 - and Heatblur are the only developers who might pull it off :) Anyway...

Isn't this just the most Heatblur thing you've seen? :) There's heaps of good stuff, but check out the input of waypoints via electronic cursor, c. 6'30', programming the flight information cassette, and feeding it into the aircraft at c.11'54'' Yes please... :)