TotenDead

Или 9.13, а может просто модуль из гс3 показали)

I was just referring to the fact that people are less eager to buy inferior versions of planes. And even though your statement that 109Gs would open a vast amount of opportunities in terms of recreating historical events or just making non-44/45 year missions is correct, the fact is - most would want to fly a superior version, kurfurst, and firstly buy it and only after that question themselves whether they really need an interesting but a bit less capable aircraft and does this additional less capable plane really cost the money. Don't get me wrong, most of DCS players would love to have an extra 109. But not for another 30 bucks "Especially once one considers that the G-10 is essentially a K4 with an external tailwheel and no wheeldoor covers." And a different, larger wing "The G14/AS is a G10 with a slightly weaker engine. The G14 is slightly faster at low altitudes but slower on higher altitudes than the /AS variant. The G6 and/or the G6/AS variants are what the average German pilot flew during D-Day." Well, these are 5 planes, not just 1 "G";)

Конечно кто-то купил 190А8, но на серверах их практически нет. Это говорит о многом

У ЕДшной фоки д9 нет радиокомпаса, глиссаду по радиомаякам не выдержать (т.е посадку на хреново освещенную полосу совершить толково не выйдет), направление на радиомаяк не взять. И ничего, играется

Разумно было начинать с битвы за британию и постепенно вводить новые мессершмитты. Но нам дали сразу самый лучший, так что о хороших продажах более ранних версий можно забыть. А коли можно забыть о продажах, то и самолет делать никто не станет - не выгодно

Белый - вырвиглазный, а вот темный вариант весьма приятен

У Ф-16 есть какие-то ограничения по скорости при двух подкрыльевых баках? А то при мне 1700 кмч выжал на 5000м

I have Fw-190D9 here and it's almost no different from War thunder one except that dcs one has a different sight. Just sayin that FF doesn't make a plane any better if you aren't interested in pressing extra buttons to start the aircraft

All radars in dcs are simplified. Just like ecm.

Any wing when made larger has more drag then the smaller one if their aerodynamic profiles are equal or similar. What you're saying applies to super hornet as well. However, i suppose you didnt mention that 29K forward wing edge is sharp compared to vanila 29. The shape of the wing is different as well. So i guess you are just using too much imagination as there are no grafics awailable and structure and aerodynamics of these aircraft is absolutely different as Mig-29K has almost nothing similar compared to 29A except of the way it looks. And no, MiG-35s' wing is no different from 29k one. Tf dude, it' the same folding wing which is fixed in "unfold"

Lol. Every single aircraft with classic aerodynamical arrangement has losses to stabilisation on ots elevator. With or without FBW. " MiG-29K has better aerodynamics, larger wing area, better mechanisation and more powerful engines to compensate any added to the basic design weight.

Many people play dcs to fight, not to press buttons

Да, я не из тех, кто привык платить в ресторане за салфетки

А за обновление кавказа платил? А за уточнение и правку ошибок в ФМ на самолетах, на которых летаешь? А за продувку аим-120 платил? Предложение платить мне ради успокоения твоей души все еще в силе

Давай за каждую обнову платить. И за улучшение графоуни. Ты, кстати, платил за обновление модели миг-31? Нет? Могу свою карточку скинуть для успокоения твоей совести

Так литаки то не современные, простые в плане начинки и весь самолетный штат работает только на них

Хочешь модельку уровня +- 2020 - плоти нолог

Это РМД-2 которая? На 1:10 - не великоваты УА и вообще такие эволюции для 120-й? У нее все же нет ОВТ

Уже давно и они все еще гов... Такое. У грим риперов есть, с месяц назад тестили

Please write what is classified in Su-27? All of its manuals were published on this forum long time ago

Close to symmetric? 4th army in the world? He-he. Us-led coalition vs an army with little to none modern equipment is nowhere near "symmetric". However, i wouldn't argue with the rest of your comment

They just like to eat and western stuff sells better. No conspiracy.

ED claims are of no interest to me tbh as Sukhoi is opened to discussion. Problems with documentation might occur with older planes as some of the materials might be lost, but Su-24? No problem at all. The proof to these words was published on this forum multiple times

Calm down, toxic rebel

Yah-yah-yah, well known "fact". You can see how Mi-24 is banned by russian MoD