MarbleFalcon

"i guess other, more experienced livery creators that are protesting this" this part wasnt implying something like "me and people who are protesting is better than everyone". Im sorry if you understand in that way. I just didnt want to equate myself with other people. After all, for example Santus, JG1_Vonrd and probably you are (no offense, just havent noticed your username on user files etc. before) much better at this than me. I still consider myself a newbie and still have a lot to learn. Also, even tho your submission to contest is bad move during this situation from my perspective, gotta say i really like your work. Thank you for your good wishes and again, sorry for missunderstanding :d

Yep, I am the same guy. As i said before in my previous post, ive already made one, specifically Turkish Air Force 133rd Squadron livery. And seeing psd file requirement in newsletter was shocking for me cuz i was and still am ready to publish livery. But being able to encrypting file in submission is a good news. Im still optimistic about joining to competition but me and i guess other, more experienced livery creators that are protesting this really need to see a helping hand from ED about this situation. Otherwise as i said im still working on the liveries and i would love to share it as soon as possible :d Btw thanks for your support NineLine, i really appreciate it.

Welllll....... Ive already posted one in competition thread but seems like it got deleted. Again, even tho ive already made one livery and im going to make more just because im obsessed with F-5; im also not going to participate competition for now as a form of protest. I dont have any problem with encryption of 3d models. I understand that ED wants to protect their intellectual property and Im cool with that. Problem of me and i guess every people that are protesting this is simply not having access 3d model on Modelviewer & not having access to default liveries and then having expectations to create miracles without those. We couldve have a new access protocol on Modelviewer with this new encryption system. There are endless amount of solution to solve this problems. But from what i see; ED just doesnt want to solve our problems. We're making liveries just because our compassion to the game and livery making, and we're doing this for free (well competition also offering little prizes but, thats cherry on top) So locking default textures and access to MV and giving us just simple paint kits and a basic lua file is nothing but being disrespectful to this community.

Well, about the swiss (0.2 type bort numbers) vstab bort numbers, i cant find the code line for the fixed decals that stays near bort number. Also did you guys noticed that even the bort numbers default liveries looks weird in different aspect?

I created one if anyone interested. Cuz obviously this topic is marked as "solved" so all we say in here is kinda pointless

I created this topic cuz other one is marked as "solved" which isnt really solved obviously cuz we still dont have access to default texture files etc.null

I dont get that why did they even released the paintkit lmao. Do they really expect us to magically scooby doo the camouflages or airshow team liveries without any instruction or support? I kinda understand encrypting 3d shapes, but textures and default liveries? Im actually curious how they thought we would make liveries with this limited sources. Even making a simple TuAF hill grey livery is taking days because of this lol. If anyone that is crazy as me working a livery for new f5, please dont share on userfiles. I agree what Mach3DS said, they are not giving a damn because they see people making livery anyway.

Over the past years, a considerable number of Turkish users has been interested in DCS. Now, again, this overall number is still not insignificant. There are a lot of Turks who dont speak English or any other language but interested in aerial warfare, helicopters, basically the content that DCS offers. Now you can say that the cockpits of aircraft are also contain other languages, mostly English. Well yes, and im not saying "lets make Turkish cockpits" cuz that would be ridicilous considering even the Turkish Air Force doesnt use Turkish cockpits. But you should know that there is a big difference between trying to read something in an encyclopedia tab and trying to understand and memorize what is written in the cockpit. The encyclopedia was just an example. Turkish localization is a needed for this game. There are many Turkish users, including myself, who can help and translate/localize without expecting any financial income.

