Flying Bull

Hello, I ordered the MFSSB base and F-16 stick combo. The base arrived before the stick and I installed into the pit to be fully "ready". When I connect the base (with no stick attached) the SimApp software recognizes the base, but I have no MFSSB settings to configure. Is this normal? Will attaching the stick when it arrives enable the MFSSB configuration options? Kind of feels like I have a non-MFSSB base right now. There is a very small physical displacement which I can move, and have calibrated the base by manipulating the mount. Hoping lack of MFSSB Configuation options at this point is normal Update: In SimApp my base is is listed under hardware, but no MFSSB listed . I opened the device and there are MFSSB components. Thanks in advance

i agree with OP. I'm having a harder time focusing on IHADDS symbology recently. VR - RH eye projection. No change to my eyesighjt.

@IronMike Thank you SO much - this would be a fantastic default implementation. Great concept by OP! 1 x suggestion: for those without VA - if we could have an option to activate the verbal checklist and have RIO call out challenge items with a suitable pause between each item and automatically read the next item. This would be fantastic. On an similar topic -I think RIO callout for "Wings are moving" in the break (perhaps triggered with wings 68 and hook down condition?) and optional VSI callouts/speed off the 180 would be great too.

Warning caution panel annunciators and master warning light need to be more visible please. At a minimum.. When you do F-14A, please consider factory fresh! Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Hey JAR, please don’t stop making videos! In-cockpit, instructional would be awesome too. Enjoy flying a “real” F/A-18 in sim - hope it meets your expectations Cheers Go_Sky Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

We need an OV-10 bronco and your the guys to do it! @Razbam - i also have the OV-10D Tactical Manual NWP 55-6-OV10A/D Rev E 1992 if you need it.

I’d love an MD-/500530. No front doors. Mini guns. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Woog - so far reality. I have actually flown Boeing’s AH-6i. Avionics wise - there is nothing off the shelf in it. It is similar to AH-64E. Show me a civilian MD-500 with a 6 bladed rotor system. The current AH/MH-6 variants bear little resemblance to civilian MDs in any other area beside external appearance. On the other hand MD do make an armed MD-530G - as used by AFG military. Not much different to a civilian MD-530. just weaponised. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’m 45 years young. Been simming since the 80s - sublogic “Jet” on an IBM XT. from there it was Falcon (1st LAN in 1988 over serial cable connection) through Falcon AT, 3.0 and Falcon 4.0 I’ve tried all the combat sims through the ages, every Janes’, SSI Flanker through LOMAC to DCS. “Interceptor” for Amiga blew my mind when I saw the demo at a local department store - Glowing Amraam’s teaser made me feel the same way. Day job is flying heavy metal for airlines - so I avoid civilian fixed wing sims. I’m a big helicopter fan though. LOVE helo sims (and RL helo flying) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hey Joey45, From Where did you get the information - that AH-64D is off the scope? From a technical knowledge/document perspective there are no hurdles. I have no luck deal about licensing issues etc. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The early MBU -12s were also green before they became grey. From what I can tell the main difference is that MBU-14s (USN) have a larger Comms block than their USAF counterparts. The images above do NOT show MBU-14. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Thanks for the replies gents. Much appreciated. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agree Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'd love to have the option of using an external device such as iPad running ForeFlight app or similar, showing DCS moving map. I understand the limitations of DCSW essentially using a flat representation of the earth, however with relatively small areas ie, NTTR, Caucuses, SOH - surely this limitation could be overcome with some mathematical adjustments to output data. Would really like someone from ED (Wags?) to comment on feasibility of this feature. This link from ForeFlight describes what is required: https://www.foreflight.com/support/network-gps/ Much appreciated! Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD