TotenDead

Welp, i also catch this bug from time to time, no idea how to fix it. BUT! I'd recommend you to go to spectator after landing and pick the plane again, it's faster, then to wait for refueling.

Yea, i suppose there must be a russian version of a viper or hornet cockpit either

Как там, ww2 все ещё неиграбельное без включённых точек в онлайне?

На столько, что применяет Х-66)

Продублируйте здесь, прям на русском можно.

Как так вышло, что у непродутой аим-120 лтх были далеки от оригинала, а у непродутой Р-27 они близки?

Ну да, это типа временное решение до продувки, ты, НЯП, это так называл Включая Ми-24, Апач и МиГ-29?

И что? Тут не имбу просят, а самолет, +- равный по возможностям и не сильно отделенный от нашего варианта хорнета/Ф-16 по годам

Тыкать тумблеры в игрульке - для тех, кто хочет идти в летное

Количество пусков какое-то жалкое. Если бы было выпущено 1000 Аим-120 и 1000 Р-27, то можно было бы о чем-то говорить

Есть трек?

Так выше ж видео

Почему вторая ракета то в землю ушла?

Тебя в очередной раз мокнуть в твою некомпетентность? Где там ОЛС стоит у J-11A? А где она стоит у Су-27СМ? F/A-18C lot 20 было сделано даже меньше, чем МиГ-29С - всего 10 штук, что, выводим из игры?)) Да, Су-57 у нас не воюет против Ф-22) А вообще, для интересного геймплея нужны не самые новые самолеты конкретного периода, наиболее удобного для одной из сторон, а просто примерно равные по возможностям. Что за ракеты будущего, на вооружении РФ Р-77 никогда не стояла, ее существование в ДКС - это выдумка ЕД, к ним претензии. Можешь накатать петицию с просьбой о выводе этой УРВВ из игры) Какая у нас конкретно АИМ-120С, родной?) У нас сами ЕД не могут сказать что это за ракета у них вышла, а ты знаешь?

Летал?

Дай людям спокойно аим-260 сделать, не мешай этими своими Р-27

Как там с исправлением бага? Может просто скопируете метод наведения с с-125?

For example, another airshow

У них схожая компоновка - жирный, не слишком обтекаемый фюзеляж с небольшим крылом Compared to other 5 gen fighters - yes, sluggish brick How do you know that? IT'S not what 's usually done by regular pilots, but that was on MAKS and was performed Just to show off a little

That was done on purpose, it's a way to decelerate faster F-35 as a good 5th gen fighter was killed by the need to make a STOVL version of the plane. It could wery well be of a raptor of J-31 shape without any loss in terms of A2A and a2g capabilities, but since the decision to make a STOVL variant was made it had no other option then to become a somewhat sluggish brick.

They would. Except the ones which have problems with construction, for example. Surely you understand that a huge military like russian is supposed to perform not only defensive, but also offensive operations because of the geopolitical interests of the country? Furthermore, your understanding of Defensive is quite wrong as even if you are defending you still need to destroy targets not only close to the front line, but further into the enemy territory. Moreover, there are naval targets like ship and carrier strike groups that still need to be taken out. For that you need huge missile. What's more, local conflicts might occur where usually only a few dozens of planes needed and more sophisticated weapons would make an edge over the enemy larger and losses lower. Finally, Russia has to keep up with nato on the same tech level as things might always go the way noone wants them to go. There are no doubts that combined Nato forces are way more numerous than russian army, but is's a well known fact that the unity between Nato isn't perfect and if some of the major nato players decide not to participate in a conflict, a coalition of military weak countries like germany+britain and other minor players must be overwhelmed both with quantity and quality. And in the air it's easirer to fight with quality, not quantity About multitool - its cheaper to have 1 multirole plane than 2 specialized ones

Yes, so?

Just like Su-57 Sure, still, shame tax payers threw millions on unfinished garbage. But that's the price you pay when you start production before trials are fully completed. Yes, Su-57 was used in combat in Syria, successfully and fully ended its trials and is now serially produced fully combat capable right from the plane that made its maiden flight a month or so ago. Guess what, each aircraft type has prototypes that are used only for ground tests and never get into the air thought they are fully capable of that. You probably have n o idea why, do you? Maybe? Subject to further cuts? Funny, name at least one contract on fighters in Russia that wasn't fully completed in the last 10 years. There're none, so keep your foam in your mouth

Not so much, listen to F-35 pilots please. F-35 was rushed into service without successfully completing its trials first. Unlike Su-57 or F-22. It definitely will, the question is how many dozens or hundreds of planes are going to be semi-capable for the rest of their times because of the rush. Too big question to ask me. That's what multi-role planes are designed for. Furthermore, what can attack can as well be used as a defensive weapon Su-27s, MiG-29s in the first place. Su-30SMs later. Some MiG-31 might be replaced as well IMO

Read the first sentence please. What US added to IOC so that its corrupted F-35 program looked better in tax payers eyes is US business. Numbers are not equal capabilities and performance of the airframe