We at least need at least one Turkish base for scenerios like Operation Desert Storm, Operation Provide Confort or War on terror (isis and pkk). Malatya Erhac AFB, Batman AFB, Diyarbakir AFB or Van Airport for heli missions are the best ones for this map. Well, actually Incirlik would be the best option, but you know how far Incirlik is :d

Yeah, but I dont agree on takeoff part. I can easily take off from 3rd runway (or whatever you may call it) with almost full load. Only differences between my hornet and normal su-33 player who is getting ready for taking of from Kuz is 1st, my hornet is way more lighter than brick Flanker 2nd, I can carry smart bombs and 3rd, he can use jet blast deflectors and deck chocks but I cant :(

We have SuperCarrier module for like 4 years but sadly we still dont have cross platform capability between Nimitz and Kuznetsov class carriers. I mean, of course an Su-33 never landed to any western made carrier and same for Tomcat/Hornet. But its also same for Mi-24. Afaik no Mi-24 landed any western carrier/amphibious ship; but we can operate Hind from any ship safely in DCS. Same should be for naval fighters. I watched Spud's Kuznetsov video and applied same codding stuff to my own. I never experienced this much of fun before. STOBAR Ops with Hornet is a thing that every Hornet user should experience. But the thing is, why would we constantly forced to edit some lua files just because Kuznetsov with Hornet doesnt pass integrity check. Why shouldnt it be official thing to use. Why cant we also use jet blast deflectors and brake thingy with Hornet which is works with Su-33 when you press "U". "It wouldnt be realistic" cool, dont use it then. No one also forces you to take off from Tarawa with Hind :d. I guess so much people would think same with me. It wouldnt effect badly our gameplay experience. Instead, it would give us Stobar ops capability for more naval aircraft modules. Please ED, send some Hornet to Kuznetsov's deck

IDF Mods team already working on it. Its a mod but a mod that based on F/A-18C module. Its the same guys that made F-16I mod.

Hey Badger633, I'd like help you on this Turkish dubbing thingy. My discord username is "marblefalcon"

This is my entry for French Air Force liveries. Armée de l'Air Blue: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3329757/ Armée de l'Air Mosquito Guerre d' Algérie Camo: WAITING FOR USER FILES ACTIVATION W Armée de l'Air Mosquito Guerre d' Algérie Sharkmouth Camo: Will be done in several hours

Im changing & re-editing my TurAF livery entry. This yellow trainer/torpedo bomber Mk.IIIs stationed at 3rd AB, not 1st. Because of that, I updated the link and changed some things on the livery. I also made 1 additional TurAF livery which is exactly stationed at 1st AB. Im sharing that livery too at this post. THIS IS MY ENTRY FOR TURAF LIVERIES TurAF 1st Air Regiment Eskisehir AB Bomber Wing: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3329688/ TurAF 3st Air Regiment Gaziemir AB Trainer / Torpedo Bomber Wing: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3329261/

This is my entry for the competition (subject to change) TurAF 1st Air Regiment Gaziemir AB Trainer-Torpedo Bomber Wing https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3329261/

Looks like a first class fantastic texture job. Very nice. Im looking forward for this. The question is, is this texture addon breaks IC; or is it works like a livery?

Yea, I dont have hope about F-16I (because of classified stuff) but imagine we have different fully functional flyable F-16C and D's; like BMS. For example Israeli F-16C Barak with Spice, Popeye and Python 5 or Greek F-16C/D with IRIS-T or Turkish F-16C/Ds with SOM, HGK, KGK etc. Even just a normal D variant would be wonderful addition enough for DCS F-16.

I think this mod should be an official upgrade module for DCS F-16; like A-10C II Tankkiller upgrade. It could be awesome to have a full fidelity F-16D with F-16C at DCS World core game. I hope any ED oficials would consider this.

Why wouldnt anyone want such a beast like this, just curious...

I would sell my soul for full fidelity T-129 ATAK module

Adding Harpoon and adding 4 HARM aren't same subject for F-16. There is no Harpoon for F-16 but now we already have HARM.

Tbh, HARMs on 4th and 6th stations won't change realism. If you dont want to load 4 HARM, then dont load 4 HARM xD. No one pushing you for it. So,my answer is "Yes, stations 4 and 6 should have HARM and Mav"